Skip to content
by APPdiesel » Tue Jul 25, 2017 5:11 pm
by McLeansvilleAppFan » Tue Jul 25, 2017 6:19 pm
by ASU3432Mi » Wed Jul 26, 2017 1:58 pm
by McLeansvilleAppFan » Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:33 pm
ASU3432Mi wrote:I basically read the whole article. This could/should be devastating to UNC and seems like their arrogance and delay tactics throughout this marathon investigation have antagonized the NCAA. Not Smart. I don't know the difference between level 1 and 3 violations, but severe penalties; particularly to Men's Basketball, Football and Women's Basketball should be levied.
by APPdiesel » Wed Jul 26, 2017 10:57 pm
by Appdoggy » Wed Jul 26, 2017 11:34 pm
by appfanjj » Thu Jul 27, 2017 9:27 am
by NattyBumppo'sRevenge » Thu Jul 27, 2017 9:40 am
by ericsaid » Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:08 pm
McLeansvilleAppFan wrote:I don't have time to read all of this, but just skimming the language is a lot harsher than I thought the NCAA would use against UNC-CHeat. Though I am still not sure if that means the NCAA will actually do anything to the school.
I feel like this is as much about how the other Prig5 schools want to punish UNC-CHeat for getting an advantage, but they do not want push too hard against UNC-CHeat in case they are caught with their pants down and at that point they would like lax enforcement themselves.
I hope my cynical view of this is incorrect and the NCAA handles this in a fair, honest, and equitable way. Based on what I know that should include some pretty stiff penalties, much more than has been doled out than recent memory has been done.
by CVAPP » Thu Jul 27, 2017 5:13 pm
ericsaid wrote:A theory I heard is that the reason for the delays in investigations and punishment into UNC is because the former AD who all of this began under is currently the Commissioner of the ACC.
by AtlAppMan » Thu Jul 27, 2017 11:42 pm
by McLeansvilleAppFan » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:31 pm
by McLeansvilleAppFan » Thu Oct 05, 2017 1:07 pm
by ASU3432Mi » Thu Oct 05, 2017 1:26 pm
by NattyBumppo'sRevenge » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:30 pm
by hotrod2001 » Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:17 pm
Appdoggy wrote: ↑Wed Jul 26, 2017 11:34 pm
So how many years later? The NCAA is such a joke.
by McLeansvilleAppFan » Thu Oct 12, 2017 4:29 pm
by moonshine » Fri Oct 13, 2017 9:12 am
by NewApp » Fri Oct 13, 2017 9:19 am
APPdiesel wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2017 5:11 pm
Recall UNC thumbed their noses at the NCAA in regards to the 20+ years of fraudulent academic courses designed to keep athletes eligible saying it was basically "none of their business".
Today the NCAA fired back in a big way:
"When a member institution allows an academic department to provide benefits to student-athletes that are materially different from the general student body, it is the NCAA's business.
When athletics academic counselors exploit 'special arrangement' classes for student-athletes in ways unintended by and contrary to the bylaws, it is the NCAA's business.
When a member institution provides student-athletes an inside track to enroll in unpublicized courses where grades of As and Bs are the norm, it is the NCAA's business.
When a member institution uses 'special arrangement' courses to keep a significant number of student-athletes eligible, it is the NCAA's business.
When a member institution fails or refuses to take action after receiving actual notice of problems involving student-athletes, thereby allowing violations to compound and to continue for years, it is the NCAA's business."
http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... p3/a364332
by YesAppCan » Fri Oct 13, 2017 9:23 am
Return to “Other Schools' Athletics”
I forgot my password