UL-M beating Wake

User avatar
firemoose
Posts: 8282
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Has thanked: 932 times
Been thanked: 3950 times

UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by firemoose » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:40 pm

in Winston-Salem 21-13 with 3:23 left in the game. Wake just got the ball back on their 7. UL-M has held Wake to two 1st downs in the second half so far. We'll see if they can hold on.

User avatar
firemoose
Posts: 8282
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Has thanked: 932 times
Been thanked: 3950 times

Re: UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by firemoose » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:58 pm

Final: UL-M 21 Wake 19

User avatar
asu66
Posts: 26935
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 1:21 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 2044 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by asu66 » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:58 pm

UL-M 21, WFU 19 Final
Proud triple-degree App grad--Classes of '66, '70 and '81.
If it happens to the Apps, it happens to me!

User avatar
TheMoody1
Posts: 6996
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 8:45 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Links 'O Tryon
Has thanked: 637 times
Been thanked: 719 times

Re: UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by TheMoody1 » Sat Sep 14, 2013 3:25 pm

If Wake would grow a pair, starting next year they could lose to a Sun Belt school with a full stadium instead of a half empty one. :lol:

9Steelman
Posts: 524
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 4:40 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 270 times

Re: UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by 9Steelman » Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:11 pm

Wake might as well played App State. Lost anyway, but just think of time and travel costs that could be save, plus 8-10,000 more tickets sold. Bigger crowds mean more dollars for restaurants, motels, gas stations and concession sales. I truly don't understand a home and home for WF with ULM versus a home and home with the Apps.

User avatar
vegattk
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:08 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by vegattk » Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:53 pm

9Steelman wrote:Wake might as well played App State. Lost anyway, but just think of time and travel costs that could be save, plus 8-10,000 more tickets sold. Bigger crowds mean more dollars for restaurants, motels, gas stations and concession sales. I truly don't understand a home and home for WF with ULM versus a home and home with the Apps.
Where does Wake recruit?

The only reason I ask is because if they recruit heavily in NC losing to ULM would be far less painful than losing to ASU. Since we probably will be recruiting in the same area they don't want to appear "worse than" App State...

That's the only reason I can think of...
One game does not a postseason make.
More App Games > Less App Games

App74
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 5:05 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 431 times
Been thanked: 189 times

Re: UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by App74 » Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:51 am

vegattk wrote:
9Steelman wrote:Wake might as well played App State. Lost anyway, but just think of time and travel costs that could be save, plus 8-10,000 more tickets sold. Bigger crowds mean more dollars for restaurants, motels, gas stations and concession sales. I truly don't understand a home and home for WF with ULM versus a home and home with the Apps.
Where does Wake recruit?

The only reason I ask is because if they recruit heavily in NC losing to ULM would be far less painful than losing to ASU. Since we probably will be recruiting in the same area they don't want to appear "worse than" App State...

That's the only reason I can think of...
Plain and simple - recruiting is the reason Wake will not schedule App. Secondly, they don't need the money. The Winston-Salem economy would love it. However, Wake Forest is an economy in and of itself. The only way an App-Wake game happens is when the big boosters get tired of looking at thousands of empty seats and force Wellman to make a change in scheduling.

User avatar
ASUMountaineer
Posts: 7250
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:20 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: State of Appalachian
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by ASUMountaineer » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:51 am

9Steelman wrote:Wake might as well played App State. Lost anyway, but just think of time and travel costs that could be save, plus 8-10,000 more tickets sold. Bigger crowds mean more dollars for restaurants, motels, gas stations and concession sales. I truly don't understand a home and home for WF with ULM versus a home and home with the Apps.
I'm sure they heavily recruit LA. :lol:
Poster formerly known as AppState03 (MMB) and currently known as ASUMountaineer everywhere else.

User avatar
ASUMountaineer
Posts: 7250
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:20 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: State of Appalachian
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by ASUMountaineer » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:51 am

App74 wrote:
vegattk wrote:
9Steelman wrote:Wake might as well played App State. Lost anyway, but just think of time and travel costs that could be save, plus 8-10,000 more tickets sold. Bigger crowds mean more dollars for restaurants, motels, gas stations and concession sales. I truly don't understand a home and home for WF with ULM versus a home and home with the Apps.
Where does Wake recruit?

The only reason I ask is because if they recruit heavily in NC losing to ULM would be far less painful than losing to ASU. Since we probably will be recruiting in the same area they don't want to appear "worse than" App State...

That's the only reason I can think of...
Plain and simple - recruiting is the reason Wake will not schedule App. Secondly, they don't need the money. The Winston-Salem economy would love it. However, Wake Forest is an economy in and of itself. The only way an App-Wake game happens is when the big boosters get tired of looking at thousands of empty seats and force Wellman to make a change in scheduling.
Or force a change from Wellman. People can bash Charlie Cobb, but thank goodness Wellman is not our AD.
Poster formerly known as AppState03 (MMB) and currently known as ASUMountaineer everywhere else.

User avatar
BeauFoster
Posts: 6871
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:42 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: In a cubicle
Has thanked: 1746 times
Been thanked: 2165 times

Re: UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by BeauFoster » Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:35 am

Trust me on this - there are big money donors at WFU who don't care if they ever play App again. I'd even go so far as to say they don't want WFU to play App. What the Moricle Society says, Wellman does.
Give 'em hell!

huskie3
Posts: 4601
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2000 9:57 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Gaston County
Has thanked: 690 times
Been thanked: 657 times

Re: UL-M beating Wake

Unread post by huskie3 » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:04 pm

App74 wrote:
vegattk wrote:
9Steelman wrote:Wake might as well played App State. Lost anyway, but just think of time and travel costs that could be save, plus 8-10,000 more tickets sold. Bigger crowds mean more dollars for restaurants, motels, gas stations and concession sales. I truly don't understand a home and home for WF with ULM versus a home and home with the Apps.
Where does Wake recruit?
The only reason I ask is because if they recruit heavily in NC losing to ULM would be far less painful than losing to ASU. Since we probably will be recruiting in the same area they don't want to appear "worse than" App State...

That's the only reason I can think of...
Plain and simple - recruiting is the reason Wake will not schedule App. Secondly, they don't need the money. The Winston-Salem economy would love it. However, Wake Forest is an economy in and of itself. The only way an App-Wake game happens is when the big boosters get tired of looking at thousands of empty seats and force Wellman to make a change in scheduling.
Wake recruits Florida heavily according to their roster. They have some NC guys, but do not recruit the same people we do.
Bring Your A Game!

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Other Schools' Athletics”