Honestly, I’d probably trade ULM for La Tech, but don’t want them both. Maybe we can make some sort of trade with CUSA. ULM for one of their many sucky teams not Liberty.
Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
- NattyBumppo'sRevenge
- Posts: 3894
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 8:55 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Charlotte, NC
- Has thanked: 2082 times
- Been thanked: 2156 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
- NattyBumppo'sRevenge
- Posts: 3894
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 8:55 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Charlotte, NC
- Has thanked: 2082 times
- Been thanked: 2156 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
For those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
-
- Posts: 6882
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 955 times
- Been thanked: 1859 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
I don't think many of us had thought of adding Ohio until we found out they were interested. I don't know if the SBC reached out to them first or they reached out to us but I would not be opposed to them. I don't want them if we have to take La Tech though. There is absolutely no need for 3 teams from Louisiana. I hope App and at least 3-4 other schools are firm on this and say no to La Tech unless ULM leaves. We don't need both of those schools.NattyBumppo'sRevenge wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:14 pmFor those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
Last edited by AppStFan1 on Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1257
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:33 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 973 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
Won’t be Gillins callAppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:07 amI don't think many of us had thought of adding Ohio until we found out they were interested. I don't know if the SBC reached out to them first or they reached out to us but I would not be opposed to them. I don't want them if we have to take La Tech though. There is absolutely no need for 3 teams from Louisiana. I hope Gillin and at least 3-4 other schools are firm on this and say no to La Tech unless ULM leaves. We don't need both of those schools.NattyBumppo'sRevenge wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:14 pmFor those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
- JTApps1
- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:18 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Belmont
- Has thanked: 638 times
- Been thanked: 1197 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
I wonder how Norris is handling herself in this situation being so new? I don't think she'd be a pushover and vote for something that would hurt App, but I also doubt she wants to spend too much political capital right off the bat. I'm guessing she knows we got basically everything we asked for last go around so no need to make enemies over La Tech vs WKU.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:55 amWon’t be Gillins callAppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:07 amI don't think many of us had thought of adding Ohio until we found out they were interested. I don't know if the SBC reached out to them first or they reached out to us but I would not be opposed to them. I don't want them if we have to take La Tech though. There is absolutely no need for 3 teams from Louisiana. I hope Gillin and at least 3-4 other schools are firm on this and say no to La Tech unless ULM leaves. We don't need both of those schools.NattyBumppo'sRevenge wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:14 pmFor those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
-
- Posts: 1257
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:33 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 973 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
That would be a very reasonable approach for a new CEO.JTApps1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:29 amI wonder how Norris is handling herself in this situation being so new? I don't think she'd be a pushover and vote for something that would hurt App, but I also doubt she wants to spend too much political capital right off the bat. I'm guessing she knows we got basically everything we asked for last go around so no need to make enemies over La Tech vs WKU.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:55 amWon’t be Gillins callAppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:07 amI don't think many of us had thought of adding Ohio until we found out they were interested. I don't know if the SBC reached out to them first or they reached out to us but I would not be opposed to them. I don't want them if we have to take La Tech though. There is absolutely no need for 3 teams from Louisiana. I hope Gillin and at least 3-4 other schools are firm on this and say no to La Tech unless ULM leaves. We don't need both of those schools.NattyBumppo'sRevenge wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:14 pmFor those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
Also, it appears everyone is circling the 2030 timeframe for big conference moves. So anything that happens circa 2027 is very short timeframe.
- AtlAppMan
- Posts: 2239
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: ATL
- Has thanked: 110 times
- Been thanked: 1481 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
Even though we got what we wanted in last round there was a reason we did because it made a lot of sense. In addition, the results have proven it was a good move. I say that gives us even MORE leverage on the next round, not less, don't concede our leverage to a bunch of schools that did not do well BEFORE we arrived. App has made the SBC a much better conference and our continued guidance has proven to be a good. In simple terms, we pushed to add only schools that added net positive to our footprint, not adding crap schools just because they happen to be down the road from one of our least productive members.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 9:29 amThat would be a very reasonable approach for a new CEO.JTApps1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:29 amI wonder how Norris is handling herself in this situation being so new? I don't think she'd be a pushover and vote for something that would hurt App, but I also doubt she wants to spend too much political capital right off the bat. I'm guessing she knows we got basically everything we asked for last go around so no need to make enemies over La Tech vs WKU.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:55 amWon’t be Gillins callAppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:07 amI don't think many of us had thought of adding Ohio until we found out they were interested. I don't know if the SBC reached out to them first or they reached out to us but I would not be opposed to them. I don't want them if we have to take La Tech though. There is absolutely no need for 3 teams from Louisiana. I hope Gillin and at least 3-4 other schools are firm on this and say no to La Tech unless ULM leaves. We don't need both of those schools.NattyBumppo'sRevenge wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:14 pmFor those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
Also, it appears everyone is circling the 2030 timeframe for big conference moves. So anything that happens circa 2027 is very short timeframe.
In regards to Norris, I would not back down but rather step up and take the leadership role. Come in strong and don't let the others think she will be pushed around. Strong leadership will payoff for our school in the long run. Don't sit in the back of the room. Nobody puts baby in the corner.
-
- Posts: 6882
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 955 times
- Been thanked: 1859 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
I don't see a president and chancellor not consulting the athletic director on this. Don't you think? Heather has not been on job long enough to know as much on this stuff as Gillin would so I would think she would want his opinion.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:55 amWon’t be Gillins callAppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:07 amI don't think many of us had thought of adding Ohio until we found out they were interested. I don't know if the SBC reached out to them first or they reached out to us but I would not be opposed to them. I don't want them if we have to take La Tech though. There is absolutely no need for 3 teams from Louisiana. I hope Gillin and at least 3-4 other schools are firm on this and say no to La Tech unless ULM leaves. We don't need both of those schools.NattyBumppo'sRevenge wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:14 pmFor those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
Last edited by AppStFan1 on Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6882
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 955 times
- Been thanked: 1859 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
I completely understand about political capital but it is not like we pushed for a team in our own state that does not help the league in any way. What we wanted expanded the map, improved the athletics for the league, and improved it some financially. What we did was for the good of the SBC and what ULM wants only really helps them. The only way adding La Tech now benefits the SBC is if we drop ULM. We don't need 3 schools from that state unless we can add LSU. Gill really should go tell ULM that either we don't add La Tech or if they come in the league that ULM would have to leave. I have nothing personally against the schools but we need to see a revenue increase and this won't do that.JTApps1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:29 amI wonder how Norris is handling herself in this situation being so new? I don't think she'd be a pushover and vote for something that would hurt App, but I also doubt she wants to spend too much political capital right off the bat. I'm guessing she knows we got basically everything we asked for last go around so no need to make enemies over La Tech vs WKU.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:55 amWon’t be Gillins callAppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:07 amI don't think many of us had thought of adding Ohio until we found out they were interested. I don't know if the SBC reached out to them first or they reached out to us but I would not be opposed to them. I don't want them if we have to take La Tech though. There is absolutely no need for 3 teams from Louisiana. I hope Gillin and at least 3-4 other schools are firm on this and say no to La Tech unless ULM leaves. We don't need both of those schools.NattyBumppo'sRevenge wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:14 pmFor those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
-
- Posts: 6882
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 955 times
- Been thanked: 1859 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
I don't really want to make moves just for a 2-3 year period. I am thinking about that 2030-2031 window and hope that we either add game-changers to the SBC or we bolt with a few other schools and go join a better league or form a new league. I am seeing reports that schools want Gillin to show tangible data that prove adding La Tech helps our league. If there is legit data out there that they raise the revenue enough so we would make more than I am okay with it but I really doubt that is the case. I would rather add Ohio. They give us a new market by expanding map and they bring a good football and basketball program.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 9:29 amThat would be a very reasonable approach for a new CEO.JTApps1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:29 amI wonder how Norris is handling herself in this situation being so new? I don't think she'd be a pushover and vote for something that would hurt App, but I also doubt she wants to spend too much political capital right off the bat. I'm guessing she knows we got basically everything we asked for last go around so no need to make enemies over La Tech vs WKU.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:55 amWon’t be Gillins callAppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:07 amI don't think many of us had thought of adding Ohio until we found out they were interested. I don't know if the SBC reached out to them first or they reached out to us but I would not be opposed to them. I don't want them if we have to take La Tech though. There is absolutely no need for 3 teams from Louisiana. I hope Gillin and at least 3-4 other schools are firm on this and say no to La Tech unless ULM leaves. We don't need both of those schools.NattyBumppo'sRevenge wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:14 pmFor those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
Also, it appears everyone is circling the 2030 timeframe for big conference moves. So anything that happens circa 2027 is very short timeframe.
-
- Posts: 7127
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3455 times
- Been thanked: 4301 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
The Chancellor is representing and articulating the position of our University quite well , as I am told. And of course she is working hand in glove with our AD and others in the University power structure.
-
- Posts: 6882
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 955 times
- Been thanked: 1859 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
Love to hear that. That is why I said Gillin at first because I assumed she would be doing this. She can't just make an educated decision on her own. She definitely has to get input from the full power structure. I think the AD's voice has to carry huge weight in a decision like this.
-
- Posts: 7127
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3455 times
- Been thanked: 4301 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
Yes , of course. The AD , Chancellor and Board are aligned on this issue I am told.
-
- Posts: 6882
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 955 times
- Been thanked: 1859 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
Hope they stand firm here.
- JTApps1
- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:18 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Belmont
- Has thanked: 638 times
- Been thanked: 1197 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
Nobody available is going to boost the conference. We're picking from the tallest midget at this point. That's why I say there's no need to go too hard for or against one of the front runners. Make your thoughts on what is best known but don't be a PITA either. Besides, we'll be in a new conference before too long.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:12 amI completely understand about political capital but it is not like we pushed for a team in our own state that does not help the league in any way. What we wanted expanded the map, improved the athletics for the league, and improved it some financially. What we did was for the good of the SBC and what ULM wants only really helps them. The only way adding La Tech now benefits the SBC is if we drop ULM. We don't need 3 schools from that state unless we can add LSU. Gill really should go tell ULM that either we don't add La Tech or if they come in the league that ULM would have to leave. I have nothing personally against the schools but we need to see a revenue increase and this won't do that.JTApps1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:29 amI wonder how Norris is handling herself in this situation being so new? I don't think she'd be a pushover and vote for something that would hurt App, but I also doubt she wants to spend too much political capital right off the bat. I'm guessing she knows we got basically everything we asked for last go around so no need to make enemies over La Tech vs WKU.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:55 amWon’t be Gillins callAppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:07 amI don't think many of us had thought of adding Ohio until we found out they were interested. I don't know if the SBC reached out to them first or they reached out to us but I would not be opposed to them. I don't want them if we have to take La Tech though. There is absolutely no need for 3 teams from Louisiana. I hope Gillin and at least 3-4 other schools are firm on this and say no to La Tech unless ULM leaves. We don't need both of those schools.NattyBumppo'sRevenge wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:14 pmFor those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
-
- Posts: 11531
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7821 times
- Been thanked: 4957 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
Funny how much more smoothly thing run when everyone is working together.
-
- Posts: 1257
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:33 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 973 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
yeah I agree Gillin will be involved of course, but at the end of the day this is a CEO and institution decision and not an athletics decision.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 10:08 amI don't see a president and chancellor not consulting the athletic director on this. Don't you think? Heather has not been on job long enough to know as much on this stuff as Gillin would so I would think she would want his opinion.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:55 amWon’t be Gillins callAppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:07 amI don't think many of us had thought of adding Ohio until we found out they were interested. I don't know if the SBC reached out to them first or they reached out to us but I would not be opposed to them. I don't want them if we have to take La Tech though. There is absolutely no need for 3 teams from Louisiana. I hope Gillin and at least 3-4 other schools are firm on this and say no to La Tech unless ULM leaves. We don't need both of those schools.NattyBumppo'sRevenge wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 9:14 pmFor those wanting Ohio, they have apparently been approached by Sun Belt.
- AppWyo
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:25 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 536 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
unless they succumb to group think. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-groupthink-2795213
-
- Posts: 7127
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3455 times
- Been thanked: 4301 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
La Tech has the minimum number of votes needed.Negotiations are ongoing.
- Bootsy
- Posts: 1712
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2020 12:28 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 478 times
- Been thanked: 1101 times
Re: Texas State "heavy favorite" to join Pac-12, LaTech favored to join Sun Belt
Is it possible ULM is currently thinking “me first” because they realize they need to right the ship before the a new TV deal is negotiated?
If this is the case, maybe ULM also considers replacing that color palette/logo that look like they were created by a 3rd grader with a trial subscription to MS Paint?
If this is the case, maybe ULM also considers replacing that color palette/logo that look like they were created by a 3rd grader with a trial subscription to MS Paint?