Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
couple of Marshall fans have said they believe next year the state is going to make major cuts to the budget, they are assuming it will include funding to their collage. If their correct, I could see why their administration might be more willing to atleast consider a regional conference. As far as UNCC, deep down, their administration knows they need us, their fans know they need us, but right now, and I mean for the next couple of years, their going to thumb their nose at the idea of being in a conference with App. But we all know, if they keep losing, not only in football but other sports, their attendance will hit rock bottom, revenue streams will dry up, expenses will keep rising, and then I think they will swallow their pride, and finally sit down and talk to us.
- APPdiesel
- Posts: 2691
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:53 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 823 times
- Been thanked: 1524 times
- Contact:
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
BigDaddyG: I read somewhere that it's essentially the reverse of moving up. Assuming they have a conference that wants them (and they do, Big Sky), they have 2 years to reach the 63 scholarship limit. Graduation should take care of most of that, transfers a few more, and if necessary, pulling scholarships from a few. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
JTApps1 - do you have a link? I'd love to read what they're saying.
twitter.com/DieselOnRadio
JTApps1 - do you have a link? I'd love to read what they're saying.
twitter.com/DieselOnRadio
Sports talk host & content creator on The Fan Upstate, 97.7 FM Greenville/97.1 FM Spartanburg/FREE AUDACY APP.
http://www.twitter.com/dieselonradio
http://www.twitter.com/dieselonradio
- JTApps1
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:18 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Belmont
- Has thanked: 667 times
- Been thanked: 1239 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
Here is the link to the thread about the TV rights. http://csnbbs.com/thread-766422.htmlAPPdiesel wrote:BigDaddyG: I read somewhere that it's essentially the reverse of moving up. Assuming they have a conference that wants them (and they do, Big Sky), they have 2 years to reach the 63 scholarship limit. Graduation should take care of most of that, transfers a few more, and if necessary, pulling scholarships from a few. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
JTApps1 - do you have a link? I'd love to read what they're saying.
twitter.com/DieselOnRadio
- APPdiesel
- Posts: 2691
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:53 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 823 times
- Been thanked: 1524 times
- Contact:
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
Haha, I read through a lot of those (mostly skimmed for references to App) but everyone there is thinking small. Thinking that adding a team here, or chopping a team there is going to save their collective behinds. It won't. It's exactly the mentality that made these far flung conferences happen in the first place.JTApps1 wrote:Here is the link to the thread about the TV rights. http://csnbbs.com/thread-766422.html
Sports talk host & content creator on The Fan Upstate, 97.7 FM Greenville/97.1 FM Spartanburg/FREE AUDACY APP.
http://www.twitter.com/dieselonradio
http://www.twitter.com/dieselonradio
-
- Posts: 7799
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1018 times
- Been thanked: 949 times
- Contact:
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
So we could be playing a possible 14 games. That being 12 regular season games, 1 championship game, and a bowl game?AppGrad78 wrote:From Twitter:
NCAA @NCAA
DI Council approves proposal allowing FBS conferences without 12 members to hold conference championship football games.
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
-
- Posts: 1388
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:47 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 414 times
- Been thanked: 464 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
Don't be such a pessimist. 15 games if you consider the playoff.NewApp wrote:So we could be playing a possible 14 games. That being 12 regular season games, 1 championship game, and a bowl game?AppGrad78 wrote:From Twitter:
NCAA @NCAA
DI Council approves proposal allowing FBS conferences without 12 members to hold conference championship football games.

-
- Posts: 7799
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1018 times
- Been thanked: 949 times
- Contact:
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
Not a pessimist; just an observation.MDaniels84 wrote:Don't be such a pessimist. 15 games if you consider the playoff.NewApp wrote:So we could be playing a possible 14 games. That being 12 regular season games, 1 championship game, and a bowl game?AppGrad78 wrote:From Twitter:
NCAA @NCAA
DI Council approves proposal allowing FBS conferences without 12 members to hold conference championship football games.

NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:15 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 787 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
And?NewApp wrote:So we could be playing a possible 14 games. That being 12 regular season games, 1 championship game, and a bowl game?AppGrad78 wrote:From Twitter:
NCAA @NCAA
DI Council approves proposal allowing FBS conferences without 12 members to hold conference championship football games.
- Nugget49
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:16 pm
- School: Charlotte
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
I have not gone back to re-read this thread from the beginning, but has it morphed from what to do if Idaho gets the boot, to realignment rationalization? Yeah, that happens on our board too.moehler wrote:couple of Marshall fans have said they believe next year the state is going to make major cuts to the budget, they are assuming it will include funding to their collage. If their correct, I could see why their administration might be more willing to atleast consider a regional conference. As far as UNCC, deep down, their administration knows they need us, their fans know they need us, but right now, and I mean for the next couple of years, their going to thumb their nose at the idea of being in a conference with App. But we all know, if they keep losing, not only in football but other sports, their attendance will hit rock bottom, revenue streams will dry up, expenses will keep rising, and then I think they will swallow their pride, and finally sit down and talk to us.
I think we have to start with the understanding that message board talk about realignment is all about what we want, and not what is possible or likely. For Charlotte I think that means the AAC, or the P5 (dreaming--see what I mean). Only an all-conferences gut job would offer anything else to us. I would point out that Charlotte has been flying cross-country to play volleyball, etc. since 1991 (maybe 1976). We are okay with this, can afford it, and it will not move us towards regionalization. However, if a G5 regionalization did happen, and we could put together App, Charlotte, and ECU as the center of the conference geographically I think it would be good start. I do not think regular realignment gets us there--meaning the Big 12 takes somebody from the AAC, who raids C-USA, who looks to the Sun Belt--you know, what we have already seen. I am talking about all G-5 Presidents/Chancellors getting together and starting with a clean sheet of paper. So basically, I don't think this is happening.
-
- Posts: 6799
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Raleigh
- Has thanked: 3382 times
- Been thanked: 2955 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
I have a hard time envisioning the scenario that would lead to that happening either. It is a popular theory on this board, though. Would love to see it become reality.Nugget49 wrote:I have not gone back to re-read this thread from the beginning, but has it morphed from what to do if Idaho gets the boot, to realignment rationalization? Yeah, that happens on our board too.moehler wrote:couple of Marshall fans have said they believe next year the state is going to make major cuts to the budget, they are assuming it will include funding to their collage. If their correct, I could see why their administration might be more willing to atleast consider a regional conference. As far as UNCC, deep down, their administration knows they need us, their fans know they need us, but right now, and I mean for the next couple of years, their going to thumb their nose at the idea of being in a conference with App. But we all know, if they keep losing, not only in football but other sports, their attendance will hit rock bottom, revenue streams will dry up, expenses will keep rising, and then I think they will swallow their pride, and finally sit down and talk to us.
I think we have to start with the understanding that message board talk about realignment is all about what we want, and not what is possible or likely. For Charlotte I think that means the AAC, or the P5 (dreaming--see what I mean). Only an all-conferences gut job would offer anything else to us. I would point out that Charlotte has been flying cross-country to play volleyball, etc. since 1991 (maybe 1976). We are okay with this, can afford it, and it will not move us towards regionalization. However, if a G5 regionalization did happen, and we could put together App, Charlotte, and ECU as the center of the conference geographically I think it would be good start. I do not think regular realignment gets us there--meaning the Big 12 takes somebody from the AAC, who raids C-USA, who looks to the Sun Belt--you know, what we have already seen. I am talking about all G-5 Presidents/Chancellors getting together and starting with a clean sheet of paper. So basically, I don't think this is happening.
-
- Posts: 4829
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1554 times
- Been thanked: 1745 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
Moving a volley ball team and moving a football team are worlds apart. You can move the volleyball team for less than just the food bill for football.Nugget49 wrote:I have not gone back to re-read this thread from the beginning, but has it morphed from what to do if Idaho gets the boot, to realignment rationalization? Yeah, that happens on our board too.moehler wrote:couple of Marshall fans have said they believe next year the state is going to make major cuts to the budget, they are assuming it will include funding to their collage. If their correct, I could see why their administration might be more willing to atleast consider a regional conference. As far as UNCC, deep down, their administration knows they need us, their fans know they need us, but right now, and I mean for the next couple of years, their going to thumb their nose at the idea of being in a conference with App. But we all know, if they keep losing, not only in football but other sports, their attendance will hit rock bottom, revenue streams will dry up, expenses will keep rising, and then I think they will swallow their pride, and finally sit down and talk to us.
I think we have to start with the understanding that message board talk about realignment is all about what we want, and not what is possible or likely. For Charlotte I think that means the AAC, or the P5 (dreaming--see what I mean). Only an all-conferences gut job would offer anything else to us. I would point out that Charlotte has been flying cross-country to play volleyball, etc. since 1991 (maybe 1976). We are okay with this, can afford it, and it will not move us towards regionalization. However, if a G5 regionalization did happen, and we could put together App, Charlotte, and ECU as the center of the conference geographically I think it would be good start. I do not think regular realignment gets us there--meaning the Big 12 takes somebody from the AAC, who raids C-USA, who looks to the Sun Belt--you know, what we have already seen. I am talking about all G-5 Presidents/Chancellors getting together and starting with a clean sheet of paper. So basically, I don't think this is happening.
-
- Posts: 4829
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1554 times
- Been thanked: 1745 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
What I would really like to see is drop half the bowl games and make them really mean something. I have confidence we can do that year in and year out. Needing 6 wins is way too low a bar for our program. Talk about swallowing pride for some of these teams to go FCS. I would have to swallow an awful lot of pride to go to a bowl game with 6 wins. OR oh my lord how do I even say this....... 5 wins?
-
- Posts: 7799
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1018 times
- Been thanked: 949 times
- Contact:
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
It was a question, hence the question mark.Yosef10 wrote:And?NewApp wrote:So we could be playing a possible 14 games. That being 12 regular season games, 1 championship game, and a bowl game?AppGrad78 wrote:From Twitter:
NCAA @NCAA
DI Council approves proposal allowing FBS conferences without 12 members to hold conference championship football games.
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
-
- Posts: 7799
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1018 times
- Been thanked: 949 times
- Contact:
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
bbcoach, weren't there one or two 5-7 teams in bowl games this go round.bcoach wrote:What I would really like to see is drop half the bowl games and make them really mean something. I have confidence we can do that year in and year out. Needing 6 wins is way too low a bar for our program. Talk about swallowing pride for some of these teams to go FCS. I would have to swallow an awful lot of pride to go to a bowl game with 6 wins. OR oh my lord how do I even say this....... 5 wins?
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
- McLeansvilleAppFan
- Posts: 9586
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Greensboro (McLeansville) NC
- Has thanked: 4536 times
- Been thanked: 2265 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
I thought it was three teams with 5 wins. It might have been two but I do think they all won their bowl game as well.NewApp wrote:bbcoach, weren't there one or two 5-7 teams in bowl games this go round.bcoach wrote:What I would really like to see is drop half the bowl games and make them really mean something. I have confidence we can do that year in and year out. Needing 6 wins is way too low a bar for our program. Talk about swallowing pride for some of these teams to go FCS. I would have to swallow an awful lot of pride to go to a bowl game with 6 wins. OR oh my lord how do I even say this....... 5 wins?
This is my very generic signature added to each post.
-
- Posts: 4829
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1554 times
- Been thanked: 1745 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
I believe there were three. It is starting to be "everybody gets a trophy". I know it isn't, but I wish it was an indication of a good season and not just a way to line some guys pockets.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote:I thought it was three teams with 5 wins. It might have been two but I do think they all won their bowl game as well.NewApp wrote:bbcoach, weren't there one or two 5-7 teams in bowl games this go round.bcoach wrote:What I would really like to see is drop half the bowl games and make them really mean something. I have confidence we can do that year in and year out. Needing 6 wins is way too low a bar for our program. Talk about swallowing pride for some of these teams to go FCS. I would have to swallow an awful lot of pride to go to a bowl game with 6 wins. OR oh my lord how do I even say this....... 5 wins?
Look at the season we had last year and we got the same reward a team with 5 win got.
- appst89
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10136
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 410 times
- Been thanked: 2613 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
Three 5-7 teams went to bowl games this year; 5-7 San Jose St. defeated Georgia St., 5-7 Minnesota defeated Central Michigan and 5-7 Nebraska defeated UCLA.
- McLeansvilleAppFan
- Posts: 9586
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Greensboro (McLeansville) NC
- Has thanked: 4536 times
- Been thanked: 2265 times
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
But do you really think a 10-2 G5 school would get a bowl game over a Prig5 school with a 7-5 record if there were less bowls.? I bet you would see a lot of deserving G5 schools not in a bowl at all so the SEC could get 5 or 6 schools in a bowl. I would prefer a smaller number of bowls but only if the bowls are done in a way to make sure final records play a huge part and not just conference affiliation.bcoach wrote:I believe there were three. It is starting to be "everybody gets a trophy". I know it isn't, but I wish it was an indication of a good season and not just a way to line some guys pockets.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote:I thought it was three teams with 5 wins. It might have been two but I do think they all won their bowl game as well.NewApp wrote:bbcoach, weren't there one or two 5-7 teams in bowl games this go round.bcoach wrote:What I would really like to see is drop half the bowl games and make them really mean something. I have confidence we can do that year in and year out. Needing 6 wins is way too low a bar for our program. Talk about swallowing pride for some of these teams to go FCS. I would have to swallow an awful lot of pride to go to a bowl game with 6 wins. OR oh my lord how do I even say this....... 5 wins?
Look at the season we had last year and we got the same reward a team with 5 win got.
This is my very generic signature added to each post.
-
- Posts: 7799
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1018 times
- Been thanked: 949 times
- Contact:
Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
Good grief, McLeansvilleApp. 3 five win teams, was worse than I thought, but if it's true they won their 3 bowls out of the 40, that's commendable.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote:I thought it was three teams with 5 wins. It might have been two but I do think they all won their bowl game as well.NewApp wrote:bbcoach, weren't there one or two 5-7 teams in bowl games this go round.bcoach wrote:What I would really like to see is drop half the bowl games and make them really mean something. I have confidence we can do that year in and year out. Needing 6 wins is way too low a bar for our program. Talk about swallowing pride for some of these teams to go FCS. I would have to swallow an awful lot of pride to go to a bowl game with 6 wins. OR oh my lord how do I even say this....... 5 wins?
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
-
- Posts: 2492
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:00 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 238 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
Re: RE: Re: Possible Plan of Idaho if kicked out of SunBelt
I agree, we would lose in a scenario with less bowls if it were at large selection. I would like to see conference champions go to major bowls and then have less conference tie-in bowls. Set bar higher than 6 wins for sure. Although it looks like there will at least one more bowl in 2016. I somehow missed that the medal of honor bowl would now be a traditional bowl played on December 18 in Charleston. Anybody now what the tie-ins will be? Nice destination on my birthday!!!McLeansvilleAppFan wrote:But do you really think a 10-2 G5 school would get a bowl game over a Prig5 school with a 7-5 record if there were less bowls.? I bet you would see a lot of deserving G5 schools not in a bowl at all so the SEC could get 5 or 6 schools in a bowl. I would prefer a smaller number of bowls but only if the bowls are done in a way to make sure final records play a huge part and not just conference affiliation.bcoach wrote:I believe there were three. It is starting to be "everybody gets a trophy". I know it isn't, but I wish it was an indication of a good season and not just a way to line some guys pockets.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote:I thought it was three teams with 5 wins. It might have been two but I do think they all won their bowl game as well.NewApp wrote:bbcoach, weren't there one or two 5-7 teams in bowl games this go round.bcoach wrote:What I would really like to see is drop half the bowl games and make them really mean something. I have confidence we can do that year in and year out. Needing 6 wins is way too low a bar for our program. Talk about swallowing pride for some of these teams to go FCS. I would have to swallow an awful lot of pride to go to a bowl game with 6 wins. OR oh my lord how do I even say this....... 5 wins?
Look at the season we had last year and we got the same reward a team with 5 win got.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk