PhillyApp1 wrote:Can someone copy and paste the article?
It wasn't my idea.
I wish it had been, but I honestly didn't think of it first.
Darn it.
So, now, I can't take credit for this brilliant concept. Instead, the praise goes to my old buddy Will Prewitt. He and I worked together back in the days of the late, great West Virginia Conference.
For 12 years, Prewitt served as associate commissioner. Then, in 2010 he became commissioner of a new NCAA Division II league named the Great American Conference. He has been there ever since.
Considering his experience, naturally, Prewitt has some informed opinions about the composition of conferences. So, when he read my "Maybe MU should have stayed in the MAC" column, it got Prewitt to thinking.
Voila.
The next thing I knew Prewitt had come up with not one, but two NCAA Division I conferences comprised of a combination of Conference USA and Sun Belt schools.
The first league includes Marshall, Western Kentucky, Middle Tennessee, Old Dominion, FIU, Florida Atlantic, Charlotte, Appalachian State, Georgia Southern, Georgia State, Coastal Carolina and James Madison.
Not bad, huh?
Why, the 12-school league even divides up nicely into North and South Divisions.
The North would include Marshall, Western Kentucky, Appalachian State, Old Dominion, Charlotte and James Madison.
How's that for regional rivalries, Marshall fans?
Then, the South Division would have Middle Tennessee, Georgia Southern, Georgia State, FIU, Florida Atlantic and Coastal Carolina.
Now, let's think about a name for this conference.
How about the Southern Conference? Oops, already taken. What about the Southeastern Conference? Darn, it's taken, too. It could be called the Mid-Atlantic Conference, but then its MAC acronym would get confused with the Mid-American Conference.
Ah, let's just call it the Sunshine Conference for now.
The second league is a 14-school conference including Southern Miss, UAB, Louisiana Tech, Rice, UTEP, North Texas, UTSA, UL-Monroe, UL-Lafayette, South Alabama, Troy, Texas State, Arkansas State and New Mexico State.
It also breaks down into natural, geographical divisions.
The East would include all the Alabama and Louisiana schools, such as Louisiana Tech, UL-Monroe, UL-Lafayette, UAB, Troy, South Alabama and, of course, Southern Miss.
The West Division would look like a mini-Southwest Conference with UTEP, Rice, UTSA, North Texas, Texas State, Arkansas State and New Mexico State.
What could we call this league?
Well, the Southwest Conference moniker hasn't been used since 1996, so let's dust it off and use it again.
Nice job, Will.
The Sunshine Conference and the SWC configurations make a lot of sense. And it would be doable if C-USA and the Sun Belt would merge for the good of both leagues.
After all, right now C-USA and the Sun Belt are at the bottom of the FBS food chain. They are at the foot of the ladder looking up at the other eight conferences that have stronger reputations and fatter wallets.
That's partially because C-USA and the Sun Belt were the leagues that were raided the hardest in the most recent conference reconfiguration. C-USA lost seven members to the American Athletic Conference, so C-USA raided the Sun Belt for replacements.
So, isn't it about time these two leagues banded together and looked out for each other?
I believe it's an idea worth considering.
Chuck Landon is a sports columnist for The Herald-Dispatch. Contact him at
clandon@herald-dispatch.com.