Maddog1956 wrote:Black Saturday wrote:asutrnr81 wrote:Black Saturday wrote:Rigor and challenge vary by class, by instructor, by each high school, and etc. How do colleges equally measure among candidates?
"they" unweight the GPA!
How do "they" compare kids with unweighted 4.0s? or less?
I'll stand by my original statement of leveling the playing field with the entrance exams when comparing students. Not all high schools are created equally.
why are involved students with top grades along with entrance exam scores above a certain number invited to apply for the prestigious scholarships and those students with only the top grades not invited?
Even within certain schools there are different "classes" many urban schools have a "school within a school". One economic group takes mostly college prep and the other takes easy classes. The school can be rated very high but for an individual student the grades mean really nothing.
I'm not against using the SAT even if it doesn't tell if a student is necessarily going to attend classes, party all night or is a hard worker, but I would just like it stated as such. What's wrong in stating 90% of our criteria is SAT (for example). The only problem (and the reason for keeping it cloudy) is that it would eliminate most of the admissions office and then they would have to explain the exceptions.
I do not have "the" checklist but I am close enough to the process at several schools to speak to this.
I can promise you it is a multifaceted filter. What "counts" more from one might not mean as much for the other.
The SAT would be a good first filter for the office. Those high SAT's are then screened for honors and AP classes with an UNWEIGHTED GPA.
Why unwweighted: Because there is SOOOOOO much difference between an AP course at one school to another. And it levels the playing field.
Weighted GPA might be another filter especially for those with 5.0+ because it shows that the kids took the toughest classes they could.
A third filter would be extra-curriculars. Trust me a Gold award, Eagle Scout, "missionary work" All-State rankings in academic competitions, holding office in a club or organization at the school or community, and the like will influence the process.
Another filter would be legacy, I am sure giving a high level influences, but for most it in not even on the table.
Another filter and maybe the most important is advocacy. Self, Parent and others. If you do not get what you want or believe is right or have new information. Call, write, etc. One of the MOST common errors is incomplete applications. Something is missing. Lately I have had to "resubmit" electronic letters etc. (At many universities). A piece of advice is a personalize letter of recommendation, giving the person writing it your resume, etc. will be best.....and personalized is not changing the name at the top and the person recommending filling in blanks. Find someone who will be genuine. Your guidance counselor may have to write 75...it is hard to be personal for 75 people if 15 of them are applying to the same school.
App74 wrote:As much as I dislike it, the SAT is the barometer. There are some 13,000 applicants and nine admission counselors.
I sent two letters. The first was telling them that the early admission program was a stupid idea. If App is still doing that, it is still a stupid idea. Whomever came up with that needs to take the SAT.
The second letter was a bit of a plea to reconsider her application. Fortunately, we had just received her ACT score. She rocked the ACT, knocked it out. I included an "unofficial" copy of the ACT score. She was accepted a couple of weeks later.
Black Saturday is correct. Parents must help prospective students with preparation. Navigate the SAT abyss with classes on how to take the SAT.
In order for APP to be competitive they HAVE to have the early admissions piece and they WILL treat those kids and families differently! They also have to have a filter and the SAT/ACT is the ONLY really controlled element that they have. (I hate the SAT) But it is a controlled element that fits on a bell curve well because with 13,000 + applications you have to "rank" the applicants some way.
Regardless of where a university starts there has to be filters that the applications go through. There just has to be. Where one starts will probably in the end lead to the same conclusion! ....and it IS a multifaceted view....and "they" miss some!