App ranked by Forbes 18th best buy college in US.

http://www.forbes.com/pictures/eidm45fg ... niversity/

Maddog1956 wrote:App ranked by Forbes 18th best buy college in US.

http://www.forbes.com/pictures/eidm45fg ... niversity/

Wonder how UNCC folks feel about these rankings; considering what a leading national research institution they believe they have? jk

Who cares what they think? They're subhuman.

Way to go App

asu66 wrote:

Maddog1956 wrote:App ranked by Forbes 18th best buy college in US.

http://www.forbes.com/pictures/eidm45fg ... niversity/

Wonder how UNCC folks feel about these rankings; considering what a leading national research institution they believe they have? jk

asu66 wrote:

Maddog1956 wrote:App ranked by Forbes 18th best buy college in US.

http://www.forbes.com/pictures/eidm45fg ... niversity/

Wonder how UNCC folks feel about these rankings; considering what a leading national research institution they believe they have? jk

(BUMP for UNCC trolls)

Having proven our superiority over the 'Giners yet again; I have to admit that I was astonished at our overall ranking of No. 452. Yikes. Sure, we were ahead of Charlotte, Wilmington and Asheville by a good bit, but we're all pretty far back there. That doesn't really make the UNC system seem like the string of pearls it's made out to be. I blame budget cuts. Rabble Rabble.

I don't understand the rankings Forbes does. Some of the schools ranked ahead of us are ridiculous. I can't see how we can have almost identical statistics (SAT, Acceptance Rate, etc.) as JMU, yet they're at 138, while we're all the way back at 452. Even C of C, and El Cid, both of which we're usually compared favorably to, are significantly ahead of us

BurlingtonApp wrote:I don't understand the rankings Forbes does. Some of the schools ranked ahead of us are ridiculous. I can't see how we can have almost identical statistics (SAT, Acceptance Rate, etc.) as JMU, yet they're at 138, while we're all the way back at 452. Even C of C, and El Cid, both of which we're usually compared favorably to, are significantly ahead of us

Here are the factors, but while they say they are looking at "output" over "input" (ROI), if you don't look at the kids going in how do you judge the university "effect" on output? For example, your dad owns the company, you go to a college and come out as CEO, did the college have any effect on the output? Students loans is a big factor also so if you have lots of poorer kids it works against you. One reason private colleges do so well. Plus 22.5% is Student Satisfaction, lol.

That's why I think the Affordability ranking is more important. It gets at the point of whoever you are which college is going to give you more bang for the buck.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinehow ... eges-2013/

For the sixth year, FORBES has partnered with the Washington, D.C.-based Center for College Affordability and Productivity (CCAP) for The Top Colleges in the U.S. The FORBES list of 650 schools distinguishes itself from competitors by our belief in “output” over “input.” We’re not all that interested in what gets a student into college, like our peers who focus heavily on selectivity metrics such as high school class rank, SAT scores and the like. Our sights are set directly on ROI: What are students getting out of college?