No pass rush

ASUPATCH · Unread post by **ASUPATCH** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:33 pm

Boy this guy may have helped down the stretch. http://www.csurams.com/sports/m-footbl/ ... 12aab.html

GlassOnion · Unread post by **GlassOnion** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:43 pm

Meh. Just 3 sacks and 3.5 TFL as a senior DE?

Im not impressed. Certainly not enough to have kept him hear and risked more bad publicity. CSU is one of the worst teams in the country anyway.

ASUPATCH · Unread post by **ASUPATCH** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:47 pm

77 tackles from the DE position is insane. I think he missed 1-2 games as well.

Gonzo · Unread post by **Gonzo** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:53 pm

He was very good and very innocent.

We got the bad end of that deal. No was around that fact.

GlassOnion · Unread post by **GlassOnion** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:03 pm

He wouldnt have played DE if he stayed here anyways. Dale Jones had him lined up as a 250 lb DT.

ASUPATCH · Unread post by **ASUPATCH** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:03 pm

GlassOnion wrote:Meh. Just 3 sacks and 3.5 TFL as a senior DE?

Im not impressed. Certainly not enough to have kept him hear and risked more bad publicity. CSU is one of the worst teams in the country anyway.

CSU was 4-8. You have them confused with the 1-11 CU team.

GlassOnion · Unread post by **GlassOnion** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:04 pm

ASUPATCH wrote:
GlassOnion wrote:Meh. Just 3 sacks and 3.5 TFL as a senior DE?

Im not impressed. Certainly not enough to have kept him hear and risked more bad publicity. CSU is one of the worst teams in the country anyway.
CSU was 4-8. You have them confused with the 1-11 CU team.

No I didnt. Theyre ranked near 100 in defense in the nation.

ASUPATCH · Unread post by **ASUPATCH** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:10 pm

GlassOnion wrote:
ASUPATCH wrote:
GlassOnion wrote:Meh. Just 3 sacks and 3.5 TFL as a senior DE?

Im not impressed. Certainly not enough to have kept him hear and risked more bad publicity. CSU is one of the worst teams in the country anyway.
CSU was 4-8. You have them confused with the 1-11 CU team.
No I didnt. Theyre ranked near 100 in defense in the nation.

Last I checked 68th is no where near 100.
http://statistics.ncaafootball.com/merg ... taldef.htm

GlassOnion · Unread post by **GlassOnion** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:15 pm

ASUPATCH wrote:
GlassOnion wrote:
ASUPATCH wrote:
GlassOnion wrote:Meh. Just 3 sacks and 3.5 TFL as a senior DE?

Im not impressed. Certainly not enough to have kept him hear and risked more bad publicity. CSU is one of the worst teams in the country anyway.
CSU was 4-8. You have them confused with the 1-11 CU team.
No I didnt. Theyre ranked near 100 in defense in the nation.
Last I checked 68th is no where near 100.
http://statistics.ncaafootball.com/merg ... taldef.htm

And 105th in rushing D, 78th in sacks, and 111th in tackles for loss.

27th in pass D helps the Total D rank, but couple that with the other numbers and it tells me that their secondary guys are good, but line play is poor.

GlassOnion · Unread post by **GlassOnion** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:17 pm

I do agree however, that Tanyi opposite of Blair would have been a good line for us. But not Tanyi as a NT, which was Dale Jones' plan. I just dont think Tanyi was worth the risk to the program.

Gonzo · Unread post by **Gonzo** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:26 pm

GlassOnion wrote:I do agree however, that Tanyi opposite of Blair would have been a good line for us. But not Tanyi as a NT, which was Dale Jones' plan. I just dont think Tanyi was worth the risk to the program.

Agree that it was a liability, but I'd like to point out that nothing more than unfounded false accusations are what made him a liability, so I was happy to see him successful at CSU.

It was a very sad turn of events. Scary what a few words can do to someone's life.

GlassOnion · Unread post by **GlassOnion** » Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:37 pm

Gonzo wrote:
GlassOnion wrote:I do agree however, that Tanyi opposite of Blair would have been a good line for us. But not Tanyi as a NT, which was Dale Jones' plan. I just dont think Tanyi was worth the risk to the program.
Agree that it was a liability, but I'd like to point out that nothing more than unfounded false accusations are what made him a liability, so I was happy to see him successful at CSU.

It was a very sad turn of events. Scary what a few words can do to someone's life.

I agree x100. No way such an issue as that should have been placed before a student court. Ever. There is a principle to people are innocent until proven guilty, and the right to confront their accuser and provide evidence and witnesses.

appbio91 · Unread post by **appbio91** » Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:24 pm

Gonzo wrote:He was very good and very innocent.

We got the bad end of that deal. No was around that fact.

I pray to God no one takes this bait

appbio91 · Unread post by **appbio91** » Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:26 pm

appbio91 wrote:
Gonzo wrote:He was very good and very innocent.

We got the bad end of that deal. No was around that fact.
I pray to God no one takes this bait

Too late.....

mountaineerman · Unread post by **mountaineerman** » Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:40 pm

I agree pass rush needs to be top priority we havent sacked anybody on third down since merrell hunter. top priority also needs to be some big run stuffers on interior d line if we continue with this three four mess.

Gonzo · Unread post by **Gonzo** » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:36 pm

appbio91 wrote:
appbio91 wrote:
Gonzo wrote:He was very good and very innocent.

We got the bad end of that deal. No was around that fact.
I pray to God no one takes this bait
Too late.....

Having fun talking to yourself buddy?

No pass rush

No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Re: No pass rush

Login • Register