APPARJ wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:35 am
appgrouch wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2017 9:04 am
Rick83 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2017 7:28 am
appgrouch wrote: ↑Fri Nov 03, 2017 7:03 am
Goapps15 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 02, 2017 1:54 pm
Without athletics this university wouldn't be anywhere close to what it is academically now.
If football was disbanded tomorrow, the academics would be fine.
Instead of still paying off the debt on KBS, we could be upgrading classrooms and creating better opportunities for students.
If football was disbanded you'd see a dramatic drop in student applications and a drop in alumni involvement. The Michigan win along with the 3 national championships put App on the map and prospective student interest surged dramatically. Keeping alumni engaged through something like a great football program keeps us interested and gets us up the mountain to see what's happening and leads to academic contributions.
Fewer students means less state funding and less tuition and fees collected which means a smaller budget to do all of those great things needed for academics.
Applications have been over enrollment since at least the 80's.
The growth that App has had is nothing to due with football. The State/System MANDATED that all the system schools had to increase their enrollment each year. This started in the 90's.
There is some cross over between athletics giving and other giving, but not near all give to both.
$16+ Million Dollars a year (($380 Fee + $124 Debt) x 2 x 16600 undergrads) of athletic fees could be used a lot of other places.
I'm stunned to see someone publicly post that football hasn't impacted the growth in enrollment and quality of applicants. It's an objective fact.
I did not say anything about Quality, or the number of applicants increasing. Except for 3 years, the growth and projected growth has stayed at between 1% - 2% for a 15 - 20 year period. Back in 2000 we were going to a projected/targeted enrollment of at least 20,000 students by 2025. This was a target handed down from the system.
Has football put our name out there more? Yes
Has football caused us to accept more students? No
Has football caused us to get moved up on some people's lists? Yes
Has football contributed to new degrees or programs? No
Has football gotten us more state money for advancement? No
Has football run up the University's debt spending? Yes (Debt Reduction Spending per year: $124 Athletics vs $165 Rest of Campus)
App State Teachers College was founded to provide trained educators for mountain areas that were underserved.
For the record:
I am not against Athletics/Football
I am not against Academics
I am generally of the opinion that when we have a major issue, or something that get elevated to that level, we should lean to the side of the mission of the university.
Years ago this board was calling for a common exam for most of the Freshmen and Sophomore business students that had been scheduled for a weeknight for 6 months to be rescheduled so Raley could be used for tailgating for a first round playoff game that got scheduled a week prior.
I am going to stop wasting my digital breath on this now.
That's what I do. I gripe and I know things.