#14

appstcyclist
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:50 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 14 times

#14

Unread post by appstcyclist » Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:42 pm

Sean Price continues to impress and could set records at App. He has the potential to become one of the App all time greats. Will he continue to wear #14, or will App finally retire the jersey. Does anyone have any information on this?

High Country Student
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:28 am
School: Appalachian State
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: #14

Unread post by High Country Student » Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:08 am

appstcyclist wrote:Sean Price continues to impress and could set records at App. He has the potential to become one of the App all time greats. Will he continue to wear #14, or will App finally retire the jersey. Does anyone have any information on this?
Better yet, can it just become a requirement that in order to wear #14 you have to be extremely talented as the last two guys to wear the number have been! :D

User avatar
GoApps70
Posts: 622
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 1:03 pm
School: Appalachian State
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: #14

Unread post by GoApps70 » Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:44 pm

Not really in favor of "retiring" a number. Hard to really do when you are running a program. Retiring a jersey, OK. But do not want to retire the number. Some schools have lost potentially great players because they felt like they had to wear a certain number.
==========================================================================
Give 'em Hell Apps !.....Sun Belt future champs !........Enlarge Kidd Brewer ASAP!
==========================================================================

User avatar
AppStateNews
Posts: 2736
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:36 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 220 times
Been thanked: 2289 times

Re: #14

Unread post by AppStateNews » Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:22 pm

FWIW, I have heard Price will be wearing #10 this year.. not trying to start rumors or anything, just relaying what I have heard through the grapevine.
tAPPedInSports.net

Not affiliated with the above website

JMappfan5
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:31 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1243 times
Been thanked: 496 times

Re: #14

Unread post by JMappfan5 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 6:21 am

I heard that he was just gonna wear an "S" across his chest!!! :lol:

User avatar
bh2oson
Posts: 1300
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:06 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Huntersville,NC
Has thanked: 655 times
Been thanked: 224 times

Re: #14

Unread post by bh2oson » Wed Mar 13, 2013 6:58 pm

AppStateCentral wrote:FWIW, I have heard Price will be wearing #10 this year.. not trying to start rumors or anything, just relaying what I have heard through the grapevine.
Dang - thought I could wear the old Armanti jersey 3 more years.

User avatar
vegattk
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:08 pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: #14

Unread post by vegattk » Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:10 pm

I'm on that also agrees that you shouldn't retire numbers...

BUT DOG-GONE-IT.. If #14 hasn't earned it with 2 National Championships and 2 Walter Payton Awards I don't know who would?!?

You don't retire jerseys/numbers for good players... You retire them for GREAT players.. Once-in-a-lifetime players... AE was certainly that... and more.
One game does not a postseason make.
More App Games > Less App Games

User avatar
cbarrier90
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:30 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Contact:

Re: #14

Unread post by cbarrier90 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:24 pm

GoApps70 wrote:Not really in favor of "retiring" a number. Hard to really do when you are running a program. Retiring a jersey, OK. But do not want to retire the number. Some schools have lost potentially great players because they felt like they had to wear a certain number.
I think our program has done alright despite retiring Hand, Hackett, Settle and Coakley.

It adds to the tradition of the program. I was not around to watch any of those four at Appalachian, but because their numbers are on the walls of the KBS grandstands, I have an appreciation for what those four men did for the program.

Everyone around the program knows AE's number should be retired and I doubt it will be a big deal for a recruit if he doesn't get to wear 14. Heck, one floor of the athletic building which recruits are bound to see at some point is dedicated entirely to listing AE's accomplishments.

If I were Price, I'd actually be glad to get out of the shadow of that number and build my own App legacy under #10 or whatever number he is choosing.

User avatar
appst89
Site Admin
Posts: 10086
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 390 times
Been thanked: 2527 times

Re: #14

Unread post by appst89 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:50 pm

cbarrier90 wrote:
GoApps70 wrote:Not really in favor of "retiring" a number. Hard to really do when you are running a program. Retiring a jersey, OK. But do not want to retire the number. Some schools have lost potentially great players because they felt like they had to wear a certain number.
I think our program has done alright despite retiring Hand, Hackett, Settle and Coakley.

It adds to the tradition of the program. I was not around to watch any of those four at Appalachian, but because their numbers are on the walls of the KBS grandstands, I have an appreciation for what those four men did for the program.

Everyone around the program knows AE's number should be retired and I doubt it will be a big deal for a recruit if he doesn't get to wear 14. Heck, one floor of the athletic building which recruits are bound to see at some point is dedicated entirely to listing AE's accomplishments.

If I were Price, I'd actually be glad to get out of the shadow of that number and build my own App legacy under #10 or whatever number he is choosing.
I was privileged to see three of the four players whose numbers are retired at ASU. Each one of them was worthy of that honor. However, if ever a number deserved to be retired by a program, #14 is it at ASU. I'm not a big fan of retiring numbers, but sometimes a player comes along that requires an exception. Armanti Edwards was that player. I would have no problem at all with having a huge ceremony and retiring #14 with all the fanfare we can muster.

User avatar
ASUMountaineer
Posts: 7250
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:20 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: State of Appalachian
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: #14

Unread post by ASUMountaineer » Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:18 am

appst89 wrote:
cbarrier90 wrote:
GoApps70 wrote:Not really in favor of "retiring" a number. Hard to really do when you are running a program. Retiring a jersey, OK. But do not want to retire the number. Some schools have lost potentially great players because they felt like they had to wear a certain number.
I think our program has done alright despite retiring Hand, Hackett, Settle and Coakley.

It adds to the tradition of the program. I was not around to watch any of those four at Appalachian, but because their numbers are on the walls of the KBS grandstands, I have an appreciation for what those four men did for the program.

Everyone around the program knows AE's number should be retired and I doubt it will be a big deal for a recruit if he doesn't get to wear 14. Heck, one floor of the athletic building which recruits are bound to see at some point is dedicated entirely to listing AE's accomplishments.

If I were Price, I'd actually be glad to get out of the shadow of that number and build my own App legacy under #10 or whatever number he is choosing.
I was privileged to see three of the four players whose numbers are retired at ASU. Each one of them was worthy of that honor. However, if ever a number deserved to be retired by a program, #14 is it at ASU. I'm not a big fan of retiring numbers, but sometimes a player comes along that requires an exception. Armanti Edwards was that player. I would have no problem at all with having a huge ceremony and retiring #14 with all the fanfare we can muster.
I couldn't agree with your post more. Excellent post.

I tend to fall on the side of retiring jerseys, but #14 should be retired.
Poster formerly known as AppState03 (MMB) and currently known as ASUMountaineer everywhere else.

fjblair
Posts: 3377
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:03 pm
Has thanked: 1346 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: #14

Unread post by fjblair » Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:26 pm

appst89 wrote:
cbarrier90 wrote:
GoApps70 wrote:Not really in favor of "retiring" a number. Hard to really do when you are running a program. Retiring a jersey, OK. But do not want to retire the number. Some schools have lost potentially great players because they felt like they had to wear a certain number.
I think our program has done alright despite retiring Hand, Hackett, Settle and Coakley.

It adds to the tradition of the program. I was not around to watch any of those four at Appalachian, but because their numbers are on the walls of the KBS grandstands, I have an appreciation for what those four men did for the program.

Everyone around the program knows AE's number should be retired and I doubt it will be a big deal for a recruit if he doesn't get to wear 14. Heck, one floor of the athletic building which recruits are bound to see at some point is dedicated entirely to listing AE's accomplishments.

If I were Price, I'd actually be glad to get out of the shadow of that number and build my own App legacy under #10 or whatever number he is choosing.
I was privileged to see three of the four players whose numbers are retired at ASU. Each one of them was worthy of that honor. However, if ever a number deserved to be retired by a program, #14 is it at ASU. I'm not a big fan of retiring numbers, but sometimes a player comes along that requires an exception. Armanti Edwards was that player. I would have no problem at all with having a huge ceremony and retiring #14 with all the fanfare we can muster.
Right on 89!

If you are going to retire numbers, Armanti Edwards #14 is the pinnacle.

User avatar
Maddog1956
Posts: 1047
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:03 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: #14

Unread post by Maddog1956 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:00 pm

vegattk wrote:I'm on that also agrees that you shouldn't retire numbers...

BUT DOG-GONE-IT.. If #14 hasn't earned it with 2 National Championships and 2 Walter Payton Awards I don't know who would?!?

You don't retire jerseys/numbers for good players... You retire them for GREAT players.. Once-in-a-lifetime players... AE was certainly that... and more.
I agree! I think it's a <1 second decision. If we don't retire it, what would a player have to do to deserve it? Walk on walk?
Image

scatman77
Posts: 1299
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:38 am
Location: York, SC
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 992 times

Re: #14

Unread post by scatman77 » Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:46 am

To all: retiring jerseys/numbers is obviously a hot issue here and rightfully so. My solution would be that the previously retired numbers be kept as is. Then start at "Wall of Honor" at KBS somewhere on the facade of the building complex. Put the numbers there with the name of the honoree that wore it and then let the number "remain in play." For what it's worth I wouldn't want to be the one wearing the number but it could be one that is a team honor: let the team vote on whether a player is worthy of the number and make it a prestigious thing.

This is something that just came to mind and would need some fine-tuning but in some way it solves the issue of retiring a number and also honoring the player who previously wore it.
We don't slide at Appalachian State. It's a sign of weakness.

fjblair
Posts: 3377
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:03 pm
Has thanked: 1346 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: #14

Unread post by fjblair » Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:56 am

scatman77 wrote:To all: retiring jerseys/numbers is obviously a hot issue here and rightfully so. My solution would be that the previously retired numbers be kept as is. Then start at "Wall of Honor" at KBS somewhere on the facade of the building complex. Put the numbers there with the name of the honoree that wore it and then let the number "remain in play." For what it's worth I wouldn't want to be the one wearing the number but it could be one that is a team honor: let the team vote on whether a player is worthy of the number and make it a prestigious thing.

This is something that just came to mind and would need some fine-tuning but in some way it solves the issue of retiring a number and also honoring the player who previously wore it.

Good idea, but #14 has to be retired or put all the numbers back in play.

MountainMan
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:22 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: #14

Unread post by MountainMan » Sat Mar 16, 2013 4:27 pm

appst89 wrote: I was privileged to see three of the four players whose numbers are retired at ASU. Each one of them was worthy of that honor. However, if ever a number deserved to be retired by a program, #14 is it at ASU. I'm not a big fan of retiring numbers, but sometimes a player comes along that requires an exception. Armanti Edwards was that player. I would have no problem at all with having a huge ceremony and retiring #14 with all the fanfare we can muster.
+1 Well said.

If ASU does not retire Armanti's number, then no number should EVER be retired, and "logic" would seem to suggest to go back and un-retire previous numbers retired.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”