Interesting App UT prediction

appbio91
Posts: 2490
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:00 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 238 times
Been thanked: 468 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by appbio91 » Sun Jul 31, 2016 8:42 pm

I am considering full FBS era that started last year.


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk

User avatar
firemoose
Posts: 8281
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Has thanked: 929 times
Been thanked: 3947 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by firemoose » Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:45 pm

appbio91 wrote:I am considering full FBS era that started last year.
91. This isn't directed at you but the ones you were responding to:

Still not there yet. It will be two more years before we're truly a full FBS program. I said this in another thread but since the comparisons are still being used being full FBS is when all your recruiting classes are non transitional FBS classes and the 4th one has at least one year of experience, whether as So's or RS Fr. We are considered full FBS now overall but from a player/recruiting standpoint we've still got a little ways to go. I plan to withhold my judgement on our performance against P5's until then.

CVAPP
Posts: 1322
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:45 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Catawba Valley
Has thanked: 729 times
Been thanked: 314 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by CVAPP » Sun Jul 31, 2016 11:06 pm

firemoose wrote: Still not there yet. It will be two more years before we're truly a full FBS program. I said this in another thread but since the comparisons are still being used being full FBS is when all your recruiting classes are non transitional FBS classes and the 4th one has at least one year of experience, whether as So's or RS Fr. We are considered full FBS now overall but from a player/recruiting standpoint we've still got a little ways to go. I plan to withhold my judgement on our performance against P5's until then.
Then so will I. Thanks for the perspective! I have every reason to believe we will lack coaching continuity when we get to that point with the roster. The stink is suffering from from the the same roster situation and already has experienced plenty of coaching continuity dilemmas. We are indeed fortunate!

User avatar
firemoose
Posts: 8281
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Has thanked: 929 times
Been thanked: 3947 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by firemoose » Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:32 am

You are right CV. I didn't address that situation because it's an unknown but it will become an issue in time. I just wanted to make the point to everyone that just because a team is considered FBS after the two year transition doesn't make them a true FBS program. It take time to recruit and fill your roster with full FBS classes. There have been several threads recently discussing our lack of success against FBS teams and P5's in particular. Since the split they have been at a higher level than us so I look at those stats with that in mind. We'll see how we do once we reach the talent and depth of a full FBS program. As for the staff, from conversations I've had, I don't believe the entire staff will leave with Satt unless it's a perfect situation. Those don't come along often and hopefully, by keeping some of the current staff, that will ease the difficulties that are inherent with coaching changes. It's something that we can't control and it will happen. We've only had two HC's since 1989. That doesn't often happen at our level and we'll see if our program and tradition can keep things together once turnover happens. We've done pretty well since 1928 with very few losing seasons and very few HC's under .500. Hopefully, as turnover happens, we can find the right people moving forward to keep the program pointed in the right direction.

CVAPP
Posts: 1322
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:45 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Catawba Valley
Has thanked: 729 times
Been thanked: 314 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by CVAPP » Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:03 am

I am thinking Stu Holt if he is still around and available at the time.

User avatar
AtlAppMan
Posts: 2242
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: ATL
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 1489 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by AtlAppMan » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:10 am

One area of defense that we need to work on is when the opponent hurries up the tempo. We got into serious trouble last year when this happened against Clemson, Troy and StAte. All of them smelled blood in the water and pounced. In all three instances we had no answer. We did much better when we were the aggressor but when we got on the ground on our backs we weren't good at getting back on our feet. We have to solve that weakness as I would expect all good teams we play this year to take notice and have a very aggressive game plan against us.

I will bet serious money that Tennessee uses this approach so we better be prepared for the onslaught. If our D can absorb the onslaught then it can work in our favor for our offensive response. But we have to be able to get stops and get them off the field.
Last edited by AtlAppMan on Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:10 am

All this talk has me thinking about another side to this discussion. If we lined up against and beat the following P5's (quick and dirty list), would it be considered a "huge" upset?

Wake
Syracuse
Virginia
GA Tech
BC
Pitt
UNC
NCSU
Kansas
Iowa St
Indiana
Maryland
Rutgers
Illinois
Minnesota
Northwestern
Purdue
Washington State
Colorado
Vanderbilt
Kentucky

Also, what G5 win would fall under that category? Houston, Memphis or Boise?

AppinVA
Posts: 14326
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2000 9:41 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 3619 times
Been thanked: 3400 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by AppinVA » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:17 am

Beating the CHeaters would be a huge upset. Ga Tech depends on what year it is. They run hot and cold...at the same time, seemingly. For some of those teams, it might be a mild upset at best, and the others, I'd be disappointed if we lost.
"Some people call me hillbilly. Some people call me mountain man. You can call me Appalachian. Appalachian's what I am."-- Del McCoury Band

User avatar
/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09
Posts: 3137
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 2:05 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Virginia
Has thanked: 653 times
Been thanked: 1767 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by /\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:24 am

bigdaddyg wrote:All this talk has me thinking about another side to this discussion. If we lined up against and beat the following P5's (quick and dirty list), would it be considered a "huge" upset?

Wake
Syracuse
Virginia
GA Tech
BC
Pitt
UNC
NCSU
Kansas
Iowa St
Indiana
Maryland
Rutgers
Illinois
Minnesota
Northwestern
Purdue
Washington State
Colorado
Vanderbilt
Kentucky

Also, what G5 win would fall under that category? Houston, Memphis or Boise?
Depends on where they rank at the time we play.
Twitter: @brosef_yosef

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:26 am

AppinVA wrote:Beating the CHeaters would be a huge upset. Ga Tech depends on what year it is. They run hot and cold...at the same time, seemingly. For some of those teams, it might be a mild upset at best, and the others, I'd be disappointed if we lost.
That's kind of where I was going with it. With regards to our current program versus P5's and top G5's right now how would we shake it down? I use categories such as:

Expected win
Mild upset
Big upset
Monumental upset

Agree with a program such as GA Tech. They could be a 9-3 team or a 4-8. Not consistent. Also agree with Moose. We really need two more classes to get to the true FBS level. As long as we don't become a roller coaster type program I will be happy.

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:28 am

/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote:
bigdaddyg wrote:All this talk has me thinking about another side to this discussion. If we lined up against and beat the following P5's (quick and dirty list), would it be considered a "huge" upset?

Wake
Syracuse
Virginia
GA Tech
BC
Pitt
UNC
NCSU
Kansas
Iowa St
Indiana
Maryland
Rutgers
Illinois
Minnesota
Northwestern
Purdue
Washington State
Colorado
Vanderbilt
Kentucky

Also, what G5 win would fall under that category? Houston, Memphis or Boise?
Depends on where they rank at the time we play.
That obviously goes without saying. I tried to pick schools that don't typically set the world on fire on a yearly basis.

User avatar
/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09
Posts: 3137
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 2:05 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Virginia
Has thanked: 653 times
Been thanked: 1767 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by /\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 » Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:31 am

bigdaddyg wrote:
/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote:
bigdaddyg wrote:All this talk has me thinking about another side to this discussion. If we lined up against and beat the following P5's (quick and dirty list), would it be considered a "huge" upset?

Wake
Syracuse
Virginia
GA Tech
BC
Pitt
UNC
NCSU
Kansas
Iowa St
Indiana
Maryland
Rutgers
Illinois
Minnesota
Northwestern
Purdue
Washington State
Colorado
Vanderbilt
Kentucky

Also, what G5 win would fall under that category? Houston, Memphis or Boise?
Depends on where they rank at the time we play.
That obviously goes without saying. I tried to pick schools that don't typically set the world on fire on a yearly basis.
I would not consider any of the teams listed as huge upsets. I also think that the way G5 schools are beating teams like this annually takes away from the upset factor.
Twitter: @brosef_yosef

User avatar
APPdiesel
Posts: 2687
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 822 times
Been thanked: 1522 times
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by APPdiesel » Mon Aug 01, 2016 10:08 am

/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote:
bigdaddyg wrote:
/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote:
bigdaddyg wrote:All this talk has me thinking about another side to this discussion. If we lined up against and beat the following P5's (quick and dirty list), would it be considered a "huge" upset?

Wake
Syracuse
Virginia
GA Tech
BC
Pitt
UNC
NCSU
Kansas
Iowa St
Indiana
Maryland
Rutgers
Illinois
Minnesota
Northwestern
Purdue
Washington State
Colorado
Vanderbilt
Kentucky

Also, what G5 win would fall under that category? Houston, Memphis or Boise?
Depends on where they rank at the time we play.
That obviously goes without saying. I tried to pick schools that don't typically set the world on fire on a yearly basis.
I would not consider any of the teams listed as huge upsets. I also think that the way G5 schools are beating teams like this annually takes away from the upset factor.
However we'd still be happy to beat those teams. We've had a knack for playing top teams on their way back up to greatness (not always, but more often than not).

twitter.com/DieselOnRadio
Sports talk host & content creator on The Fan Upstate, 97.7 FM Greenville/97.1 FM Spartanburg/FREE AUDACY APP.

http://www.twitter.com/dieselonradio

User avatar
appst89
Site Admin
Posts: 10117
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 404 times
Been thanked: 2570 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by appst89 » Mon Aug 01, 2016 10:27 am

Out of all the teams on that list, I'd love to play Washington State. Mike Leach is one of my favorite coaches. Would be fun to see Wazzu in Boone.

EastHallApp
Posts: 6789
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Raleigh
Has thanked: 3374 times
Been thanked: 2947 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by EastHallApp » Mon Aug 01, 2016 10:42 am

bigdaddyg wrote:All this talk has me thinking about another side to this discussion. If we lined up against and beat the following P5's (quick and dirty list), would it be considered a "huge" upset?

Wake
Syracuse
Virginia
GA Tech
BC
Pitt
UNC
NCSU
Kansas
Iowa St
Indiana
Maryland
Rutgers
Illinois
Minnesota
Northwestern
Purdue
Washington State
Colorado
Vanderbilt
Kentucky

Also, what G5 win would fall under that category? Houston, Memphis or Boise?
No monumental upsets here. Based on where the programs stand today, I'd sort them like this:

Solid favorite
Wake Forest
Kansas
Purdue


Slight favorite
BC
Iowa State
Maryland
Rutgers
Colorado
Vanderbilt
Memphis (I expect them to fall off significantly this year with Fuente and Lynch gone)

Toss-up
Syracuse
Virginia
NC State
Indiana
Illinois
Minnesota
Kentucky

Mild upset
Georgia Tech
Pitt
Northwestern
Washington State
Boise State

Big upset
UNC (I know people won't like this, but the truth is they are much better right now than all but about three of the P5s listed here)
Houston

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:14 pm

EastHallApp wrote:
bigdaddyg wrote:All this talk has me thinking about another side to this discussion. If we lined up against and beat the following P5's (quick and dirty list), would it be considered a "huge" upset?

Wake
Syracuse
Virginia
GA Tech
BC
Pitt
UNC
NCSU
Kansas
Iowa St
Indiana
Maryland
Rutgers
Illinois
Minnesota
Northwestern
Purdue
Washington State
Colorado
Vanderbilt
Kentucky

Also, what G5 win would fall under that category? Houston, Memphis or Boise?
No monumental upsets here. Based on where the programs stand today, I'd sort them like this:

Solid favorite
Wake Forest
Kansas
Purdue


Slight favorite
BC
Iowa State
Maryland
Rutgers
Colorado
Vanderbilt
Memphis (I expect them to fall off significantly this year with Fuente and Lynch gone)

Toss-up
Syracuse
Virginia
NC State
Indiana
Illinois
Minnesota
Kentucky

Mild upset
Georgia Tech
Pitt
Northwestern
Washington State
Boise State

Big upset
UNC (I know people won't like this, but the truth is they are much better right now than all but about three of the P5s listed here)
Houston
That's a pretty good take. Puts a lot of P5's in perspective. Now go back to our best FCS team and do the same thing. Probably going to be way different. Shows why we shouldn't be consumed with past performance

appfan22
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2016 2:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 51 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by appfan22 » Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:33 am

The play call that really got our offense going against Clemson (until the end zone interception) was the HB screen to Upshaw. I am not saying be overly deceptive, but the play calling needs to be creative if we hope to move the ball against a talented SEC defense.

Goapps15
Posts: 1269
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:52 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 612 times
Been thanked: 298 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by Goapps15 » Tue Aug 02, 2016 9:25 am

I consider it a successful day if the game is not over by halftime. We have not done that in these games very often recently.

We have alot of talent and good coaches but we have to be willing to throw the kitchen sink at teams like Miami or Tennessee in order to compete. Playing with the mentality of nothing to lose would help greatly.

MDaniels84
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:47 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 414 times
Been thanked: 464 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by MDaniels84 » Tue Aug 02, 2016 10:35 am

Goapps15 wrote:I consider it a successful day if the game is not over by halftime. We have not done that in these games very often recently.

We have alot of talent and good coaches but we have to be willing to throw the kitchen sink at teams like Miami or Tennessee in order to compete. Playing with the mentality of nothing to lose would help greatly.
I agree with this to an extent. Our defense is actually athletic enough to keep up (speed and strength) with programs like Tenn, Miami, and others. I wholeheartedly wish that Coach Woody turns his horses loose a little and dials up some aggressive packages when needed in order to keep these bigger programs on their heels. Can't wait for this season to begin !

User avatar
MountaineerChemist10
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:01 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro, NC
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 51 times

Re: Interesting App UT prediction

Unread post by MountaineerChemist10 » Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:52 pm

We were predicted to lose vs. Michigan, didn't happen. Predicted to lose vs. Ohio at the Camellia Bowl game, didn't happen. 2015 Panthers predicted to go 8-8, didn't happen. I don't ever pay attention to journalist's predictions.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”