Lamb performance so far

Budman2154 · Unread post by **Budman2154** » Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:03 am

TL has struggled against each of the P5 schools played. He looked lost last year at Clemson each time he was flushed out of the pocket and the result was an interception that could otherwise been at the minimum a FG attempt. Would like to see the ball thrown away in those cases. I agree the receivers have dropped some balls, but they are who we have and TL needs to keep making the throws and give them the opportunity. I think it is reasonable for us all to expect improvement year after year from our QB and team leader. Hopefully, we will see that this week against Akron. He will be needed.

WVAPPeer · Unread post by **WVAPPeer** » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:07 pm

bigdaddyg wrote:Agree with the play calling comments. Jet sweeps with our fast guys, quick hitters to receivers so that they can make plays in space, TL keep the ball some and run. Is it a case of guys on the field not able to process plays quickly. If we are going to get to the line and burn 20 seconds looking to the sideline and then moving around just huddle up and bring the plays in. We used to be able to move fast and take it down the field in older times with what were deemed to be lesser athletes

Our "no-huddle" is not about going fast - it is about having the defense show their alignment so the coaches upstairs might be able to spot "something" - We have had no need to rush plays in or be in a hurry in our first 3 games ---

BUTCH1991 · Unread post by **BUTCH1991** » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:56 pm

WVAPPeer wrote:
bigdaddyg wrote:Agree with the play calling comments. Jet sweeps with our fast guys, quick hitters to receivers so that they can make plays in space, TL keep the ball some and run. Is it a case of guys on the field not able to process plays quickly. If we are going to get to the line and burn 20 seconds looking to the sideline and then moving around just huddle up and bring the plays in. We used to be able to move fast and take it down the field in older times with what were deemed to be lesser athletes
Our "no-huddle" is not about going fast - it is about having the defense show their alignment so the coaches upstairs might be able to spot "something" - We have had no need to rush plays in or be in a hurry in our first 3 games ---

Agreed, but I sure wish we would utilize it from time to time.

bigdaddyg · Unread post by **bigdaddyg** » Thu Sep 22, 2016 1:06 pm

BUTCH1991 wrote:
WVAPPeer wrote:
bigdaddyg wrote:Agree with the play calling comments. Jet sweeps with our fast guys, quick hitters to receivers so that they can make plays in space, TL keep the ball some and run. Is it a case of guys on the field not able to process plays quickly. If we are going to get to the line and burn 20 seconds looking to the sideline and then moving around just huddle up and bring the plays in. We used to be able to move fast and take it down the field in older times with what were deemed to be lesser athletes
Our "no-huddle" is not about going fast - it is about having the defense show their alignment so the coaches upstairs might be able to spot "something" - We have had no need to rush plays in or be in a hurry in our first 3 games ---
Agreed, but I sure wish we would utilize it from time to time.

Agree with both. We just seem to get on the line, do all that "see what the defense" is going to do, then do simple run plays. If we could speed up the tempo it might allow for some passing success.

EastHallApp · Unread post by **EastHallApp** » Thu Sep 22, 2016 1:38 pm

WVAPPeer wrote:
bigdaddyg wrote:Agree with the play calling comments. Jet sweeps with our fast guys, quick hitters to receivers so that they can make plays in space, TL keep the ball some and run. Is it a case of guys on the field not able to process plays quickly. If we are going to get to the line and burn 20 seconds looking to the sideline and then moving around just huddle up and bring the plays in. We used to be able to move fast and take it down the field in older times with what were deemed to be lesser athletes
Our "no-huddle" is not about going fast - it is about having the defense show their alignment so the coaches upstairs might be able to spot "something" - We have had no need to rush plays in or be in a hurry in our first 3 games ---

Well, other than the last drive in Knoxville.

WVAPPeer · Unread post by **WVAPPeer** » Thu Sep 22, 2016 2:54 pm

EastHallApp wrote:
WVAPPeer wrote:
bigdaddyg wrote:Agree with the play calling comments. Jet sweeps with our fast guys, quick hitters to receivers so that they can make plays in space, TL keep the ball some and run. Is it a case of guys on the field not able to process plays quickly. If we are going to get to the line and burn 20 seconds looking to the sideline and then moving around just huddle up and bring the plays in. We used to be able to move fast and take it down the field in older times with what were deemed to be lesser athletes
Our "no-huddle" is not about going fast - it is about having the defense show their alignment so the coaches upstairs might be able to spot "something" - We have had no need to rush plays in or be in a hurry in our first 3 games ---
Well, other than the last drive in Knoxville.

True ---

Seattleapp · Unread post by **Seattleapp** » Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:46 pm

This thread has restored my hope in message boards. Thank you to everyone for posting logical responses.

diehardapp18 · Unread post by **diehardapp18** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:55 pm

Put Caruso in imo

boonetown1 · Unread post by **boonetown1** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 5:07 pm

The coaches are doing a lot more to help out lamb this week (quick outs to open up down field, then down field opens up run). Best offensive game we've played so far.

Seattleapp · Unread post by **Seattleapp** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 5:41 pm

I agree

TheMackAttack · Unread post by **TheMackAttack** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:12 pm

diehardapp18 wrote:Put Caruso in imo

If you expect to do better than 22/30 for 280 yards with 3 TDs and a rushing TD then you'll never be satisfied with our QB play.

Yosef10 · Unread post by **Yosef10** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:18 pm

diehardapp18 wrote:Put Caruso in imo

I mean I like Caruso but he didn't even convincingly win the back up job this fall. Taylor is just fine and will be behind center until he graduates.

appbio91 · Unread post by **appbio91** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:19 pm

I think the main distress is there is almost no quick strike potential. Meadors is neutralized by our inability to use him. But hey as long as our grind it out works and Lamb takes care of the ball it's all good. His numbers are certainly eye catching if the performance is not flashy.

ah59396 · Unread post by **ah59396** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:20 pm

I was very critical of Lamb last week post Miami, but he did a very nice job today. Wonderful bounce back game for him. I still think QB is an area of focus for us going into next season, but glad to see Taylor have a nice performance.

T-Dog · Unread post by **T-Dog** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:21 pm

appbio91 wrote:I think the main distress is there is almost no quick strike potential.

We had a 93-yard drive in 80 seconds today right before half.

TheMackAttack · Unread post by **TheMackAttack** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:34 pm

Yosef10 wrote:
diehardapp18 wrote:Put Caruso in imo
I mean I like Caruso but he didn't even convincingly win the back up job this fall. Taylor is just fine and will be behind center until he graduates.

That's another very important point that people seem to be missing. Caruso is a great teammate and a hard worker, but before Daniel David transferred, it was likely that Caruso never started a game for App State. Now there's a solid chance he starts as a fifth year senior, but he didn't exactly put the other guys away this fall in the competition for QB2.

diehardapp18 · Unread post by **diehardapp18** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:41 pm

You guys clearly can't pick up on sarcasm haha, he was fantastic today

appbio91 · Unread post by **appbio91** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 7:48 pm

T-Dog wrote:
appbio91 wrote:I think the main distress is there is almost no quick strike potential.
We had a 93-yard drive in 80 seconds today right before half.

And that was nice. My point is passes longer than 10 or 15 yards are very rare. Lots of long passes on paper because of yards after catch though. Not criticizing Lamb, I like him and I think he does a great job. He is a smart guy and runs our very well.

diehardapp18 · Unread post by **diehardapp18** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 7:55 pm

appbio91 wrote:
T-Dog wrote:
appbio91 wrote:I think the main distress is there is almost no quick strike potential.
We had a 93-yard drive in 80 seconds today right before half.
And that was nice. My point is passes longer than 10 or 15 yards are very rare. Lots of long passes on paper because of yards after catch though. Not criticizing Lamb, I like him and I think he does a great job. He is a smart guy and runs our very well.

Why take shots down the field when your running game is gashing the opposition like they were today. That's when Lamb is best, when his task is just managing the game. Today we used the run to set up the pass and Lamb made some very nice plays. Today was Satterfield offense at its best imo

AppAttack · Unread post by **AppAttack** » Sat Sep 24, 2016 8:05 pm

Solid today and no interceptions. Of course we weren't playing Tennessee or Miami. I knew he'd be fine against G5 just like last season. Moore looks to be back on track. He is a horse and just needs reps to get warmed up. And how about Rubino? 6-6 PAT and 1 FG. Only area of concern is the defensive backfield, however they came up with two huge int's that effectively won the game.

Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Re: Lamb performance so far

Login • Register