Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

bigCasu
Posts: 5535
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 3:32 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 786 times
Contact:

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by bigCasu » Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:22 pm

EastHallApp wrote:
bigCasu wrote:
/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote:We have a lot of good plans...But who is going to pay for it? Where will the money come from?
That money comes from people buying season tickets and investing into the program. When entities borrow money, the lender wants to know that the loan can be paid back. We prove that with season tickets sales.
I've never run an athletic dept., and obviously the more tickets and YC memberships sold the better, but I suspect we need to attract some major corporate sponsors besides just relying on rank-and-file donors and fans. (Unless we can locate that one super-wealthy sugar-daddy booster like some places have.)

In the meantime, I think that's why it's important to find those cost-effective improvements. Bowling in the North end zone would obviously be expensive, never mind the fact that the demand doesn't currently exist for that many extra seats when the opponent isn't named Miami. Adding patio/cafe table seating around the top of the hill, OTOH, shouldn't be too pricey and would provide more premium seats that I bet would get snatched up quickly.
Doug Gillin has said repeatedly, we can't build more permanent stands until we fill up what we have. Miami helps, but that's the first domino. Wake Forest will help too, but we cant depend on home P5 games to build stands, and I don't want us building stands for one game a year.

EastHallApp
Posts: 6789
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Raleigh
Has thanked: 3374 times
Been thanked: 2947 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by EastHallApp » Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:41 pm

bigCasu wrote:
Doug Gillin has said repeatedly, we can't build more permanent stands until we fill up what we have. Miami helps, but that's the first domino. Wake Forest will help too, but we cant depend on home P5 games to build stands, and I don't want us building stands for one game a year.
He must not have taken the same business and econ classes as some of our fans. Or perhaps he was out the day they explained how, when demand isn't meeting supply, you just produce more supply in order to increase demand! :lol:

User avatar
asu66
Posts: 26935
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 1:21 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 2044 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by asu66 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:46 pm

Takeaways...North end zone, weight training facility, premium seating and video board, plus KBS dress-ups. Also new track & field facility and new soccer facility. Several optional sites under consideration. Remember the millennial campus concept...this is the new kid on the block.
Proud triple-degree App grad--Classes of '66, '70 and '81.
If it happens to the Apps, it happens to me!

User avatar
MtnDevil95
Posts: 517
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:50 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Out there somewhere
Has thanked: 186 times
Been thanked: 190 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by MtnDevil95 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 2:00 pm

When I say tents, I mean something similar to what you would see at a PGA event. Think hospitality tent, I'm not talking about some tailgate pop-up, but something semi-permanent. Perhaps with alternating black and gold canopies, flags from the peaks, sides, and even heating/cooling, the whole nine yards.
“When you take that field today, you've got to lay that heart on the line, men. From the souls of your feet, with every ounce of blood you've got in your body, lay it on the line until the final whistle blows.”

User avatar
APPdiesel
Posts: 2687
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 822 times
Been thanked: 1522 times
Contact:

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by APPdiesel » Fri Aug 05, 2016 3:37 pm

Yosef10 wrote:
APPdiesel wrote:Want to affect change? Email Doug Gillan with your concerns. Do so in a rational, thoughtful, clear, and concise way (especially with things like moving the extra equipment on game day). He replied to many many emails about the white out, so he does read them.

Hate being that guy and not singling you out as many still do it. But I think we should at least at this point get our AD's name correct, it's Doug Gillin.
My bad. I combined Doug Gillin with 'Breaking Bad' producer and visionary Vince Gilligan.
Sports talk host & content creator on The Fan Upstate, 97.7 FM Greenville/97.1 FM Spartanburg/FREE AUDACY APP.

http://www.twitter.com/dieselonradio

tigersef
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by tigersef » Sun Aug 07, 2016 10:51 pm

asu66 wrote:Takeaways...North end zone, weight training facility, premium seating and video board, plus KBS dress-ups. Also new track & field facility and new soccer facility. Several optional sites under consideration. Remember the millennial campus concept...this is the new kid on the block.
This is the kind of facility that should be placed in the north end zone. However, it should be done right. By this I mean it should be designed to have stands facing the field side and the concourse should be extended around from the east side to the west side as what would essentially be the roof of the facility. The premium seating should be added above the concourse level. The side of the structure facing stadium lot should include the same facade materials used for the athletics center which would provide a uniform stadium look and wonderful entry feature. This would all assume the track is removed, the field is lowered and Miller Hill is regraded and moved closer to the south side of the field. If the debt capacity isn't available now to do it right, what's the rush? It should be done right, not piecemeal. I can only hope our athletics administration shares this point of view.

User avatar
JTApps1
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:18 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Belmont
Has thanked: 641 times
Been thanked: 1204 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by JTApps1 » Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:44 am

I took the image the school created, removed the dorm, the current boxes on the east side, connected the end zone seats, and moved the hill closer to the action. I left the sideline in place due to the cost of lowering the field, but I think this would look very good!
Attachments
KiddBrewEdit2.jpg

boonetown1
Posts: 864
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:10 am
School: Appalachian State
Been thanked: 220 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by boonetown1 » Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:04 pm

I do like the rendering above. I think it would be cool if the connecting sides were raised to allow vehicles/players from home/away to come in under the fans.

I do think it would be cool to build a platform/walkway thats raised under the home side down to the tunnel mentioned above (kind of like a Clemson entrance). The could show the players walking on the video board and building anticipation until they come out. People would be yelling as they come in seeing the team walk above them. IMO, it would not be a significant cost. But the logistics may pose an issue.

User avatar
/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09
Posts: 3137
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 2:05 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Virginia
Has thanked: 653 times
Been thanked: 1767 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by /\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 » Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:07 pm

JTApps1 wrote:I took the image the school created, removed the dorm, the current boxes on the east side, connected the end zone seats, and moved the hill closer to the action. I left the sideline in place due to the cost of lowering the field, but I think this would look very good!
Crowd that size would look very very very good. Time to make 421 and 321 eight lanes.
Twitter: @brosef_yosef

boonetown1
Posts: 864
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:10 am
School: Appalachian State
Been thanked: 220 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by boonetown1 » Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:23 pm

Also, obviously add in more suites in the middle as that is what we have high demand for. I think i heard DG mention that he liked ODUs expansion; i wouldnt be surprised to have end zone seating with a lot of suites above and student general sections below.

User avatar
AtlAppMan
Posts: 2242
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: ATL
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 1489 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by AtlAppMan » Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:34 pm

As a temp solution why not add 4-6 rows of temp bleachers along both sidelines on track backed up against current wall in front of first row of student section. Students would be happy to fill these seats.

Yosef10
Posts: 1835
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:15 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 335 times
Been thanked: 758 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by Yosef10 » Mon Aug 08, 2016 12:36 pm

/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote:
JTApps1 wrote:I took the image the school created, removed the dorm, the current boxes on the east side, connected the end zone seats, and moved the hill closer to the action. I left the sideline in place due to the cost of lowering the field, but I think this would look very good!
Crowd that size would look very very very good. Time to make 421 and 321 eight lanes.

Speaking of, has the 4 lane in Blowing Rock been fully completed yet?

User avatar
appgrouch
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:36 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: In my seat, waiting for people to shut up and play.
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 119 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by appgrouch » Mon Aug 08, 2016 1:57 pm

AtlAppMan wrote:As a temp solution why not add 4-6 rows of temp bleachers along both sidelines on track backed up against current wall in front of first row of student section. Students would be happy to fill these seats.
There is only about 11' of room between the wall and the back of the bench area.

Plus need to plan space for a barrier between fans and teams and get a few more red shirts.
That's what I do. I gripe and I know things.

Saint3333
Posts: 14482
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 8:42 am
Has thanked: 4056 times
Been thanked: 6264 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by Saint3333 » Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:19 pm

The cost of narrower the distance between the stands on the side to the field is way too much for the small benefit IMO.

User avatar
appgrouch
Posts: 1115
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:36 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: In my seat, waiting for people to shut up and play.
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 119 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by appgrouch » Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:53 pm

How about this for addition, over the restrooms on the hill build a deck that extends over them and the walkway that could be the YC party deck and create a score/video/stat board that would span the width of the deck.
That's what I do. I gripe and I know things.

bcoach
Posts: 4813
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1539 times
Been thanked: 1737 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by bcoach » Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:18 pm

I just hope we can fill what we have this year.

User avatar
/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09
Posts: 3137
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 2:05 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Virginia
Has thanked: 653 times
Been thanked: 1767 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by /\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 » Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:26 pm

bcoach wrote:I just hope we can fill what we have this year.
We will probably until conference play.
Twitter: @brosef_yosef

AppAlum1
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 6:18 am
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 283 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by AppAlum1 » Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:33 pm

EastHallApp wrote:He must not have taken the same business and econ classes as some of our fans. Or perhaps he was out the day they explained how, when demand isn't meeting supply, you just produce more supply in order to increase demand! :lol:
East Hall:
I know you were being sarcastic here, but your post reminded me of an event that occurred in Econ. class back in 1984-ish in the College of Business. Anyone recall Prof. Larry McRae, Economics? This class was both grad students and undergrads; grad students sat in back of the room & undergrads sat in front. I was working on my MBA at the time. The grad students were getting really tired of undergrad students who had not read the assignment wasting their time with stupid questions. It seemed to us grad students that professors were entirely too lenient and patient with such behavior.

We were studying the classic supply & demand curve graph. The prior night's assignment had explained how a change in price would not change demand (the curve), but it would change the quantity demanded (movement along the curve). (What happened next made me remember this to this day.) The already ornery Prof. McRae (with his long grey beard & very sharp tongue), had just stated that a price change would not change demand. Then, some poor undergrad, who was sitting on the front row exclaimed, "Well, it seems to me that a change of price WOULD change demand." It was obvious that said student had not bothered to familiarize himself with the assignment.

Oh, my goodness, the good Prof. McRae proceeded to berate this student as a complete dolt, called his mother all sorts of bad names, threw in a few good curse words (some of which I was unfamiliar with) and generally criticized the undergrad's lineage and intelligence. We never saw him again.

BTW, while this "lesson" was continuing (and it took a while), the grad students in the back of the room were giving each other high fives, and making notes that this was one class it was necessary to always be prepared.

User avatar
AtlAppMan
Posts: 2242
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: ATL
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 1489 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by AtlAppMan » Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:46 pm

bcoach wrote:I just hope we can fill what we have this year.
Let's take a look back in time just to see what our chances are of "filling what we have".

Year Avg Games
2015 21,459 6
2014 23,166 6
2013 24,894 6
2012 26,358 7 *
2011 26,211 7 *
2010 25,715 8 *
2009 24,004 7
2008 25,161 8 *
2007 24,218 9 *
2006 20,546 9

* - Led all FCS attendance per game
It is also fair to acknowledge that during the transition to FBS there was quite a bit of unfamiliarity with our new SBC opponents which contributed to a small drop off in attendance. Last year we also experienced an unusually bad weather season. I expect that based on our historical performance coupled with a good schedule we should expect many butts in the seats this year.

EastHallApp
Posts: 6789
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Raleigh
Has thanked: 3374 times
Been thanked: 2947 times

Re: Revisiting Track Removal/Renovation

Unread post by EastHallApp » Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:52 pm

AtlAppMan wrote:
bcoach wrote:I just hope we can fill what we have this year.
Let's take a look back in time just to see what our chances are of "filling what we have".

Year Avg Games
2015 21,459 6
2014 23,166 6
2013 24,894 6
2012 26,358 7 *
2011 26,211 7 *
2010 25,715 8 *
2009 24,004 7
2008 25,161 8 *
2007 24,218 9 *
2006 20,546 9

* - Led all FCS attendance per game
It is also fair to acknowledge that during the transition to FBS there was quite a bit of unfamiliarity with our new SBC opponents which contributed to a small drop off in attendance. Last year we also experienced an unusually bad weather season. I expect that based on our historical performance coupled with a good schedule we should expect many butts in the seats this year.

Lots o' seats available for the non-Miami portion of the schedule. If we upset them or UT I expect we'll see a surge in sales. Otherwise we're probably looking at another year with lots of empty seats.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”