Yes it was lazy. I recall people (not me) saying that very thing on this board in Sat's first year+ struggles.NewApp wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2024 2:04 pmAs for a "lazy hire", anytime you just elevate an assistant coach to fill a head coach vacancy, it is a lazy hire.AppfaninCAALand wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2024 11:18 amI thought at the time, and probably said on here, that Clark would be one of those coaches that would not be good enough to be hired away to a "bigger" school, but also not bad enough to fire. So far, that has been true. Time will tell on this season.appgrad95&97 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 06, 2024 8:49 am
1. I said in 2019 that Clark was a lazy hire, buy I wished him well and hoped he would grow into the job.
3. While I really hoped Clark would grow into the job, it doesn't seem like he has or will. That makes me question his extention.
As for a "lazy hire", anytime you just elevate an assistant coach to fill a head coach vacancy, it is a lazy hire. That doesn't mean its a bad move, sometimes it works out great. Elevating assistant field hockey coach Emily Dinsmore was a lazy hire by Gillan as well, but were it not for blowning late 4th quarter leads vs Richmond and VCU a few weeks back, she could quite likely have App State field hockey nationally ranked, and that would have been an unthinkable occurance only a few short years ago for sure.
Anyway, I hope Clark can turn it around and become a lazy hire that worked out, but my hope is fading.
So Satterfield was a lazy hire?
I also said it wasn't necessarily a bad thing, sometimes its the right move and works out great. Satterfield was one of those times it turned out great.
My point was to dismiss the lazy hire talk. There are plenty of other things to be concerned about.