Best App team w/o Satt
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 8:52 pm
Satt was a player from 1991-1995, Asst. Coach 1998-2008, 2012, HC 2013-today.
What was the best App team without him?
What was the best App team without him?
http://www.yosefscabin.com/forum/
If '09 was the season when Brian Quick dropped the ball at the goal line against Montana, I agree.EastHallApp wrote:I'm not enough of a historian to really give an informed answer, but '09 was pretty dang good.
I agree also; the loss to UCLA notwithstanding. To beat ECU, and ACC team and a former ACC team is quite credible.JTApps1 wrote:The 1975 team that beat SC, Wake, and ECU.
II was there and you are correct, that team could score from any point with one play - run or pass.scatman77 wrote:I agree also; the loss to UCLA notwithstanding. To beat ECU, and ACC team and a former ACC team is quite credible.JTApps1 wrote:The 1975 team that beat SC, Wake, and ECU.
Lost in this discussion is the team that none of us ever saw play and that was 1968. Finished 8-2 in the old NAIA Carolinas Conference. Yes, I know....NAIA but still a great team. Ron Kanoy (former AT who's seen App football since 1965) told me it was probably the only team he'd ever seen that could score with one play from any spot on the field. Of course the teams with Armanti might argue that point today.
EastHallApp wrote:I'm not enough of a historian to really give an informed answer, but '09 was pretty dang good.
That was my first as a student. I didn't want to watch the highlights from that game until the following season.MDaniels84 wrote:If '09 was the season when Brian Quick dropped the ball at the goal line against Montana, I agree.EastHallApp wrote:I'm not enough of a historian to really give an informed answer, but '09 was pretty dang good.
To be fair, WCU was actually a solid program back in those days plus we were just a few years removed from NAIA at that point. The 09 was VERY good, but all things considered the accomplishments of 1975 were better to me.Saint3333 wrote:I'm not sure I'm comfortable giving that title to a team that lost to WCU.
I tend to think of '09 as better than '08, but when I look back at their results, I guess that's because '09 was better in the playoffs. '08 was probably a little more dominant in the regular season, but didn't play their best at all in the playoffs.JTApps1 wrote:To be fair, WCU was actually a solid program back in those days plus we were just a few years removed from NAIA at that point. The 09 was VERY good, but all things considered the accomplishments of 1975 were better to me.Saint3333 wrote:I'm not sure I'm comfortable giving that title to a team that lost to WCU.
The 09 team only beat a 2 win WCU squad by 5 BTW...
Look up running backs Kevin Long and Clarence Williams, QB Jeff Grantz, LB Steve Prezioso. You'll see that they had a very solid team.AtlAppMan wrote:How good was USC in '75?
7-5, had what appear to be some decent wins: http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/sch ... edule.htmlAtlAppMan wrote:How good was USC in '75?
With Armanti dressed but not playing and our running back, Travaris Cadet starting the game at QB.JTApps1 wrote:To be fair, WCU was actually a solid program back in those days plus we were just a few years removed from NAIA at that point. The 09 was VERY good, but all things considered the accomplishments of 1975 were better to me.Saint3333 wrote:I'm not sure I'm comfortable giving that title to a team that lost to WCU.
The 09 team only beat a 2 win WCU squad by 5 BTW...