Here is the link to the fall sports streaming schedule.

https://appstatesports.com/news/2023/8/ ... edule.aspx

NMSU

Saint3333
Posts: 13041
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 8:42 am
Has thanked: 3029 times
Been thanked: 4682 times

NMSU

Unread post by Saint3333 » Sat Sep 30, 2017 3:40 pm

Watched the second half versus Arkansas, they have a great WR in Scott, going to be tough stopping him. Their defense wasn't very good on third downs so we should be able to move the ball.

sixtoes9134
Posts: 1245
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:42 am
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 278 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by sixtoes9134 » Sat Sep 30, 2017 4:29 pm

There are some tough conf games on our schedule that weren't tough in previous years but that's football.

User avatar
WVAPPeer
Posts: 12266
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:14 am
School: Other
Location: Born: Almost Heaven
Has thanked: 4615 times
Been thanked: 2520 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by WVAPPeer » Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:42 pm

QB put up some good numbers ---
"Montani Semper Liberi"

The Dude Abides!!!

Longrifle28
Posts: 1354
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:59 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1422 times
Been thanked: 583 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by Longrifle28 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 7:54 am

WVAPPeer wrote:
Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:42 pm
QB put up some good numbers ---
He has in every game so far. Our defensive backfield will get challenged this week, hopefully our gameplan defensively has a way to get pressure and disguise coverage. It will be interesting to see how we stack up statistically to Arizona State and Arkansas defenses versus the NMSU offense.

This game could be a track meet. Offense needs to score points.
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"

User avatar
biggie
Site Admin
Posts: 7511
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Clemmons
Has thanked: 1371 times
Been thanked: 1737 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by biggie » Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:29 am

Anyone noticed if their OL is beatable? I'd hope we can cover long enough to get pressure.

Rick83
Posts: 2683
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:00 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1955 times
Been thanked: 1553 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by Rick83 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:07 am

I think our defense will be able to handle these guys. Saw this on the Appstatesports site:

THREE STRIKES AND YOU'RE OUT

By forcing three-and-outs on 51.1 percent of its possessions, the Mountaineers rank third at the FBS level. They have forced 24 three-and-outs on 47 defensive possessions.

NewApp
Posts: 7499
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 960 times
Been thanked: 901 times
Contact:

Re: NMSU

Unread post by NewApp » Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:15 am

Rick83 wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:07 am
I think our defense will be able to handle these guys. Saw this on the Appstatesports site:

THREE STRIKES AND YOU'RE OUT

By forcing three-and-outs on 51.1 percent of its possessions, the Mountaineers rank third at the FBS level. They have forced 24 three-and-outs on 47 defensive possessions.

That includes Savannah State, however.
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX

Rick83
Posts: 2683
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:00 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1955 times
Been thanked: 1553 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by Rick83 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:23 am

NewApp wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:15 am
Rick83 wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:07 am
I think our defense will be able to handle these guys. Saw this on the Appstatesports site:

THREE STRIKES AND YOU'RE OUT

By forcing three-and-outs on 51.1 percent of its possessions, the Mountaineers rank third at the FBS level. They have forced 24 three-and-outs on 47 defensive possessions.

That includes Savannah State, however.
True; however, almost all FBS teams schedule an easier FCS opponent. Here's the breakdown, the worst performance was against Texas State:

"App State forced three-and-outs on 8 of 13 possessions against Wake Forest, 2 of 10 at Texas State, 9 of 12 against Savannah State and 5 of 12 at Georgia. After the opening drive against Wake Forest, the Mountaineers forced five straight three-and-outs on their way to claiming a 9-3 halftime lead."

Yosef84
Posts: 3741
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:27 am
Has thanked: 1264 times
Been thanked: 2094 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by Yosef84 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:35 am

Does NMSU have a dual threat QB? That seems to be our Achilles. Always hard to account for that variable.

Longrifle28
Posts: 1354
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:59 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1422 times
Been thanked: 583 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by Longrifle28 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:44 am

Yosef84 wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:35 am
Does NMSU have a dual threat QB? That seems to be our Achilles. Always hard to account for that variable.
It doesn't appear so. Their QB has 23 carries for 3 yards...

But they do have the conference best running back in Larry Rose III (who has been pretty bottled up this year), and the QB throws for over 350 yards per game (including games against Arizona State, New Mexico, Troy and Arkansas). Their patsy game was UTEP. All the rest have been close whether wins or losses. It must be pointed out that they have scored a lot of points in the fourth quarter to make some of these games close.
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"

Longrifle28
Posts: 1354
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:59 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1422 times
Been thanked: 583 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by Longrifle28 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:48 am

Interesting that the spread is somewhere around 10 or 11. Sagarin has us as a 12 point favorite, and Massey has us as a 13.5 point favorite. Massey says we have an 81% chance for a win with the score being something like 34 to 21. However, they put up more points on Arizona State, Troy and Arkansas than they are predicted to put up on us. They are averaging 30 points per game.

PS-this is not the prediction thread. Always wait for Big C before posting predictions.
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"

EastHallApp
Posts: 6643
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Raleigh
Has thanked: 3214 times
Been thanked: 2805 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by EastHallApp » Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:52 am

Dual threats are tough for any defense to defend, but we've done OK against some of them. Dobbs/UT, Washington/ODU, and we did pretty well against Wolford if you want to count him as a DT.

The ones that really seem to hurt us are the ones that can stretch the field with the deep ball. And if you have a QB who can do both... well, again, that's tough for any defense.

sixtoes9134
Posts: 1245
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:42 am
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 278 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by sixtoes9134 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:59 am

Our ongoing achilles is without a doubt the hurry up offense. We are NEVER ready for it.

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:07 am

EastHallApp wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:52 am
Dual threats are tough for any defense to defend, but we've done OK against some of them. Dobbs/UT, Washington/ODU, and we did pretty well against Wolford if you want to count him as a DT.

The ones that really seem to hurt us are the ones that can stretch the field with the deep ball. And if you have a QB who can do both... well, again, that's tough for any defense.
How many decent teams close to our level have a QB who is all of the threats? Probably not very many. Really don't want us to blow everyone out as that would mean the SB really sucks. A few close wins are fine because that means good games

EastHallApp
Posts: 6643
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Raleigh
Has thanked: 3214 times
Been thanked: 2805 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by EastHallApp » Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:21 am

bigdaddyg wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:07 am
EastHallApp wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:52 am
Dual threats are tough for any defense to defend, but we've done OK against some of them. Dobbs/UT, Washington/ODU, and we did pretty well against Wolford if you want to count him as a DT.

The ones that really seem to hurt us are the ones that can stretch the field with the deep ball. And if you have a QB who can do both... well, again, that's tough for any defense.
How many decent teams close to our level have a QB who is all of the threats? Probably not very many. Really don't want us to blow everyone out as that would mean the SB really sucks. A few close wins are fine because that means good games
Not many, especially when you add in receivers with the speed to stretch the field too.

Put me down as hoping for beating everyone left by 30+.

CVAPP
Posts: 1309
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:45 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Catawba Valley
Has thanked: 714 times
Been thanked: 306 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by CVAPP » Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:23 am

Close games are overrated. We are 1-1 in close games this year. That's enough excitement for me. I prefer we finish the season building insurmountable leads and get playing time for those that need it. Call me boring.

NewApp
Posts: 7499
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 960 times
Been thanked: 901 times
Contact:

Re: NMSU

Unread post by NewApp » Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:30 am

Rick83 wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:23 am
NewApp wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:15 am
Rick83 wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:07 am
I think our defense will be able to handle these guys. Saw this on the Appstatesports site:

THREE STRIKES AND YOU'RE OUT

By forcing three-and-outs on 51.1 percent of its possessions, the Mountaineers rank third at the FBS level. They have forced 24 three-and-outs on 47 defensive possessions.

That includes Savannah State, however.
True; however, almost all FBS teams schedule an easier FCS opponent. Here's the breakdown, the worst performance was against Texas State:

"App State forced three-and-outs on 8 of 13 possessions against Wake Forest, 2 of 10 at Texas State, 9 of 12 against Savannah State and 5 of 12 at Georgia. After the opening drive against Wake Forest, the Mountaineers forced five straight three-and-outs on their way to claiming a 9-3 halftime lead."

Good info, Rick.
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX

User avatar
/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09
Posts: 3108
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 2:05 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Virginia
Has thanked: 643 times
Been thanked: 1741 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by /\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 » Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:14 am

sixtoes9134 wrote:
Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:59 am
Our ongoing achilles is without a doubt the hurry up offense. We are NEVER ready for it.
First memory that popped in my head after reading this was the Miami game. Bubble screen after bubble screen after bubble screen. Same plays all in a hurry up, which our guys are looking to the sidelines.
Twitter: @brosef_yosef

mtnjax
Posts: 1564
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:34 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by mtnjax » Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:41 am

One thing to think about is, how does back to back road trips to the East affect NMSU?

User avatar
hapapp
Posts: 16575
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 12:48 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Rocky Mount, VA
Has thanked: 2429 times
Been thanked: 2764 times

Re: NMSU

Unread post by hapapp » Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:55 am

They do have some dynamic athletes on O and Rogers is stats-wise the top QB in the league. They also have picked off 8 balls this year. Needless to say, this is not likely an easy game.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”