Here is the link to the fall sports streaming schedule.
https://appstatesports.com/news/2023/8/ ... edule.aspx
https://appstatesports.com/news/2023/8/ ... edule.aspx
NSD today
-
- Posts: 9671
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 6414 times
- Been thanked: 4003 times
- NattyBumppo'sRevenge
- Posts: 3239
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 8:55 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Charlotte, NC
- Has thanked: 1730 times
- Been thanked: 1786 times
-
- Posts: 2683
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 12:00 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1955 times
- Been thanked: 1553 times
Re: NSD today
On a related note, this was on the App State Football Facebook page today:
On #NSD21, a quick look back at our 2016 and 2017 classes...
2016:
Class rank: 109
4-year record: 43-10
The Athletic re-rank: 28
2017:
Class rank: 107
4-year record: 42-10
The Athletic re-rank: 13
If the "re-ranks" are anywhere near accurate this demonstrates how great of a job our program does with recruiting and developing those recruits.
On #NSD21, a quick look back at our 2016 and 2017 classes...
2016:
Class rank: 109
4-year record: 43-10
The Athletic re-rank: 28
2017:
Class rank: 107
4-year record: 42-10
The Athletic re-rank: 13
If the "re-ranks" are anywhere near accurate this demonstrates how great of a job our program does with recruiting and developing those recruits.
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2018 12:58 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 335 times
- Been thanked: 197 times
Re: NSD today
Every signing day, I think back to consoling a very upset high school senior who wasn't signing a letter of intent. We both knew that if given the chance, his hard work would pay off. Thankful App gave him a chance to prove it!
-
- Posts: 6643
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Raleigh
- Has thanked: 3214 times
- Been thanked: 2805 times
Re: NSD today
Absolutely! Of course there's still subjectivity involved in the rerank, but it's ultimately results-based, and our results speak for themselves.Rick83 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:46 amOn a related note, this was on the App State Football Facebook page today:
On #NSD21, a quick look back at our 2016 and 2017 classes...
2016:
Class rank: 109
4-year record: 43-10
The Athletic re-rank: 28
2017:
Class rank: 107
4-year record: 42-10
The Athletic re-rank: 13
If the "re-ranks" are anywhere near accurate this demonstrates how great of a job our program does with recruiting and developing those recruits.
It also speaks to how much less reliable rankings are at the G5 level, given that both those classes were ranked sixth in the Sun Belt. In fact every one of our classes between 2015-2019 was ranked between fifth and seventh in the conference.
For reference, that 2017 class included:
-Noah Hannon
-Shaun Jolly
-Demetrius Taylor
-Thomas Hennigan
-Corey Sutton
-D'Marco Jackson
-Malik Williams
-Ryan Huff
-Daetrich Harrington
-Steven Jones
-Tim Frizzell
-EJ Scott
-George Blackstock
Lots of quality and depth!
2016 included:
-Darrynton Evans
-Clifton Duck
-Shemar Jean-Charles
-Zac Thomas
-Jordan Fehr
-Ryan Neuzil
-Baer Hunter
-Marcus Williams
-Kaiden Smith
-Jalen Virgil
-Cole Garrison
-Chris Willis
-Jacob Huesman
-Elijah Diarrassouba
-Caleb Spurlin
-Noel Cook
If anything you could argue that one was as good or even a little better than '17.
Both absolutely loaded classes. Satt's staff didn't have many down years in recruiting, despite what the rankings said at the time. Hopefully the current staff will continue that eye for talent, combined with being able to land higher-end prospects due to our extended success.
- Neer86
- Posts: 501
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2020 6:32 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 732 times
- Been thanked: 238 times
Re: NSD today
Those guys produced all those wins with 3 different head coaches.EastHallApp wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 12:07 pmAbsolutely! Of course there's still subjectivity involved in the rerank, but it's ultimately results-based, and our results speak for themselves.Rick83 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:46 amOn a related note, this was on the App State Football Facebook page today:
On #NSD21, a quick look back at our 2016 and 2017 classes...
2016:
Class rank: 109
4-year record: 43-10
The Athletic re-rank: 28
2017:
Class rank: 107
4-year record: 42-10
The Athletic re-rank: 13
If the "re-ranks" are anywhere near accurate this demonstrates how great of a job our program does with recruiting and developing those recruits.
It also speaks to how much less reliable rankings are at the G5 level, given that both those classes were ranked sixth in the Sun Belt. In fact every one of our classes between 2015-2019 was ranked between fifth and seventh in the conference.
For reference, that 2017 class included:
-Noah Hannon
-Shaun Jolly
-Demetrius Taylor
-Thomas Hennigan
-Corey Sutton
-D'Marco Jackson
-Malik Williams
-Ryan Huff
-Daetrich Harrington
-Steven Jones
-Tim Frizzell
-EJ Scott
-George Blackstock
Lots of quality and depth!
2016 included:
-Darrynton Evans
-Clifton Duck
-Shemar Jean-Charles
-Zac Thomas
-Jordan Fehr
-Ryan Neuzil
-Baer Hunter
-Marcus Williams
-Kaiden Smith
-Jalen Virgil
-Cole Garrison
-Chris Willis
-Jacob Huesman
-Elijah Diarrassouba
-Caleb Spurlin
-Noel Cook
If anything you could argue that one was as good or even a little better than '17.
Both absolutely loaded classes. Satt's staff didn't have many down years in recruiting, despite what the rankings said at the time. Hopefully the current staff will continue that eye for talent, combined with being able to land higher-end prospects due to our extended success.
That's pretty impressive. The rest of the Sun Belt Conference agrees.
- AtlAppMan
- Posts: 2045
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: ATL
- Has thanked: 95 times
- Been thanked: 1280 times
Re: NSD today
We have had numerous discussions on this exact topic. Initial recruiting class ranking vs actual results. This is the first time I have heard of the "re-rank" and happy you brought it to our attention.
Now that you introduced me to this I have a few related questions.
1. Did our coaches do a better job of identifying talented players than the
"scouts/analysts" (players that otherwise were flying under the radar) or did they just do a better job of coaching them up/cultivating them to their true potential? Or both (most likely)
2. Now that our school is getting a higher recruiting grade vs other FBS programs, is that just an adjustment to the above and we are not really getting any different level of talent but rather they are acknowledging the past rating failures OR are we really getting better starting/raw talent and assuming our coaches do the same with these players the ceiling is even higher for the recent recruits?
Now that you introduced me to this I have a few related questions.
1. Did our coaches do a better job of identifying talented players than the
"scouts/analysts" (players that otherwise were flying under the radar) or did they just do a better job of coaching them up/cultivating them to their true potential? Or both (most likely)
2. Now that our school is getting a higher recruiting grade vs other FBS programs, is that just an adjustment to the above and we are not really getting any different level of talent but rather they are acknowledging the past rating failures OR are we really getting better starting/raw talent and assuming our coaches do the same with these players the ceiling is even higher for the recent recruits?
-
- Posts: 5832
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 2474 times
Re: NSD today
That is probably (if remotely accurate) the best recruiting ranking you can hope for. I couldn’t care less what some service thinks about an 18 year old kid finishing up high school. I want to know how a group of 22 year old young men performed over a 4 year period. Again, if there is merit to those numbers we can really get it done. I’ve asked many times to see that kind of information. ThanksRick83 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:46 amOn a related note, this was on the App State Football Facebook page today:
On #NSD21, a quick look back at our 2016 and 2017 classes...
2016:
Class rank: 109
4-year record: 43-10
The Athletic re-rank: 28
2017:
Class rank: 107
4-year record: 42-10
The Athletic re-rank: 13
If the "re-ranks" are anywhere near accurate this demonstrates how great of a job our program does with recruiting and developing those recruits.
- McLeansvilleAppFan
- Posts: 9234
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Greensboro (McLeansville) NC
- Has thanked: 4167 times
- Been thanked: 2117 times
Re: NSD today
And not to take away from the coaching staff but it also shows, I would think, the skewed nature of the rankings in that I imagine in a blind test the same recruit hitting a Prig 5 program versus a Great 5 program will automatically have a higher ranking at a Prig 5 school, because Prig 5.Rick83 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:46 amOn a related note, this was on the App State Football Facebook page today:
On #NSD21, a quick look back at our 2016 and 2017 classes...
2016:
Class rank: 109
4-year record: 43-10
The Athletic re-rank: 28
2017:
Class rank: 107
4-year record: 42-10
The Athletic re-rank: 13
If the "re-ranks" are anywhere near accurate this demonstrates how great of a job our program does with recruiting and developing those recruits.
This is my very generic signature added to each post.
- APPdiesel
- Posts: 2566
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:53 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 788 times
- Been thanked: 1422 times
- Contact:
Re: NSD today
Write it down...
2021 class
Class rank: 69 (2020 class ranked 85th)
1st in the Sunbelt
9th overall in the group of 5
2021 class
Class rank: 69 (2020 class ranked 85th)
1st in the Sunbelt
9th overall in the group of 5
- Rekdiver
- Posts: 7557
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:14 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1440 times
- Been thanked: 3761 times
Re: NSD today
These yahoos don’t know C R A P....
They just look at measurables. You can’t predict heart and football IQ
They just look at measurables. You can’t predict heart and football IQ
- T-Dog
- Posts: 6566
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: Boone, NC
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 2567 times
Re: NSD today
The five stars and high four stars turn into the best college players more often than not for a reason. There's a reason Clemson, Ohio State and Alabama dominate every year, they get the best Jimmy's and Joe's. Also, they have the best resources and coaching to build on that blue-chip potential.
But once you get past that upper crust (Top 20-30 teams in recruiting rankings), recruiting rankings are just numbers and stars. It also comes down to coaching and if the resources fit that player the best. But you got to recruit four and three stars because of the perception to those high schoolers that take those rankings as gospel.
But once you get past that upper crust (Top 20-30 teams in recruiting rankings), recruiting rankings are just numbers and stars. It also comes down to coaching and if the resources fit that player the best. But you got to recruit four and three stars because of the perception to those high schoolers that take those rankings as gospel.
-
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2016 4:25 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Western South Carolina
- Has thanked: 364 times
- Been thanked: 358 times
Re: NSD today
“... you can’t predict heart and IQ ...”
I agree. And there are many college coaches out there that think if all the size and speed and other numbers are good, but the intangibles are not good (a high school coach tells the recruiter in all honesty that “the kid is hard to coach, doesn’t listen, is lazy, is hard headed, has a huge ego, etc...”) the high school coach couldn’t get it out of him, but the college coach thinks he can. Rarely, if ever, does it happen (a leopard doesn’t change his spots?). Then they fail to make headway with the kid and run him off.
I agree. And there are many college coaches out there that think if all the size and speed and other numbers are good, but the intangibles are not good (a high school coach tells the recruiter in all honesty that “the kid is hard to coach, doesn’t listen, is lazy, is hard headed, has a huge ego, etc...”) the high school coach couldn’t get it out of him, but the college coach thinks he can. Rarely, if ever, does it happen (a leopard doesn’t change his spots?). Then they fail to make headway with the kid and run him off.