Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Saint3333
Posts: 14498
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 8:42 am
Has thanked: 4062 times
Been thanked: 6301 times

Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by Saint3333 » Sun Sep 18, 2022 7:43 am

Still is a state of shock for here it goes.

Good: this team has so much grit and heart. Never give up, next man up is ever present throughout this group. Our WR question marks has been eased. Davis is going to be a very special player and while not as sure handed as last years group they are growing up fast. The OC use of the TE and presnap movement is the best since Drink and Satt. We have some stud linebackers.

Student showed well for game day!

Bad: tackling at the second level was noticeably worse this week, should be able to fix that with film. the secondary has taken a step back, we no longer have a shutdown corner tandem like Hayes, Duck, Shemar, Jolly etc. any team with a quality QB and oline is going to be tough for us this year.

Ugly: kickoff coverage, please kick the ball out of the endzone every time

2-1 through three is where a lot of us thought we’d be, huge game vs a very capable JMU with a good QB.

CoachRob
Posts: 511
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 12:27 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Burlington NC
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 391 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by CoachRob » Sun Sep 18, 2022 7:59 am

1st, We have had 3 straight weeks of physical, emotional, high level play. We need rest and need to get healthy fast.

2nd, Several may say this is a coaching issue, which it is not. I fear this may be more of a talent issue
We should have seen the signs this spring when we were hitting the portal hard for DBs. I just don't think we are as talented back there as in the past.

3rd, Our DL personal is A+ vs the run, but we have to bring Hampton or others to pressure the QB. Coupled with a struggling secondary and it's not a good mix.

JMU next week scares me, get past them and the schedule eases up for us a little.

User avatar
biggie
Site Admin
Posts: 8488
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:53 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Clemmons
Has thanked: 1712 times
Been thanked: 2257 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by biggie » Sun Sep 18, 2022 7:59 am

Yeah the lack of close coverage worries me the most.

And the injuries do keep piling up.

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:10 am

We speak of our depth at linebacker and the guys who have come in have done admirably but Cobb and Harrington are a step above right now and we are not quite at the plug and play level. We seem to play defense with a "don't let the guy get behind us" approach. We appear to be small in the secondary and we have faced some bigger dudes at receiver. We definitely need to heal up. Some injuries have been odd. I thought Shawn said Noel and Cobb practiced but didn't play. I figured Cobb who was in a sling last week might be down a few games but Noel was standing on the sideline at A@M but who knows. Cam didn't look great limping off. We might need to unleash that freshman beast. We just need to get the W next Saturday then play lots of guys against the Citadel.

diehardapp18
Posts: 768
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:21 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 331 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by diehardapp18 » Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:18 am

Good: I still think offensively we are very good if not the best in the conference. Especially when we get Nate back. Credit to Troy, I haven’t seen the breakdowns yet but it at least felt like they took our run away much more efficiently in the second half which obviously will make things more difficult for an App State O. But this unit seems as well balanced and as well coached as I can remember.

Bad: Defense looked lost in the first half again. To their credit, things looked better in the second half. It at least felt like the coverage was tighter and we consistently dialed up pressure but that QB just made play after play. We definitely have struggled so far with up tempo, pass heavy offenses. I’m not sure how many more we play but we’re struggling mightily with teams that quick offenses with good QB play.

Special teams coverage has got to be better obviously.

Black Saturday
Posts: 10692
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:22 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1018 times
Been thanked: 1177 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by Black Saturday » Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:49 am

I could fill the page with positives since we won. We had no business losing to Troy first place and no business winning at the end - what were the odds?, but that's why we have been undoubtedly the most exciting ticket over the years - Mountain Magic.

My concerns are just reiterations and blatantly obvious.

1) We have to have the worst KO coverage over the years no matter the coaching staff as we are magical in winning games over those years. It's been almost obligatory to give up KO TDs what seems more than our fair share in 40 years. Touchbacks I'd rather take my chances with on the 25 every time than the awesome stop or hit, than giving away the likely an extra 15-20+ yards of starting field position.

2) As in our losses to UL and WKU last year, UNC this year and maybe should have been Troy, we struggle with a QB that can pass, not sure if its our defensive personnel or scheme of both, but that is this teams Achilles.

Great Win and incalculable advertising this last week. Couldn't have happened to a better program than APP. I'd love for us to maximize it.

As mentioned on ESPN -we will likely have our staff picked with all this attention from our HC and OC. WVU has enough money to buy our HC if things continue to slide with Neal, who has had enough time to produce. If Barbay is here next season, I'll be surprised. Clark loves it here, but everybody has a price
BLACK SATURDAY

BambooRdApp
Posts: 5984
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:32 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 2311 times
Been thanked: 3947 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by BambooRdApp » Sun Sep 18, 2022 9:26 am

Hopefully, Peoples injury is not bad and Noel comes back soon. If the rule still is you can play 4 games and keep redshirt, I hope the new RB gets some opportunities during the year. With Harrington, Castle, WF transfer, etc., It seems those guys will get first shot for carries.
Post game...it was great to see Bruce helping students who were climbing over the wall ...I want to have on field celebrations after every game if that is what students want to do. They are college kids. I am sure DG and the staff will try to address the safety issues this week. What a great game.
Today I Give My All For Appalachian State!!
#FreeMillerHillForMoMoney!!

falcoapp
Posts: 320
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 3:27 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 183 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by falcoapp » Sun Sep 18, 2022 9:42 am

Any word on Peoples?

appfanjj
Posts: 1151
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:34 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1590 times
Been thanked: 502 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by appfanjj » Sun Sep 18, 2022 9:46 am

Good to know that if we play Troy in the conference championship game we have home field in our pocket.

Yosefus
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 11:50 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 788 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by Yosefus » Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:07 am

Good: we won in historic fashion. Stormed the field
Bad: defense secondary and special teams still need work.
Ugly: folks getting injured storming field.

Offense will need to do ball control next week like they did at A&M. We need to keep JMU offense off field next week.

Seattleapp
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:00 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 4491 times
Been thanked: 1280 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by Seattleapp » Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:26 am

If I’m the coach, Ronald Clarke is on tackling drills all week.

User avatar
ah59396
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2014 3:28 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1409 times
Been thanked: 1795 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by ah59396 » Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:53 am

Black Saturday wrote:
Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:49 am
I could fill the page with positives since we won. We had no business losing to Troy first place and no business winning at the end - what were the odds?, but that's why we have been undoubtedly the most exciting ticket over the years - Mountain Magic.

My concerns are just reiterations and blatantly obvious.

1) We have to have the worst KO coverage over the years no matter the coaching staff as we are magical in winning games over those years. It's been almost obligatory to give up KO TDs what seems more than our fair share in 40 years. Touchbacks I'd rather take my chances with on the 25 every time than the awesome stop or hit, than giving away the likely an extra 15-20+ yards of starting field position.

2) As in our losses to UL and WKU last year, UNC this year and maybe should have been Troy, we struggle with a QB that can pass, not sure if its our defensive personnel or scheme of both, but that is this teams Achilles.

Great Win and incalculable advertising this last week. Couldn't have happened to a better program than APP. I'd love for us to maximize it.

As mentioned on ESPN -we will likely have our staff picked with all this attention from our HC and OC. WVU has enough money to buy our HC if things continue to slide with Neal, who has had enough time to produce. If Barbay is here next season, I'll be surprised. Clark loves it here, but everybody has a price
We will be very lucky if we get a second season of Kevin Barbay.
YNWA

Seattleapp
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:00 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 4491 times
Been thanked: 1280 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by Seattleapp » Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:57 am

ah59396 wrote:
Sun Sep 18, 2022 10:53 am
Black Saturday wrote:
Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:49 am
I could fill the page with positives since we won. We had no business losing to Troy first place and no business winning at the end - what were the odds?, but that's why we have been undoubtedly the most exciting ticket over the years - Mountain Magic.

My concerns are just reiterations and blatantly obvious.

1) We have to have the worst KO coverage over the years no matter the coaching staff as we are magical in winning games over those years. It's been almost obligatory to give up KO TDs what seems more than our fair share in 40 years. Touchbacks I'd rather take my chances with on the 25 every time than the awesome stop or hit, than giving away the likely an extra 15-20+ yards of starting field position.

2) As in our losses to UL and WKU last year, UNC this year and maybe should have been Troy, we struggle with a QB that can pass, not sure if its our defensive personnel or scheme of both, but that is this teams Achilles.

Great Win and incalculable advertising this last week. Couldn't have happened to a better program than APP. I'd love for us to maximize it.

As mentioned on ESPN -we will likely have our staff picked with all this attention from our HC and OC. WVU has enough money to buy our HC if things continue to slide with Neal, who has had enough time to produce. If Barbay is here next season, I'll be surprised. Clark loves it here, but everybody has a price
We will be very lucky if we get a second season of Kevin Barbay.
Honestly if we could keep this staff in tact we really could have a Cincinnati type run

User avatar
appstatealum
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:45 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Charlotte/Gastonia
Has thanked: 3526 times
Been thanked: 1932 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by appstatealum » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:12 am

Saint3333 wrote:
Sun Sep 18, 2022 7:43 am
Still is a state of shock for here it goes.

Good: this team has so much grit and heart. Never give up, next man up is ever present throughout this group. Our WR question marks has been eased. Davis is going to be a very special player and while not as sure handed as last years group they are growing up fast. The OC use of the TE and presnap movement is the best since Drink and Satt. We have some stud linebackers.

Student showed well for game day!

Bad: tackling at the second level was noticeably worse this week, should be able to fix that with film. the secondary has taken a step back, we no longer have a shutdown corner tandem like Hayes, Duck, Shemar, Jolly etc. any team with a quality QB and oline is going to be tough for us this year.

Ugly: kickoff coverage, please kick the ball out of the endzone every time

2-1 through three is where a lot of us thought we’d be, huge game vs a very capable JMU with a good QB.
Agree on all points. I feel better about the hands of our TEs but our WRs have so much physical talent, I'm hoping this elevates Horns confidence and he could be that "go to" deep
The Appalachian State

User avatar
appstatealum
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:45 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Charlotte/Gastonia
Has thanked: 3526 times
Been thanked: 1932 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by appstatealum » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:20 am

Most frustrating things- the things I think stood out the most from last week to this week..

1. We abandoned the run /ball control approach. Cam and Co. were picking up chunk yards. Keep running if they can't stop it.

2. Blocks downfield weren't being sustained.

3. Secondary was just off again. The quick dumps and stretches kill us. Not sure if Dale can find a way to drop LBs back to cut those off but UnC/AM/Troy all took advantage (some better than others).

4. Special teams. We just don't have those crash test dummy guys. Kick it through the endzone, please.

All things we can work with, film study should be enlightening this week. Glad we took the dub regardless of the less than stellar play.
The Appalachian State

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:35 am

I don't know if it's a strategy on kickoffs to attempt higher ones that land inside the 5 in hopes that the opponents will bring them out and if covered we keep them behind the 25 which is a win- but I hate that. Just bust a kick and roll on at the 25. That alternate option is almost a given they get to the 40 or worse. I don't think our kicker can get that height on long kicks.

User avatar
Rekdiver
Posts: 7736
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:14 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1506 times
Been thanked: 3910 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by Rekdiver » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:37 am

Not only good… but great:

Black Saturday
Posts: 10692
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:22 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1018 times
Been thanked: 1177 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by Black Saturday » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:45 am

appstatealum wrote:
Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:20 am
Most frustrating things- the things I think stood out the most from last week to this week..

1. We abandoned the run /ball control approach. Cam and Co. were picking up chunk yards. Keep running if they can't stop it.

2. Blocks downfield weren't being sustained.

3. Secondary was just off again. The quick dumps and stretches kill us. Not sure if Dale can find a way to drop LBs back to cut those off but UnC/AM/Troy all took advantage (some better than others).

4. Special teams. We just don't have those crash test dummy guys. Kick it through the endzone, please.

All things we can work with, film study should be enlightening this week. Glad we took the dub regardless of the less than stellar play.
Ha - Troy sure didn't abandon their passing game that we couldn't stop.
BLACK SATURDAY

WASU 93
Posts: 1698
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 10:51 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 956 times
Been thanked: 1111 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by WASU 93 » Sun Sep 18, 2022 11:54 am

The Great: As my buddy spacemonkey said, "You couldn't have written a better script for yesterday". Game Day, our fans, Luke Combs playing the roll of Superfan, Miracle on the Mountain 2, the fans that were there to see it (in the early 90's, half of the crowd would have left at halftime and there would have been less than a quarter of the crowd there to see the final play)

The Good: Our depth at running back. In the last two weeks, we have had our #3, #4 and #5 running back all score TD's in meaningful situations. Peoples also ran hard yesterday.

The Questionable: As good as the game calling was last week, I think Barbay was a little too gimmicky yesterday. Our offense did not have the great rhythm that we had in Week 1 and Week 2. We also abandoned the deep back shoulder routes (until Robinson made a great catch in the 4th Quarter). I think that is the only time we tested Troy deep, until the final play.

The Bad: Due to injuries or whatever, we do not have a Championship defense at this point. Perhaps it shows how great DeMarco Jackson was last year at both roaming sideline to sideline and also dropping back 20 yards into the passing lane. The chunk running plays we give up worry me more than the secondary (where I do have some concerns).
Gunnar Wilson threw for 355 yards against Louisiana last year (on 55 attempts) and threw for 235 and three scores against Coastal. But, we held him to 109 yards passing last November. He's a 5th year, Junior and made good decisions with the ball yesterday. They will have success in the passing game all year.

The Ugly---Sure we've given up a few Kickoff Return TD's in the past few years. But, we've also been very good at pinning the opposing teams inside the 25 yard line on returned kickoffs. This year, we don't have players getting free releases downfield. Perhaps it is hang time, perhaps it is ball placement (not close enough to the left sideline) or maybe we just don't have the blockade runners that we've had in the past. But, we have to fix this area.
For those who say to kick it out of the end zone every time, I question if game fatigue plays a factor and if that is an option in the 4th quarter. Regardless, it needs to be fixed. With our current defensive play, we need to keep momentum after a score.

Saint3333
Posts: 14498
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 8:42 am
Has thanked: 4062 times
Been thanked: 6301 times

Re: Morning after: Good, bad, ugly

Unread post by Saint3333 » Sun Sep 18, 2022 12:07 pm

Unless we score 70 the kicker shouldn’t be fatigued.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”