A Running Metrics Thread
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7569 times
- Been thanked: 4833 times
A Running Metrics Thread
I’ve decided to start a thread to track certain metrics that have come up in the past. I’ll add as we go with each week and running cumulative. If there is anything else that is of interest, let me know.
Drives App - 12 resulting in 6 TDs, 1 FG, 1 MFG, 4 punts. 58% of drives ended in points. 66% ended in a scoring opportunity.
GW - 11 drives (discounting end of half possessions) 3 TDs, 1 FG, 4 punts, 3 TOs. 36% of drives ended in points,
3rd Down Conversions
App - 4-13. Converted 5 but 1 nullified by penalty. Avg 3rd YTG 8 yds. 8 passes with an avg of 6.5 YTG. 6 runs with and avg of 10 YTG. 3 1st Downs converted via pass (10, 3, 3). 1 via run by Haywood (2). 3 failed 3rd conversions were converted on 4th. 2 by run. (Haywood for 3 and Aguilar 1). 1 pass for a TD.
GW - 7-17. 5 conversions by pass, 2 by run. 2 4th down conversions via run (1, 3).
Drives App - 12 resulting in 6 TDs, 1 FG, 1 MFG, 4 punts. 58% of drives ended in points. 66% ended in a scoring opportunity.
GW - 11 drives (discounting end of half possessions) 3 TDs, 1 FG, 4 punts, 3 TOs. 36% of drives ended in points,
3rd Down Conversions
App - 4-13. Converted 5 but 1 nullified by penalty. Avg 3rd YTG 8 yds. 8 passes with an avg of 6.5 YTG. 6 runs with and avg of 10 YTG. 3 1st Downs converted via pass (10, 3, 3). 1 via run by Haywood (2). 3 failed 3rd conversions were converted on 4th. 2 by run. (Haywood for 3 and Aguilar 1). 1 pass for a TD.
GW - 7-17. 5 conversions by pass, 2 by run. 2 4th down conversions via run (1, 3).
- WVAPPeer
- Posts: 12424
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:14 am
- School: Other
- Location: Born: Almost Heaven
- Has thanked: 4903 times
- Been thanked: 2627 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread

"Montani Semper Liberi"
The Dude Abides!!!
The Dude Abides!!!
-
- Posts: 3005
- Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:49 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: South Carolina
- Has thanked: 1469 times
- Been thanked: 980 times
- Contact:
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
As 4th downs are important to us, I would add 4th down conversions. We were 4 for 4 against Webb.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 10:17 amI’ve decided to start a thread to track certain metrics that have come up in the past. I’ll add as we go with each week and running cumulative. If there is anything else that is of interest, let me know.
Drives App - 12 resulting in 6 TDs, 1 FG, 1 MFG, 4 punts. 58% of drives ended in points. 66% ended in a scoring opportunity.
GW - 11 drives (discounting end of half possessions) 3 TDs, 1 FG, 4 punts, 3 TOs. 36% of drives ended in points,
3rd Down Conversions
App - 4-13. Converted 5 but 1 nullified by penalty. Avg 3rd YTG 8 yds. 8 passes with an avg of 6.5 YTG. 6 runs with and avg of 10 YTG. 3 1st Downs converted via pass (10, 3, 3). 1 via run by Haywood (2). 3 failed 3rd conversions were converted on 4th. 2 by run. (Haywood for 3 and Aguilar 1). 1 pass for a TD.
GW - 7-17. 5 conversions by pass, 2 by run. 2 4th down conversions via run (1, 3).
-
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2023 9:51 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
How about first downs allowed when the opponent is in 3rd and 5 or longer? Those were brutal last year. And also for App's offense the number of 3rd and 5 to go in which we run up the gut and fail.
- BeauFoster
- Posts: 6870
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:42 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: In a cubicle
- Has thanked: 1739 times
- Been thanked: 2163 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
So am i reading it correctly that the average to go distance on 3rd down when we ran was 10 yards? That’s quite interesting. I’m not sure if we were “giving up”, hoping to catch the defense looking for pass, or just playing it as a 2 down situation (or a combo, situation-dependent thing).
These are the kinds of analytics that coaches are using now, heavily. They quickly reveal tendencies.
These are the kinds of analytics that coaches are using now, heavily. They quickly reveal tendencies.
Give 'em hell!
-
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2023 9:51 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
Based on tendencies if you are playing us and we are faced with 3rd and 7 leave the receivers open and put 11 in the box. We are going to run the ball.BeauFoster wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:47 pmSo am i reading it correctly that the average to go distance on 3rd down when we ran was 10 yards? That’s quite interesting. I’m not sure if we were “giving up”, hoping to catch the defense looking for pass, or just playing it as a 2 down situation (or a combo, situation-dependent thing).
These are the kinds of analytics that coaches are using now, heavily. They quickly reveal tendencies.
Being a bit sarcastic but not completely
-
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 5:51 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 248 times
- Been thanked: 636 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
Reminds me of the late John Fox years with the Panthers. Yikes.Bigdaddyg1 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:07 pmBased on tendencies if you are playing us and we are faced with 3rd and 7 leave the receivers open and put 11 in the box. We are going to run the ball.BeauFoster wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:47 pmSo am i reading it correctly that the average to go distance on 3rd down when we ran was 10 yards? That’s quite interesting. I’m not sure if we were “giving up”, hoping to catch the defense looking for pass, or just playing it as a 2 down situation (or a combo, situation-dependent thing).
These are the kinds of analytics that coaches are using now, heavily. They quickly reveal tendencies.
Being a bit sarcastic but not completely
“I don’t like talking to people I know, but strangers I have no problem with.” -Larry David
- BeauFoster
- Posts: 6870
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:42 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: In a cubicle
- Has thanked: 1739 times
- Been thanked: 2163 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
That would be my concern - I’m too lazy to go back and do the math, but it would be interesting to see this same deep dive for last season. I’d guess that it would be somewhat similar (if not exactly the same). I get that “this is how we do it in Boone”, but if you’re not Alabama, with a stable full of future NFLers on the oline, you might need to mix things up every now and then.Bigdaddyg1 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:07 pmBased on tendencies if you are playing us and we are faced with 3rd and 7 leave the receivers open and put 11 in the box. We are going to run the ball.BeauFoster wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:47 pmSo am i reading it correctly that the average to go distance on 3rd down when we ran was 10 yards? That’s quite interesting. I’m not sure if we were “giving up”, hoping to catch the defense looking for pass, or just playing it as a 2 down situation (or a combo, situation-dependent thing).
These are the kinds of analytics that coaches are using now, heavily. They quickly reveal tendencies.
Being a bit sarcastic but not completely
I hope to see some “abnormalities” this coming weekend.
Give 'em hell!
-
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2023 9:51 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
I'd love to see some play action but that requires giving the QB more than 3 seconds to throw the ball.
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7569 times
- Been thanked: 4833 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
3 failed 3rd conversions were converted on 4th. 2 by run. (Haywood for 3 and Aguilar 1). 1 pass for a TD.appstate77 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 12:42 pmAs 4th downs are important to us, I would add 4th down conversions. We were 4 for 4 against Webb.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 10:17 amI’ve decided to start a thread to track certain metrics that have come up in the past. I’ll add as we go with each week and running cumulative. If there is anything else that is of interest, let me know.
Drives App - 12 resulting in 6 TDs, 1 FG, 1 MFG, 4 punts. 58% of drives ended in points. 66% ended in a scoring opportunity.
GW - 11 drives (discounting end of half possessions) 3 TDs, 1 FG, 4 punts, 3 TOs. 36% of drives ended in points,
3rd Down Conversions
App - 4-13. Converted 5 but 1 nullified by penalty. Avg 3rd YTG 8 yds. 8 passes with an avg of 6.5 YTG. 6 runs with and avg of 10 YTG. 3 1st Downs converted via pass (10, 3, 3). 1 via run by Haywood (2). 3 failed 3rd conversions were converted on 4th. 2 by run. (Haywood for 3 and Aguilar 1). 1 pass for a TD.
GW - 7-17. 5 conversions by pass, 2 by run. 2 4th down conversions via run (1, 3).
- AppDub
- Posts: 1477
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:52 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1481 times
- Been thanked: 706 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
Good old Dan Henning as the OC then. Run left, run right, run middle, punt. Very exciting.App_in_Maiden wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:09 pmReminds me of the late John Fox years with the Panthers. Yikes.Bigdaddyg1 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 2:07 pmBased on tendencies if you are playing us and we are faced with 3rd and 7 leave the receivers open and put 11 in the box. We are going to run the ball.BeauFoster wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:47 pmSo am i reading it correctly that the average to go distance on 3rd down when we ran was 10 yards? That’s quite interesting. I’m not sure if we were “giving up”, hoping to catch the defense looking for pass, or just playing it as a 2 down situation (or a combo, situation-dependent thing).
These are the kinds of analytics that coaches are using now, heavily. They quickly reveal tendencies.
Being a bit sarcastic but not completely
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7569 times
- Been thanked: 4833 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
I would imagine that there are a few variables to factor. What the defense is playing to defend and location on the field are probably the two biggest factors.BeauFoster wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:47 pmSo am i reading it correctly that the average to go distance on 3rd down when we ran was 10 yards? That’s quite interesting. I’m not sure if we were “giving up”, hoping to catch the defense looking for pass, or just playing it as a 2 down situation (or a combo, situation-dependent thing).
These are the kinds of analytics that coaches are using now, heavily. They quickly reveal tendencies.
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7569 times
- Been thanked: 4833 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
GW converted 7 3rd downs. They converted 3rd & __:Bigdaddyg1 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:23 pmHow about first downs allowed when the opponent is in 3rd and 5 or longer? Those were brutal last year. And also for App's offense the number of 3rd and 5 to go in which we run up the gut and fail.
1 via pass
11 via pass
11 via run
5 via pass
2 via run
5 via pass
4 via pass.
They were 4/11 on 3rd downs of 5 yds or greater.
They also had a 3rd & 7 where they got 6 and converted a 4th & 1 and a 3rd & 4 where they got 2 and converted 4th & 2.
-
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2023 9:51 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1066 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
I guess you can look at most any stat or variable but I'd be interested to know how 3rd and 10+ shook out for both our defense and offense last year. I would bet we gave up way more than we executed on our side.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:11 pmGW converted 7 3rd downs. They converted 3rd & __:Bigdaddyg1 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:23 pmHow about first downs allowed when the opponent is in 3rd and 5 or longer? Those were brutal last year. And also for App's offense the number of 3rd and 5 to go in which we run up the gut and fail.
1 via pass
11 via pass
11 via run
5 via pass
2 via run
5 via pass
4 via pass.
They were 4/11 on 3rd downs of 5 yds or greater.
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7569 times
- Been thanked: 4833 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
You are probably correct about last year. I may go back through the game logs from last year and look if I get some time.Bigdaddyg1 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:16 pmI guess you can look at most any stat or variable but I'd be interested to know how 3rd and 10+ shook out for both our defense and offense last year. I would bet we gave up way more than we executed on our side.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:11 pmGW converted 7 3rd downs. They converted 3rd & __:Bigdaddyg1 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:23 pmHow about first downs allowed when the opponent is in 3rd and 5 or longer? Those were brutal last year. And also for App's offense the number of 3rd and 5 to go in which we run up the gut and fail.
1 via pass
11 via pass
11 via run
5 via pass
2 via run
5 via pass
4 via pass.
They were 4/11 on 3rd downs of 5 yds or greater.
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7569 times
- Been thanked: 4833 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
Another interesting breakdown; We were 3/8 with Burger. A 4th conversion was called back for holding. We converted one of those on 4th down.
We were 1/5 on 3rd with Aguilar with two of those converted on 4th down. Also had a FG off one of those failed attempts as well.
We were 1/5 on 3rd with Aguilar with two of those converted on 4th down. Also had a FG off one of those failed attempts as well.
-
- Posts: 5779
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2019 9:32 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 2198 times
- Been thanked: 3809 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
The question is .what was the down and distance. Neither of those 3rd % are very good. However, I seem to remember that Burger had a couple of 3rd and double digits due his fumble and another due to penalty if my memory serves me rightAppSt94 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:25 pmAnother interesting breakdown; We were 3/8 with Burger. A 4th conversion was called back for holding. We converted one of those on 4th down.
We were 1/5 on 3rd with Aguilar with two of those converted on 4th down. Also had a FG off one of those failed attempts as well.
Today I Give My All For Appalachian State!!
#FreeMillerHillForMoMoney!!
#FreeMillerHillForMoMoney!!
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7569 times
- Been thanked: 4833 times
Re: A Running Metrics Thread
https://appstatesports.com/sports/footb ... score/8606BambooRdApp wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:38 pmThe question is .what was the down and distance. Neither of those 3rd % are very good. However, I seem to remember that Burger had a couple of 3rd and double digits due his fumble and another due to penalty if my memory serves me rightAppSt94 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:25 pmAnother interesting breakdown; We were 3/8 with Burger. A 4th conversion was called back for holding. We converted one of those on 4th down.
We were 1/5 on 3rd with Aguilar with two of those converted on 4th down. Also had a FG off one of those failed attempts as well.