W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

User avatar
YesAppCan
Posts: 5879
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:52 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro
Has thanked: 1602 times
Been thanked: 568 times

W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by YesAppCan » Sun Sep 22, 2013 10:42 am


moehler
Posts: 1378
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:01 am
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by moehler » Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:27 am

I cant remember a positive article written about the program in the last year, I think part of this is the dismissal of Moore, for some reason alot of these "part time hack beat reporters" took offense to him being let go, and are taking a negative attitude towards us, and second, alot of them don't believe we should be moving up, how dare our little program try and compete with the beloved Tar Heels, Wolf Packs etc, in their eyes, we don't know our place, we should just stay in the FCS, play the Cits, Furmans, and WC of the world, and forever stay in the shadows of the ACC schools. Even this article, had more of a negative tone that we don't know what we are doing, than about the positives of beating Elon.

User avatar
asu66
Posts: 26935
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 1:21 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 2044 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by asu66 » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:03 pm

Maybe this guy (SHamilton) aspires to achieve the reputation that the ASHEVILLE CITIZEN-TIMES' reporter Keith Jarrett "enjoys" in the 'Whee. If so, he's off to a good start!

He's already earned a top placement on my ignore list!
Proud triple-degree App grad--Classes of '66, '70 and '81.
If it happens to the Apps, it happens to me!

User avatar
Gonzo
Posts: 4899
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:11 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 568 times
Been thanked: 1983 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by Gonzo » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:15 pm

moehler wrote:I cant remember a positive article written about the program in the last year, I think part of this is the dismissal of Moore, for some reason alot of these "part time hack beat reporters" took offense to him being let go, and are taking a negative attitude towards us, and second, alot of them don't believe we should be moving up, how dare our little program try and compete with the beloved Tar Heels, Wolf Packs etc, in their eyes, we don't know our place, we should just stay in the FCS, play the Cits, Furmans, and WC of the world, and forever stay in the shadows of the ACC schools. Even this article, had more of a negative tone that we don't know what we are doing, than about the positives of beating Elon.
Tommy Bownman's article was much more objective. You might be right about the other WSJ sports writers, but I haven't gotten that vibe from Bowman since the FBS announcement and the Moore debacle.

I'm just glad we're still the primary college football team for a paper in a relatively large city/media market. I'd take the quality and frequency of Bowman and the WSJ's coverage over David Scott and that rag in Charlotte any day.

User avatar
YesAppCan
Posts: 5879
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:52 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro
Has thanked: 1602 times
Been thanked: 568 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by YesAppCan » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:18 pm

Gonz, I gotta agree with you on this one.. Tommy has been very fair and objective with us, especially in the last year.

User avatar
firemoose
Posts: 8275
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Has thanked: 921 times
Been thanked: 3940 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by firemoose » Sun Sep 22, 2013 12:26 pm

The only time we get coverage in Charlotte these days, TV or paper, is if something bad happens. Even today the story is a reprint of Bowman's article. Didn't even care enough to have one of their own writers type a story. No mention at all on either WSOC or WBTV. We get more coverage in the market we're not even in than we do in our "home market".

moehler
Posts: 1378
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:01 am
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by moehler » Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:45 pm

oops, forgot about Tommy, your right, he is pretty much the only one that seems to give us a fair shake, but the rest of them, sorry, I just don't have a lot of respect for their writing abiitly

User avatar
YesAppCan
Posts: 5879
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:52 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro
Has thanked: 1602 times
Been thanked: 568 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by YesAppCan » Sun Sep 22, 2013 2:57 pm

Moose, Greensboro did the same re-print of Tommy's article... 25 minutes down the road

User avatar
firemoose
Posts: 8275
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Has thanked: 921 times
Been thanked: 3940 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by firemoose » Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:32 pm

YesAppCan wrote:Moose, Greensboro did the same re-print of Tommy's article... 25 minutes down the road
But we're not in the Triad market. We are in the Charlotte market.

JCline0429
Posts: 2180
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:17 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by JCline0429 » Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:43 am

firemoose wrote:
YesAppCan wrote:Moose, Greensboro did the same re-print of Tommy's article... 25 minutes down the road
But we're not in the Triad market. We are in the Charlotte market.
We get more coverage out of the WSJ than all the other papers combined.
a.k.a JC0429

User avatar
firemoose
Posts: 8275
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:20 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Has thanked: 921 times
Been thanked: 3940 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by firemoose » Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:19 am

JCline0429 wrote:
firemoose wrote:
YesAppCan wrote:Moose, Greensboro did the same re-print of Tommy's article... 25 minutes down the road
But we're not in the Triad market. We are in the Charlotte market.
We get more coverage out of the WSJ than all the other papers combined.
Yep JC...That's pretty much my whole point. Ever since the announcement of football coming back to Charlotte our coverage has been dropping from the little we got to almost nothing, both TV and print. I know Charlotte is a bigger market than the Triad but what's the point of being considered to be in a bigger market if we get no coverage in that market. Years ago we used to get the Triad stations on Boone cable. Not any more. We get Charlotte and Tri-Cities stations. And at least we usually get a mention on the Tennessee stations.

User avatar
ASUMountaineer
Posts: 7250
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:20 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: State of Appalachian
Has thanked: 98 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by ASUMountaineer » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:47 am

firemoose wrote:
JCline0429 wrote:
firemoose wrote:
YesAppCan wrote:Moose, Greensboro did the same re-print of Tommy's article... 25 minutes down the road
But we're not in the Triad market. We are in the Charlotte market.
We get more coverage out of the WSJ than all the other papers combined.
Yep JC...That's pretty much my whole point. Ever since the announcement of football coming back to Charlotte our coverage has been dropping from the little we got to almost nothing, both TV and print. I know Charlotte is a bigger market than the Triad but what's the point of being considered to be in a bigger market if we get no coverage in that market. Years ago we used to get the Triad stations on Boone cable. Not any more. We get Charlotte and Tri-Cities stations. And at least we usually get a mention on the Tennessee stations.
If we win at the next level, we'll get coverage.
Poster formerly known as AppState03 (MMB) and currently known as ASUMountaineer everywhere else.

appbio91
Posts: 2490
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:00 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 238 times
Been thanked: 468 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by appbio91 » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:01 am

Don't see this as negative. It is actually quite objective look at the state of things in Boone. Get used to it. This will continue until we prove the doubters wrong.

HeffnerIV
Posts: 1032
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:44 pm
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 160 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by HeffnerIV » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:17 am

appbio91 wrote:Don't see this as negative. It is actually quite objective look at the state of things in Boone. Get used to it. This will continue until we prove the doubters wrong.
Agreed. We can't get all in a wad every time we're criticized. If they're criticizing, they're paying attention.

JCline0429
Posts: 2180
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:17 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by JCline0429 » Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:08 pm

firemoose wrote:
JCline0429 wrote:
firemoose wrote:
YesAppCan wrote:Moose, Greensboro did the same re-print of Tommy's article... 25 minutes down the road
But we're not in the Triad market. We are in the Charlotte market.
We get more coverage out of the WSJ than all the other papers combined.
Yep JC...That's pretty much my whole point. Ever since the announcement of football coming back to Charlotte our coverage has been dropping from the little we got to almost nothing, both TV and print. I know Charlotte is a bigger market than the Triad but what's the point of being considered to be in a bigger market if we get no coverage in that market. Years ago we used to get the Triad stations on Boone cable. Not any more. We get Charlotte and Tri-Cities stations. And at least we usually get a mention on the Tennessee stations.
We are going to get even less coverage in Charlotte with the 49'ers having football.
a.k.a JC0429

fjblair
Posts: 3394
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:03 pm
Has thanked: 1378 times
Been thanked: 528 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by fjblair » Mon Sep 23, 2013 5:07 pm

I didn't think the article was all that negative. What do you want, we are 1-2 and the first 2 games were complete disasters. What's more troubling to me is that he Charlotte Observer did not write a single sentence about the Elon game. Nothing.

They glossed over UNCC's last two beat downs but even they really aren't getting the amount of coverage you might expect.

appbio91
Posts: 2490
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:00 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 238 times
Been thanked: 468 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by appbio91 » Mon Sep 23, 2013 5:28 pm

fjblair wrote:I didn't think the article was all that negative. What do you want, we are 1-2 and the first 2 games were complete disasters. What's more troubling to me is that he Charlotte Observer did not write a single sentence about the Elon game. Nothing.

They glossed over UNCC's last two beat downs but even they really aren't getting the amount of coverage you might expect.
I complained once by email to the observer about lack of coverage and was told their readers are looking for more of a national picture when it comes to sports. They don't see themselves as a local paper. Like everything else in Charlotte they have an over inflated self image.

User avatar
MAD Doctor
Posts: 2366
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:38 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 316 times
Been thanked: 1640 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by MAD Doctor » Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:17 pm

I didn't think the article was that bad either, just a stupid line at the end that was a weak attempt to be clever. The bottom line is that no sportswriters are waiting in line to write a positive, feel-good article about a team with 1-2 record. Our "new normal" will be determined on the field, not a tobacco road cubicle.

User avatar
AtlAppMan
Posts: 2227
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: ATL
Has thanked: 108 times
Been thanked: 1476 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by AtlAppMan » Mon Sep 23, 2013 11:24 pm

Right now we don't have much choice but to take our lumps. We have not played well and are going through a rebuilding cycle. I wasn't that offended by the article and actually glad we got some pub. Even so, it does sting a bit but that doesn't get me pissed at the writer.

Now the News and Observer hack after A&T game just misrepresented facts and that does piss me off.

User avatar
Maddog1956
Posts: 1047
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 12:03 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: W-S J--Scott Hamilton article

Unread post by Maddog1956 » Tue Sep 24, 2013 7:23 am

fjblair wrote: They glossed over UNCC's last two beat downs but even they really aren't getting the amount of coverage you might expect.
Before their first game and after winning their first two game they were covered in print and tv, almost everywhere. Even the weather report would say that game weather looked good for them.

Since their beat down, nothing. I haven't seen anything in print or tv (not that I have been looking).

Charlotte can't stand another losing team. And I don't really say this a negative to UNCC, in my opinion they have great potential in attracting players and being covered in the media and should be able to build a great team in the future, but I think they needed a reality check after their first two games.
Image

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”