

Not only do we need the best teams to join we also need to make sure we don't have the worst teams. Our payout was the lowest (although not much less than all but MWC) becasue we had 3 of the worst teams in the nation. Voting out Idaho and NMSU would help the league rating and lower costs. There really is no reason to have them in the league.MDaniels84 wrote:JTApps,
This is why each conference should be looking for the best football programs and not just look at towns in which they are located. Teams like App can be a real boost to their respective conferences and pay dividends down the road.
Each Sun Belt is slotted to get $1,087,586. Big C brought up a good point that we (as well as GS) only get half this year due to being transitional. We will get the full payout going forward which will vary each year depending on the leagues performance. Most years it will be a little over $1 mil with the potential to be $2 mil+ if we have a team in an access bowl.Rekdiver wrote:What will our payout be..and then how much did we estimate the jump would cost?
We get the money whether we play post season or not. And it is only 1 game of expenses, unlike the FCS where there was a possibility of 2,3,4 games (for team and fans).JTApps1 wrote:Each Sun Belt is slotted to get $1,087,586. Big C brought up a good point that we (as well as GS) only get half this year due to being transitional. We will get the full payout going forward which will vary each year depending on the leagues performance. Most years it will be a little over $1 mil with the potential to be $2 mil+ if we have a team in an access bowl.Rekdiver wrote:What will our payout be..and then how much did we estimate the jump would cost?
Much better deal than we ever had in FCS.