I swear I feel better about App football than I have in 8 or 9 years.

Well I was wondering the same thing. Same team? Different players, different head coach, different AD, different league. Different OC different DC What is the same?S.Lewis15 wrote:I think Boise State is what every G5 team wants to emulate. Heck, they were even on the cover of the EA NCAA football game a couple years ago.
Will we ever reach that level? I hope so, but I think it will take quite a few years. If we stay at the top of the Sun Belt over that time, win games against top tier G5 teams and a few low to mid tier P5 teams, I can see us getting some National Attention especially if we do well in bowl games.
I couldn't help but take notice when the ASN announcers were talking about our team yesterday that they kept reminding fans that "this is the same team that beat Michigan and won 3 straight Nat'l Championships." Sure those were great things in our history, but this year's team and future teams have nothing to do with those events. Will we ever get past being known as the team who beat Michigan?
Our commitment to fielding the best program possible.bcoach wrote:Well I was wondering the same thing. Same team? Different players, different head coach, different AD, different league. Different OC different DC What is the same?S.Lewis15 wrote:I think Boise State is what every G5 team wants to emulate. Heck, they were even on the cover of the EA NCAA football game a couple years ago.
Will we ever reach that level? I hope so, but I think it will take quite a few years. If we stay at the top of the Sun Belt over that time, win games against top tier G5 teams and a few low to mid tier P5 teams, I can see us getting some National Attention especially if we do well in bowl games.
I couldn't help but take notice when the ASN announcers were talking about our team yesterday that they kept reminding fans that "this is the same team that beat Michigan and won 3 straight Nat'l Championships." Sure those were great things in our history, but this year's team and future teams have nothing to do with those events. Will we ever get past being known as the team who beat Michigan?
AppinVA wrote:Our commitment to fielding the best program possible.bcoach wrote:Well I was wondering the same thing. Same team? Different players, different head coach, different AD, different league. Different OC different DC What is the same?S.Lewis15 wrote:I think Boise State is what every G5 team wants to emulate. Heck, they were even on the cover of the EA NCAA football game a couple years ago.
Will we ever reach that level? I hope so, but I think it will take quite a few years. If we stay at the top of the Sun Belt over that time, win games against top tier G5 teams and a few low to mid tier P5 teams, I can see us getting some National Attention especially if we do well in bowl games.
I couldn't help but take notice when the ASN announcers were talking about our team yesterday that they kept reminding fans that "this is the same team that beat Michigan and won 3 straight Nat'l Championships." Sure those were great things in our history, but this year's team and future teams have nothing to do with those events. Will we ever get past being known as the team who beat Michigan?
Absolutely the commitment is the same but this team stands on its own. It deserves to be respected for their own accomplishments and not the accomplishments of a team from history. That is all I meant by my comment. This team deserves accolades of their own. They need not ride on anyone's coat tails.AppinVA wrote:Our commitment to fielding the best program possible.bcoach wrote:Well I was wondering the same thing. Same team? Different players, different head coach, different AD, different league. Different OC different DC What is the same?S.Lewis15 wrote:I think Boise State is what every G5 team wants to emulate. Heck, they were even on the cover of the EA NCAA football game a couple years ago.
Will we ever reach that level? I hope so, but I think it will take quite a few years. If we stay at the top of the Sun Belt over that time, win games against top tier G5 teams and a few low to mid tier P5 teams, I can see us getting some National Attention especially if we do well in bowl games.
I couldn't help but take notice when the ASN announcers were talking about our team yesterday that they kept reminding fans that "this is the same team that beat Michigan and won 3 straight Nat'l Championships." Sure those were great things in our history, but this year's team and future teams have nothing to do with those events. Will we ever get past being known as the team who beat Michigan?
EastHallApp wrote:MDaniels, when you say App should "copy their path," what are you thinking specifically?
Fair point, and I agree, but the commitment that got us here, the commitment that got a win over Michigan, is the same that has us with one of the 20 best overall (17th, maybe?) win percentages. It's the same commitment that will lead us on to whatever big thing lies ahead. Like the commercial says -- if we were a geico commercial -- "if you're Appalachian State, you win football games (and beat Michigan). It's who you are."bcoach wrote:Absolutely the commitment is the same but this team stands on its own. It deserves to be respected for their own accomplishments and not the accomplishments of a team from history. That is all I meant by my comment. This team deserves accolades of their own. They need not ride on anyone's coat tails.AppinVA wrote:Our commitment to fielding the best program possible.bcoach wrote:Well I was wondering the same thing. Same team? Different players, different head coach, different AD, different league. Different OC different DC What is the same?S.Lewis15 wrote:I think Boise State is what every G5 team wants to emulate. Heck, they were even on the cover of the EA NCAA football game a couple years ago.
Will we ever reach that level? I hope so, but I think it will take quite a few years. If we stay at the top of the Sun Belt over that time, win games against top tier G5 teams and a few low to mid tier P5 teams, I can see us getting some National Attention especially if we do well in bowl games.
I couldn't help but take notice when the ASN announcers were talking about our team yesterday that they kept reminding fans that "this is the same team that beat Michigan and won 3 straight Nat'l Championships." Sure those were great things in our history, but this year's team and future teams have nothing to do with those events. Will we ever get past being known as the team who beat Michigan?
I agree we are getting some great recruits but go take a look at Boise's 2016 commitment list on Rivals and then look at anybody's in the Sun Belt. There is no comparison I am afraid.MDaniels84 wrote:EastHallApp wrote:MDaniels, when you say App should "copy their path," what are you thinking specifically?
I , in no way, shape , or form want App to loosen academic standards in order to find success on the gridiron at the FBS level. Rather, I was speaking to the "play anyone , anywhere, anytime" mantra that we have historically always adhered to. I am well aware that we don't need more than 1 Clemson type of game per season. However, this week I witnessed a lot of growth and who knows, maybe some of it was due to having our backs against the wall after the Clemson game.
I think that we are already recruiting like Boise and other successful G5 programs. Lets just keep it up and continue to utilize our walk on program which has always been an App resource.
Yep, all that stuff is different.bcoach wrote:Well I was wondering the same thing. Same team? Different players, different head coach, different AD, different league. Different OC different DC What is the same?
Where would we get the money to expand the stadium any significant amount? We are practically giving away tickets as it is. 4 for $99 for example.boonetown1 wrote:I think we need to pump the breaks on the whole Boise State thing. First and foremost we need to schedule a game with ECU and beat them. They have done a good job of scheduling mediocre ACC teams and beating them to gain recognition. For example, the VT game yesterday was "impressive", but that VT team (especially the offense) sucks and will be a mid to bottom ACC team. WE ARE COMPETING WITH ECU DIRECTLY FOR RECRUITS AND IT WOULD HELP US TO PLAY THEM.
on a side note, for those not in favor of stadium expansion....see ECU. In the late 90's/early 2000's they expanded and while not always full, it has helped them to get more "big games". Those that say, well ODU/Charlotte have scheduled big games with a small staiudm. They are in a larger market and are playing there for recruiting purposes. ECU is in a similar situation to us, they had to build the facility to get others to come. I'm not saying 50k, just a solid 30k with upgraded facilities (with an option to further enhance, not grow, just enhance in the future). I know people are sick of hearing this, but I truly believe we need to make public a more detailed master plan on stadium expansion for the future (not what was released a couple of years ago).
That rant aside, I fully believe we are headed in the right direction and could gain credibility of top tier G5 teams.
True, but we should be in a position where we didn't have to virtually give away free seats. The CW on here that when we moved up attendance would "automatically" increase dramatically and we would be needing expansion within a couple years. Well we don't except in some people's dreams.AppSt94 wrote:Getting $99.00 for 4 tickets is better than $0.00 and seeing aluminum on TV.