sumler

PBR1893-BEER-HAT-GUY
Posts: 548
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:07 pm
Has thanked: 75 times
Been thanked: 477 times

sumler

Unread post by PBR1893-BEER-HAT-GUY » Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:18 am

i know we're young but any updates on sumler? id really like to see this guys speed on the field.

User avatar
AppState89
Posts: 1653
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:22 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: High Point, NC
Has thanked: 1318 times
Been thanked: 455 times

Re: sumler

Unread post by AppState89 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:21 am

John, not really sure why he didn't play yesterday. I do know his parents say all is ok, don't worry. Just wait and we will see. I trust them.
AppState89 AKA Robert Martin :D :D

User avatar
cbarrier90
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:30 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Contact:

Re: sumler

Unread post by cbarrier90 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:49 am

He's young and still adjusting to the system. Even though he came from Oregon, he is human, and goes through an adjustment period like everyone else. He's only a freshman, so we won't know what we have until a few years from now.

It's also a question of arsenal:

Tony Washington
Andrew Peacock
Sean Price
Malachi Jones
Steven Miller
Rod Chisholm

If you put Sumler on the field, any one of those six has to come off to make space.

An embarassment of riches, I tell you! EMBARASSMENT!

moehler
Posts: 1378
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 12:01 am
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: sumler

Unread post by moehler » Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:58 am

i think he did get in a few plays, still don't know why he isn't atleast on kickoffs, but I agree, it looks like just a numbers thing at this moment.

ELCubano1
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:22 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: sumler

Unread post by ELCubano1 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:06 am

It's a shame that the coaching staff cannot find a place for this type of unique speed.

However, I'm more concerned about our defense at this point. They have shown that they can't defend the triple option (Citadel) and they were picked apart in the passing game by Elon yesterday.

I'm glad to see the win, but they are coming against inferior teams. If we give up this much offense now, what can we expect against better competition?

User avatar
cbarrier90
Posts: 148
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:30 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Boone, NC
Contact:

Re: sumler

Unread post by cbarrier90 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:38 am

ELCubano1 wrote:It's a shame that the coaching staff cannot find a place for this type of unique speed.
Put 35 points up on the board (could have had more) and STILL issues with the offense. The coaching staff just CAN'T catch a break, can they?

With whom do you want them to replace Sumler? He's out there on kickoffs but they keep booting it to Tony who is consistently reaching the 30 and 40 yard lines and has come close to breaking it several times.
ELCubano1 wrote:However, I'm more concerned about our defense at this point. They have shown that they can't defend the triple option (Citadel) and they were picked apart in the passing game by Elon yesterday.
They also forced three interceptions from Wilson but WHO'S COUNTING? By the way, Elon always has a good offense and always puts up points. Aaron Mellette is easily the best WR in the FCS.

What does the inability to defend the triple option have to do with playing defense against Elon and (coming up) Samford? We'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
ELCubano1 wrote:I'm glad to see the win, but they are coming against inferior teams. If we give up this much offense now, what can we expect against better competition?
Whatever happened to just enjoying a good win?

Image

User avatar
YesAppCan
Posts: 5879
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:52 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Greensboro
Has thanked: 1602 times
Been thanked: 568 times

Re: sumler

Unread post by YesAppCan » Sun Oct 07, 2012 12:27 pm

cbarrier90 wrote:
ELCubano1 wrote:It's a shame that the coaching staff cannot find a place for this type of unique speed.
Put 35 points up on the board (could have had more) and STILL issues with the offense. The coaching staff just CAN'T catch a break, can they?

With whom do you want them to replace Sumler? He's out there on kickoffs but they keep booting it to Tony who is consistently reaching the 30 and 40 yard lines and has come close to breaking it several times.
ELCubano1 wrote:However, I'm more concerned about our defense at this point. They have shown that they can't defend the triple option (Citadel) and they were picked apart in the passing game by Elon yesterday.
They also forced three interceptions from Wilson but WHO'S COUNTING? By the way, Elon always has a good offense and always puts up points. Aaron Mellette is easily the best WR in the FCS.

What does the inability to defend the triple option have to do with playing defense against Elon and (coming up) Samford? We'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
ELCubano1 wrote:I'm glad to see the win, but they are coming against inferior teams. If we give up this much offense now, what can we expect against better competition?
Whatever happened to just enjoying a good win?Image
Nothing. I enjoyed and cheered on my Mountaineers as I have for 30+ years. Hoarse today because of it. However, there is NOTHING wrong with folks pointing out things that have to be fixed/worked on/corrected in the future in order for Appalachian to continue to have success in the next five games. I will bet you my house that the coaches, though thrilled with the win yesterday, will head into Monday's practice with a list of things that have to be corrected and/or worked on and will spend more time pointing out to players where mistakes were made yesterday.

ELCubano1
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:22 am
School: Appalachian State
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: sumler

Unread post by ELCubano1 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:55 pm

Exactly my point. Although the win was nice, the coaching staff WILL definitely sit the players down on Monday and work on the things they need to improve on.

What does not defending the triple option have to do with Elon? That's not the point. The point here is they can't defend the run any better than defending the pass.

I acknowledge the 3 interceptions, but you simply cannot give up 500 and 600 plus yards of offense and expect to win against the better teams. I don't think that Coach Moore's objective was to beat Elon and be happy with the entire season.

My comment was simply acknowledging that we're giving up too much offense and we need still need to improve and play better to have a successful SEASON! I believe Coach Moore will address these issues instead of staying satisfied and complacent. Addressing weaknesses is the only way to improve!

User avatar
hapapp
Posts: 16980
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 12:48 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Rocky Mount, VA
Has thanked: 2691 times
Been thanked: 3114 times

Re: sumler

Unread post by hapapp » Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:08 pm

I don't think we have a problem with our secondary. I think the problem rests with the defensive line. While we did record a season high 4 sacks yesterday, for way too much of the game we put little to no pressure on Wilson. When a QB has that much time he can pick any secondary apart.

huskie3
Posts: 4601
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2000 9:57 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Gaston County
Has thanked: 690 times
Been thanked: 657 times

Re: sumler

Unread post by huskie3 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:10 pm

I think the problem rests with the defensive line.

I have a strong dislike for zone coverage, I think it confuses the defenders more than the offense. I would rather see man coverage and the LBers free to blitz and help with the run.
Bring Your A Game!

Black Saturday
Posts: 10692
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 11:22 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1018 times
Been thanked: 1177 times

Re: sumler

Unread post by Black Saturday » Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:42 pm

Yesterday I watched Wilson have the same type of game that Scott Riddle have two years ago in Boone. Deja vu, two years ago for whatever reason Dale Jones decided to not pressure Riddle all day and he ate us alive. It took about a quarter for DJ to realize we needed to get pressure with the some backers to disrupt the fun day that Wilson was having. If we didn't disrupt Wilson once and a while, Mellette would have had 300 yards receiving, he did have a career day against us anyway. Thanks for the adjustments DJ which had much to do with our win.

Along with that, their coach is an idiot for his two field goal attempts because our D had not stopped them any, he gave up a high probability of 2 tds, imo. Completely changed the complexion of the game. Thanks Coach Swepson. :lol:

agree our defensive line is young, but no reason they shouldn't get better and stronger, but it's not going to be this year.

agree we all want to see Sumler and what 4.2 speed looks like. My suggestion is pitch him the ball on the end around plays and try to make blocks for him to outrun the D to the edge.
BLACK SATURDAY

Yosef84
Posts: 3815
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:27 am
Has thanked: 1368 times
Been thanked: 2152 times

Re: sumler

Unread post by Yosef84 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:08 pm

ELCubano1 wrote:It's a shame that the coaching staff cannot find a place for this type of unique speed.

However, I'm more concerned about our defense at this point. They have shown that they can't defend the triple option (Citadel) and they were picked apart in the passing game by Elon yesterday.

I'm glad to see the win, but they are coming against inferior teams. If we give up this much offense now, what can we expect against better competition?
I was concerned about the Defense to some degree, but the truth is that the "inferior" team that we beat yesterday came very close to beating Georgia Southern. The D stiffened up as the game progressed and held on until the Offense ignited. None of these games are "givens" and we need to appreciate a good win against a decent team who was HIGHLY motivated to beat us. Citadel exploited a weakness in our D on a week when the team simply did not click. Yes, I'm concerned about GSU and Wofford, but I think we're getting better with each game.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”