Page 1 of 1

WSJ article

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 4:19 am
by appst89

Re: WSJ article

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 5:09 am
by hapapp
I thought Dada graduated early.

Re: WSJ article

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 5:22 am
by T-Dog
Offensively, the Mountaineers return third-year starting quarterback Taylor Lamb, each of their top four running backs, led by senior Marcus Adams, and four players who started at least six games along the offensive line last season.
I will help Bret move from Fayeteville today.

Re: WSJ article

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 5:58 am
by Rekdiver
T-Dog wrote:
Offensively, the Mountaineers return third-year starting quarterback Taylor Lamb, each of their top four running backs, led by senior Marcus Adams, and four players who started at least six games along the offensive line last season.
I will help Bret move from Fayeteville today.
I was wondering when Marcus Adams was going to move up the depth chart! Excellent news.....Big league!

Re: WSJ article

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:09 am
by Yosef84
Sounds like they've thrown a more varied playbook at them during the camp. That is a very positive sign. Maybe our offense won't be quite as vanilla as we've been early in the season recently with the younger teams we've had. Things seem to be shaping up very positively. I'm pumped about this year!

Re: WSJ article

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 8:35 am
by EastHallApp
Yosef84 wrote:Sounds like they've thrown a more varied playbook at them during the camp. That is a very positive sign. Maybe our offense won't be quite as vanilla as we've been early in the season recently with the younger teams we've had. Things seem to be shaping up very positively. I'm pumped about this year!
Note that comment was in reference to the defense. Satt has mentioned in a couple of the practice reports that the offense is still pretty basic.

Re: WSJ article

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:28 am
by CornCobPipes
hapapp wrote:I thought Dada graduated early.

Yes......this writer definitely needs to get up to speed.......Dada no longer on roster along with Marcus Cox mistake.

Batting 0 for 1

Re: WSJ article

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:29 am
by Yosef84
EastHallApp wrote:
Yosef84 wrote:Sounds like they've thrown a more varied playbook at them during the camp. That is a very positive sign. Maybe our offense won't be quite as vanilla as we've been early in the season recently with the younger teams we've had. Things seem to be shaping up very positively. I'm pumped about this year!
Note that comment was in reference to the defense. Satt has mentioned in a couple of the practice reports that the offense is still pretty basic.
Ah, good point. I let my wishful thinking influence my reading. That said, we've been a little slow to release the defensive dogs also, so a good aggressive defense goes a long way to getting the positive field position that will help on the other side of the ball. Yes I know. I'm a total homer.