Nate Woody

User avatar
appst89
Site Admin
Posts: 10148
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 411 times
Been thanked: 2636 times

Re: Nate Woody

Unread post by appst89 » Sun Jan 05, 2020 7:13 pm

NewApp wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:55 pm
appstatealum wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:51 pm
NewApp wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:07 pm
appstatealum wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 3:16 pm
APPdiesel wrote:
Sat Jan 04, 2020 11:14 am
I've seen about 10 posters over the last 6 months claiming that Nate wasn't well liked or isn't welcome back but nobody knows why or can give specific reasons. Sounds like a lot of hearsay until examples are given.
I’ll PM you...

If it's worth sharing in private, let us all read it, verify and critique it.
You've been on here long enough to know what the story is. The reason I PMed him was because Diesel was legitimately claiming to have missed it before when it has been said.
Out of 10,000 posts, I don't recall the few that must have been about him. Sorry. Still doesn't excuse it from being private.
I'm sorry, but nobody has any obligation to share anything publicly.

User avatar
appst89
Site Admin
Posts: 10148
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 411 times
Been thanked: 2636 times

Re: Nate Woody

Unread post by appst89 » Sun Jan 05, 2020 7:15 pm

AppDub wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 6:02 pm
Can anyone get access to the Lodge? I've emailed the moderator but not response.
Never received an e-mail from you. I'll send you a PM.

NewApp
Posts: 7799
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1018 times
Been thanked: 949 times
Contact:

Re: Nate Woody

Unread post by NewApp » Sun Jan 05, 2020 9:46 pm

appst89 wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 7:13 pm
NewApp wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:55 pm
appstatealum wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:51 pm
NewApp wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:07 pm
appstatealum wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 3:16 pm


I’ll PM you...

If it's worth sharing in private, let us all read it, verify and critique it.
You've been on here long enough to know what the story is. The reason I PMed him was because Diesel was legitimately claiming to have missed it before when it has been said.
Out of 10,000 posts, I don't recall the few that must have been about him. Sorry. Still doesn't excuse it from being private.
I'm sorry, but nobody has any obligation to share anything publicly.
Didn’t in any way shape nor form say they that they did but public criticisms of individuals should be open to public scrutiny. Fair and balanced..that’s all otherwise these attacks could be deemed biased and spurilous.
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX

User avatar
appst89
Site Admin
Posts: 10148
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 411 times
Been thanked: 2636 times

Re: Nate Woody

Unread post by appst89 » Mon Jan 06, 2020 4:35 am

NewApp wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 9:46 pm
appst89 wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 7:13 pm
NewApp wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:55 pm
appstatealum wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:51 pm
NewApp wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:07 pm



If it's worth sharing in private, let us all read it, verify and critique it.
You've been on here long enough to know what the story is. The reason I PMed him was because Diesel was legitimately claiming to have missed it before when it has been said.
Out of 10,000 posts, I don't recall the few that must have been about him. Sorry. Still doesn't excuse it from being private.
I'm sorry, but nobody has any obligation to share anything publicly.
Didn’t in any way shape nor form say they that they did but public criticisms of individuals should be open to public scrutiny. Fair and balanced..that’s all otherwise these attacks could be deemed biased and spurilous.
"Still doesn't excuse it from being private." That seems to be saying it in every way shape and form. And you're going to have to show me where anyone was attacked.

bigdaddyg
Posts: 5832
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:08 pm
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 2474 times

Re: Nate Woody

Unread post by bigdaddyg » Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:19 am

I wondered why a thread about a former coach who isn’t returning has now reached two pages. Scrolling up I now see- another pissing match with NewApp. Wonderful

WataugaMan
Posts: 3975
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:17 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1408 times
Been thanked: 1083 times

Re: Nate Woody

Unread post by WataugaMan » Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:25 am

Therefore, Nuck Foody.

Yosef84
Posts: 3831
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:27 am
Has thanked: 1383 times
Been thanked: 2172 times

Re: Nate Woody

Unread post by Yosef84 » Mon Jan 06, 2020 7:49 am

NewApp wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:03 pm
ah59396 wrote:
Sat Jan 04, 2020 1:09 pm
App State is becoming the cradle of coaching. I love it. Gives us a ton of options down the road if necessary because there will be tons of “App guys” with tons of experience.

Also makes App an exceptionally appealing place to land for up and coming OC’s/DC’s and position coaches.
Our #1 homegrown App guy left for more money and greater prestige/
limelight, remember?
All that did was open the door for a new #1 homegrown App guy. We don't share the same opinion about Satterfield in that I still consider him a Mountaineer. He did right by us for the years he was here and I wish him well in his future. Now we have Shawn Clark. That's how things work and the future looks bright!

GO APPS!!!

NewApp
Posts: 7799
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
School: Appalachian State
Has thanked: 1018 times
Been thanked: 949 times
Contact:

Re: Nate Woody

Unread post by NewApp » Mon Jan 06, 2020 8:13 am

appst89 wrote:
Mon Jan 06, 2020 4:35 am
NewApp wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 9:46 pm
appst89 wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 7:13 pm
NewApp wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:55 pm
appstatealum wrote:
Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:51 pm

You've been on here long enough to know what the story is. The reason I PMed him was because Diesel was legitimately claiming to have missed it before when it has been said.
Out of 10,000 posts, I don't recall the few that must have been about him. Sorry. Still doesn't excuse it from being private.
I'm sorry, but nobody has any obligation to share anything publicly.
Didn’t in any way shape nor form say they that they did but public criticisms of individuals should be open to public scrutiny. Fair and balanced..that’s all otherwise these attacks could be deemed biased and spurilous.
"Still doesn't excuse it from being private." That seems to be saying it in every way shape and form. And you're going to have to show me where anyone was attacked.
Obviously i used too harsh of words, but saying “everything wasn’t golden when he was here” sure insinuates negative vibes and immeiately going private sure adds questions to the insinuations.
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”