• Quick leads Rams in receiving

Posted: **Sun Sep 07, 2014 4:15 pm**

Had 70 at the half and led the team with 99 yards. I'm feeling a breakout season for him.

Posted: **Sun Sep 07, 2014 4:17 pm**

Getting 99 yards. That would've killed me in my old fantasy league. It didn't pay off until 100.

Posted: **Sun Sep 07, 2014 4:21 pm**

AppinVA wrote:Getting 99 yards. That would've killed me in my old fantasy league. It didn't pay off until 100.

PPR or don't do fantasy at all

Posted: **Sun Sep 07, 2014 4:29 pm**

mtnjax wrote:
AppinVA wrote:Getting 99 yards. That would've killed me in my old fantasy league. It didn't pay off until 100.
PPR or don't do fantasy at all

That league predated easy computer access. We kept it going until a few years ago. PPR is better nowadays.

Posted: **Sun Sep 07, 2014 4:39 pm**

So Cadet was the RB for the Saints first offensive play of the game today. Does that make him the starter?

Posted: **Sun Sep 07, 2014 5:06 pm**

AppSt94 wrote:So Cadet was the RB for the Saints first offensive play of the game today. Does that make him the starter?

He didn't have any carries, caught one pass, and had one 34 yard kick return. I don't think he is the starter.

Posted: **Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:08 pm**

hapapp wrote:
AppSt94 wrote:So Cadet was the RB for the Saints first offensive play of the game today. Does that make him the starter?
He didn't have any carries, caught one pass, and had one 34 yard kick return. I don't think he is the starter.

It was a joke man.

Posted: **Sun Sep 07, 2014 8:32 pm**

AppSt94 wrote:
hapapp wrote:
AppSt94 wrote:So Cadet was the RB for the Saints first offensive play of the game today. Does that make him the starter?
He didn't have any carries, caught one pass, and had one 34 yard kick return. I don't think he is the starter.
It was a joke man.

Hence the wink.

Posted: **Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:38 am**

Sorry. I don't speak emodocon goodly.

Posted: **Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:31 am**

AppSt94 wrote:Sorry. I don't speak emodocon goodly.

Posted: **Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:20 am**

hapapp wrote:
AppSt94 wrote:Sorry. I don't speak emodocon goodly.

Translation...
Very Happy

Quick leads Rams in receiving

Quick leads Rams in receiving

Re: Quick leads Rams in receiving

Re: Quick leads Rams in receiving

Re: Quick leads Rams in receiving

Re: Quick leads Rams in receiving

Re: Quick leads Rams in receiving

Re: Quick leads Rams in receiving

Re: Quick leads Rams in receiving

Re: Quick leads Rams in receiving

Re: Quick leads Rams in receiving

Re: Quick leads Rams in receiving