I may be and there's certainly a chance there's more technicality and nuance to a coin toss than I understand, but, you win the coin toss and you can make sure you are on the receiving end of the initial kick off. Right?WVAPPeer wrote:Just so I understand you correctly - You are saying App won the toss and "elected" to kick? - If that's what you are saying you are wrong - In that scenario then Elon would have had the choice to begin the 2nd half and they would not have chosen to kick off but to receive - I truly believe you are mistaken ---CVAPP wrote:Nope, not unless my ears are failing me. They do broadcast the coin toss.
To Kick Rather Than To Receive
-
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:45 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Catawba Valley
- Has thanked: 717 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
Last edited by CVAPP on Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 13552
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2000 9:41 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3079 times
- Been thanked: 2874 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
I wouldn't want Elon to have scored with no time (or little time) left in the half, and then give them the ball to start the third quarter. I've seen 14-0 leads evaporate to become 14-14 ties in under a "minute" on the game clock, without a true "change" of possession, or mistake made.CVAPP wrote:My point being there's nothing wrong with opening the flood gates on an opponent from the get go. We gave Elon a chance to gain confidence. No need for that.Black Saturday wrote:Sorry I wasn't clear but that was my foresight thought at the end of the first half. However, it didn't turn out like I had hoped. I actually thought we'd open the floodgates on them in the second half.CVAPP wrote:Hindsight is always 20/20. BTW, if I recall correctly, we went 3 and out on our first possession in the 3rd.Black Saturday wrote:The way of the momentum and flow of the game was going, I was glad to be getting the ball to begin the second half.
"Some people call me hillbilly. Some people call me mountain man. You can call me Appalachian. Appalachian's what I am."-- Del McCoury Band
-
- Posts: 9991
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 6603 times
- Been thanked: 4149 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
You are correct, we did win the toss, however, I beleive that JJ told the referee that we will defer. The video/audio is not on the archive yet so until then, we can't listen. Iirc, Randy Jackson begins to comment at the time and makes it difficult to hear the ref.CVAPP wrote:Wrong, we won the toss and elected to kick the ball.AppSt94 wrote:We deferred, not chose to kickoff. The difference being that by allowing Elon to choose to kick or receive, we pick which end to defend. Another reason for deferring is to seize momentum. If the deferring team scores just before the half, they will then retain the ball to start the 2nd half. This thought process potentially allows for a 14 point swing,
- firemoose
- Posts: 8074
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:20 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Boone, NC
- Has thanked: 868 times
- Been thanked: 3740 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
Sorry CVAPP but you might need to get those ears checked. We won the toss and deferred. JJ said defer and Randy J confirmed it.CVAPP wrote:Nope, not unless my ears are failing me. They do broadcast the coin toss.
-
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:45 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Catawba Valley
- Has thanked: 717 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
You either want the ball or you don't. I still don't understand how this is complicated when you win the toss.AppSt94 wrote:You are correct, we did win the toss, however, I beleive that JJ told the referee that we will defer. The video/audio is not on the archive yet so until then, we can't listen. Iirc, Randy Jackson begins to comment at the time and makes it difficult to hear the ref.CVAPP wrote:Wrong, we won the toss and elected to kick the ball.AppSt94 wrote:We deferred, not chose to kickoff. The difference being that by allowing Elon to choose to kick or receive, we pick which end to defend. Another reason for deferring is to seize momentum. If the deferring team scores just before the half, they will then retain the ball to start the 2nd half. This thought process potentially allows for a 14 point swing,
- appst89
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9940
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 346 times
- Been thanked: 2226 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
It is common practice, especially in college, for the team winning the coin toss to defer their choice to the second half. If the team winning the toss elects to kick, then the opponent will get the opening kickoff as well as the second half kickoff. If the team winning the toss elects to defer, as we did on Saturday, then the opponent will receive the opening kickoff and the team winning the toss will receive the second half kickoff.
- AppStateNews
- Posts: 2736
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:36 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 220 times
- Been thanked: 2289 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
By deferring, its a de facto choice to kick the ball..CVAPP wrote: You either want the ball or you don't. I still don't understand how this is complicated when you win the toss.
The rule is, if you chose what you want to do on the opening kick off, then the other team gets to choose what they want to do to start the second half.
So, if we chose the kick instead of deferring, then Elon would have got the choice to kick or receive in the second half and obviously, would choose the receive.
tAPPedInSports.net
Not affiliated with the above website
Not affiliated with the above website
-
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:45 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Catawba Valley
- Has thanked: 717 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
Thank you for that explanation. Now, are you a fan of deferring?appst89 wrote:It is common practice, especially in college, for the team winning the coin toss to defer their choice to the second half. If the team winning the toss elects to kick, then the opponent will get the opening kickoff as well as the second half kickoff. If the team winning the toss elects to defer, as we did on Saturday, then the opponent will receive the opening kickoff and the team winning the toss will receive the second half kickoff.
- appst89
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9940
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 346 times
- Been thanked: 2226 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
It depends on the team. If we had a team with a dominating defense, then yes, I would favor deferring to let the defense set the tone. With the team we have this year, I am not a fan of deferring. I'd rather have the offense set the tone.CVAPP wrote:Thank you for that explanation. Now, are you a fan of deferring?appst89 wrote:It is common practice, especially in college, for the team winning the coin toss to defer their choice to the second half. If the team winning the toss elects to kick, then the opponent will get the opening kickoff as well as the second half kickoff. If the team winning the toss elects to defer, as we did on Saturday, then the opponent will receive the opening kickoff and the team winning the toss will receive the second half kickoff.
-
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:45 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Catawba Valley
- Has thanked: 717 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
So we agree, weather permitting.appst89 wrote:It depends on the team. If we had a team with a dominating defense, then yes, I would favor deferring to let the defense set the tone. With the team we have this year, I am not a fan of deferring. I'd rather have the offense set the tone.CVAPP wrote:Thank you for that explanation. Now, are you a fan of deferring?appst89 wrote:It is common practice, especially in college, for the team winning the coin toss to defer their choice to the second half. If the team winning the toss elects to kick, then the opponent will get the opening kickoff as well as the second half kickoff. If the team winning the toss elects to defer, as we did on Saturday, then the opponent will receive the opening kickoff and the team winning the toss will receive the second half kickoff.
- appst89
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9940
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 346 times
- Been thanked: 2226 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
Yeah, we agree, but I can't remember the last time we won a toss and didn't defer.
- WVAPPeer
- Posts: 12311
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:14 am
- School: Other
- Location: Born: Almost Heaven
- Has thanked: 4678 times
- Been thanked: 2553 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
This is the 4th time I have tried to post - don't know why it keeps disappearing -
If Team A wins the toss they have 4 options -
1. to receive
2. to defend a goal
3. to kickoff
4. to defer
If Team A Chooses option 1,2, or 3 then Team B gets its choice of the one or two remaining options and also gets to choose from option 1,2 or 3 to begin the 2nd half ---
However, if Team A DEFERS, then Team B gets to choose from options 1, 2 or 3 and all the steps above are reversed ---
If Team A wins the toss they have 4 options -
1. to receive
2. to defend a goal
3. to kickoff
4. to defer
If Team A Chooses option 1,2, or 3 then Team B gets its choice of the one or two remaining options and also gets to choose from option 1,2 or 3 to begin the 2nd half ---
However, if Team A DEFERS, then Team B gets to choose from options 1, 2 or 3 and all the steps above are reversed ---
"Montani Semper Liberi"
The Dude Abides!!!
The Dude Abides!!!
-
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:45 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Catawba Valley
- Has thanked: 717 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
That's among the reasons I thought this worthy of discussion. I seem to remember we seldomed deferred on a won coin toss back in the dynasty days.
- appst89
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9940
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 346 times
- Been thanked: 2226 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
My memory may be off, but I don't recall us ever taking the ball when we won the toss.CVAPP wrote:That's among the reasons I thought this worthy of discussion. I seem to remember we seldomed deferred on a won coin toss back in the dynasty days.
-
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:45 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Catawba Valley
- Has thanked: 717 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
I can remember fondly hearing our captain(s) say "we want the ball".appst89 wrote:My memory may be off, but I don't recall us ever taking the ball when we won the toss.CVAPP wrote:That's among the reasons I thought this worthy of discussion. I seem to remember we seldomed deferred on a won coin toss back in the dynasty days.
- WVAPPeer
- Posts: 12311
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:14 am
- School: Other
- Location: Born: Almost Heaven
- Has thanked: 4678 times
- Been thanked: 2553 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
sorry I could be wrong on this as well however when AE was clicking I think we almost always took the ball first ---appst89 wrote:My memory may be off, but I don't recall us ever taking the ball when we won the toss.CVAPP wrote:That's among the reasons I thought this worthy of discussion. I seem to remember we seldomed deferred on a won coin toss back in the dynasty days.
"Montani Semper Liberi"
The Dude Abides!!!
The Dude Abides!!!
-
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:10 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Duluth, GA
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 651 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
Personally, I'd rather have the ball to start the second half. If you defer and the other team scores on their first possession, you still have the whole game to recover.
-
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:45 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Catawba Valley
- Has thanked: 717 times
- Been thanked: 307 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
Yep. You set your own tone.AppinATL wrote:Personally, I'd rather have the ball to start the second half. If you defer and the other team scores on their first possession, you still have the whole game to recover.
-
- Posts: 1316
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:10 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Duluth, GA
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 651 times
Re: To Kick Rather Than To Receive
WVAPPeer wrote:sorry I could be wrong on this as well however when AE was clicking I think we almost always took the ball first ---appst89 wrote:My memory may be off, but I don't recall us ever taking the ball when we won the toss.CVAPP wrote:That's among the reasons I thought this worthy of discussion. I seem to remember we seldomed deferred on a won coin toss back in the dynasty days.
I believe you are correct. Those teams were about as unstoppable as any football team I've ever seen. We would score in about a minute and a half frequently. Early and often! When you have a machine like that, then yes, go ahead and take the opening kickoff and punch the opponent right in the mouth right away and let them know just what they've gotten themselves in to.
- T-Dog
- Posts: 6622
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: Boone, NC
- Has thanked: 206 times
- Been thanked: 2631 times