Best point yet ---Saint3333 wrote:I was more concerned being stuck in the SoCon than I am with the SBC.

Best point yet ---Saint3333 wrote:I was more concerned being stuck in the SoCon than I am with the SBC.
I see your points and all of us know everything is connected to $$$ - But again if you look at most of the top teams in the FCS they are still non-privates --- ND State, Montana, Montana St, No Iowa, UNH, Coastal, Ill St, E KY, Delaware, Chatty, Youngstown, So Ill, Jax St, McNeese St., etc. --- Will these teams allow themselves to be "taken over" by the Richmonds, W&Ms, Furmans, Woffords? - I don't see that because the Public Schools rule the football --- Interesting dynamics and I think it will be interesting to see how this all plays out but at Saint alludes - Not our problem ---Rick0714 wrote:From everyone I have spoken to, the problem in FCS has nothing to do with competition on the FCS level. It's still relevant. It is, as we have all said, about the $. Not just losing the money games,but that is a big factor. The point is this, the FCS, aside from a few schools, has very few outside sources of funds (namely TV and advertising income). I see the FCS becoming a landscape dominated by small private schools where funds are not scarce. As the P5 grows, the G5 will get the more of what's left. Then of course, there is the rising costs. As I and others have stated, there will have to be changes made to account for those costs and football programs that are barely breaking even on average, are dead in the crosshairs. I love the playoffs, but as someone stated, they do lose money. DII has seen its share of programs joining their ranks to save costs from FCS (WSSU). I loved FCS football, but I think we made the only decision that was feasible. I hope it survives and thrives,but the outlook is dim.appbio91 wrote:This is one of the areas I still disagree with the FBS or nothing crowd. The FCS top 25 landscape looks the same as it has in recent memory ( minus App and GaSo). This is still very relevant football to the respective fan bases. The SoCon is less relevant for sure but as a whole I see nothing to suggest FCS is a wasteland.WVAPPeer wrote:Another question I have is --- Why do some of you guys feel that FCS is in trouble? - I am not questioning anyone's opinion just asking what is driving your opinion? It seems that there is more parity in FCS and several conferences (certainly not the SoCon) are much stronger ---
To keep this from getting jacked into a FBS vs FCS dscussion, there is no question in my mind we did the right thing.
FWIW, the College of William and Mary is public, you know.WVAPPeer wrote:Rick0714 wrote:I see your points and all of us know everything is connected to $$$ - But again if you look at most of the top teams in the FCS they are still non-privates --- ND State, Montana, Montana St, No Iowa, UNH, Coastal, Ill St, E KY, Delaware, Chatty, Youngstown, So Ill, Jax St, McNeese St., etc. --- Will these teams allow themselves to be "taken over" by the Richmonds, W&Ms, Furmans, Woffords? - I don't see that because the Public Schools rule the football --- Interesting dynamics and I think it will be interesting to see how this all plays out but at Saint alludes - Not our problem ---appbio91 wrote:This is one of the areas I still disagree with the FBS or nothing crowd. The FCS top 25 landscape looks the same as it has in recent memory ( minus App and GaSo). This is still very relevant football to the respective fan bases. The SoCon is less relevant for sure but as a whole I see nothing to suggest FCS is a wasteland.WVAPPeer wrote:Another question I have is --- Why do some of you guys feel that FCS is in trouble? - I am not questioning anyone's opinion just asking what is driving your opinion? It seems that there is more parity in FCS and several conferences (certainly not the SoCon) are much stronger ---
To keep this from getting jacked into a FBS vs FCS dscussion, there is no question in my mind we did the right thing.[/quote
From everyone I have spoken to, the problem in FCS has nothing to do with competition on the FCS level. It's still relevant. It is, as we have all said, about the $. Not just losing the money games,but that is a big factor. The point is this, the FCS, aside from a few schools, has very few outside sources of funds (namely TV and advertising income). I see the FCS becoming a landscape dominated by small private schools where funds are not scarce. As the P5 grows, the G5 will get the more of what's left. Then of course, there is the rising costs. As I and others have stated, there will have to be changes made to account for those costs and football programs that are barely breaking even on average, are dead in the crosshairs. I love the playoffs, but as someone stated, they do lose money. DII has seen its share of programs joining their ranks to save costs from FCS (WSSU). I loved FCS football, but I think we made the only decision that was feasible. I hope it survives and thrives,but the outlook is dim.
Only way a move happens in the near future is if the G5 conferences collectively decide that the only way to make ends meet is to align geographically. I don't see conferences or schools setting egos aside easily, so I'm not banking on it. I'm assuming App is in the SBC for a long duration even if the SBC doesn't look the same during that time.diehardapp18 wrote:don't see us leaving for awhile. i feel like we're in a good spot right now. with ecu no longer in the cusa i don't get the appeal of that conference, and i doubt they're looking to expand anytime soon anyways. can't think of a move off the top of my head i could see happening anytime soon.