There’s also a group who for some reason doesn’t believe the AAC will make as much as they are slated to make in 2021 fromNavyApp wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 6:26 pmhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatod ... p/39229011AppSt94 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 6:11 pmWhere are you getting that $6 million figure from?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 4:01 pmThat was said somewhat flippantly, but it is a budget of about $25M - you’d have about $6M/year extra from TV revenue. I think there’s a way to make $30M work for you, call me crazy./\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 3:09 pmFigure out a budget as you go along? App State printing money like the Federal Reserve?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:32 pm
You’re sure Gillin would accept? There are those out there who think it’s a no go due to budget concerns, which i don’t necessarily disagree with. I just think it’s something you do and figure it out as you go along. I’m in the camp of I think we could compete now in the AAC even at our current budget. I guess the concern is the other sports, which to be frank I’m not as concerned about. We know what drives the bus.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the contracts have not been signed, said the deal will provide the conference with about $83.3 million per year, with each member school receiving an average of just under $7 million a year.
Article was written in 2019
TV alone and believe the financial gain in moving from SBC to AAC is negligible. Argue all you want about if App can compete in the AAC with its current budget, though following that logic means you think basically the entire AAC is better than App as it stands today (they’re not), but I can’t help but not take you serious if you don’t think it’s a significant financial advantage to be in the AAC vs SBC.