Re: 12 team playoff? All P5 conference champs to be in, 1 G5 Champ, six at large
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 6:44 am
http://www.yosefscabin.com/forum/
I see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
I mean of course the AAC would be awesome...for football. But the likelihood in this moment right now of a football only offer coming our way from the AAC is the exact same as a huge conference realignment. ZERO. Let's not kid ourselves, that invite is not coming anytime soon, no matter how many of us want it or don't want it. So why not have more than one pipedream? None of it will happen so why not have some fun and flesh out some other ideas, it is a message board after all.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
All of their fans are right about what they have going for them but UAB is the best shot of that group. JMU won't get to skip everyone and go straight to AAC from the FCS and Ga State is not good enough at football. I'm sure the AAC saw what happened to C-USA for just going after TV markets and how that has set them back on the field.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
I guess my point is there are very clearly some do not think it would be awesome. Which i don’t understand. I also wouldn’t say ZERO, probably not much more but not sure i agree with ZERO. But yep we’re in agreement, talking about it is what message boards are for.NavyApp wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:28 amI mean of course the AAC would be awesome...for football. But the likelihood in this moment right now of a football only offer coming our way from the AAC is the exact same as a huge conference realignment. ZERO. Let's not kid ourselves, that invite is not coming anytime soon, no matter how many of us want it or don't want it. So why not have more than one pipedream? None of it will happen so why not have some fun and flesh out some other ideas, it is a message board after all.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
I guess I just don't pay enough attention to the comments by people who are anti AAC lol.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 11:23 amI guess my point is there are very clearly some do not think it would be awesome. Which i don’t understand. I also wouldn’t say ZERO, probably not much more but not sure i agree with ZERO. But yep we’re in agreement, talking about it is what message boards are for.NavyApp wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:28 amI mean of course the AAC would be awesome...for football. But the likelihood in this moment right now of a football only offer coming our way from the AAC is the exact same as a huge conference realignment. ZERO. Let's not kid ourselves, that invite is not coming anytime soon, no matter how many of us want it or don't want it. So why not have more than one pipedream? None of it will happen so why not have some fun and flesh out some other ideas, it is a message board after all.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
There has to be a realistic plan in place in order to set joining the AAC as a goal. Sure the television deal is lucrative, but how many of those schools post pandemic will now want to split that with another school? Isn't the television deal for more than just football? Would the AAC want App State, realistically? I'd think we're not even top 3 for their consideration. If you or anyone could set forth a proposal that would win the hearts of the AAC and have them calling D.G. today, then by all means. Some people such as myself, while having desires to be larger than the Sun Belt, are prepared to embrace the reality that has been created by the P5 conferences and committee.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
App getting into the AAC requires 2 things (from an athletic perspective):/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 1:22 pmThere has to be a realistic plan in place in order to set joining the AAC as a goal. Sure the television deal is lucrative, but how many of those schools post pandemic will now want to split that with another school? Isn't the television deal for more than just football? Would the AAC want App State, realistically? I'd think we're not even top 3 for their consideration. If you or anyone could set forth a proposal that would win the hearts of the AAC and have them calling D.G. today, then by all means. Some people such as myself, while having desires to be larger than the Sun Belt, are prepared to embrace the reality that has been created by the P5 conferences and committee.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
Don’t forget the appreciable increase to our overall athletic budget needed to get to the bottom tier of AAC members.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:03 pmApp getting into the AAC requires 2 things (from an athletic perspective):/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 1:22 pmThere has to be a realistic plan in place in order to set joining the AAC as a goal. Sure the television deal is lucrative, but how many of those schools post pandemic will now want to split that with another school? Isn't the television deal for more than just football? Would the AAC want App State, realistically? I'd think we're not even top 3 for their consideration. If you or anyone could set forth a proposal that would win the hearts of the AAC and have them calling D.G. today, then by all means. Some people such as myself, while having desires to be larger than the Sun Belt, are prepared to embrace the reality that has been created by the P5 conferences and committee.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
1. consistent top 25 rankings for the next 5-7 years. multiple NY6 invites, at least one win, and importantly "stealing" one from a deserving AAC team.
2. Continuous improvement in M/W basketball. We don't have to be world beaters, but they have to be respectable.
3. All other sports have zero bearing on conference affiliation
From an academic perspective, even though we are a very well respected institution, our lack of Phd programs might keep us out regardless of academic success.
from a football competitiveness standpoint, we're already there
I know we could be competitive in the AAC. Does that mean 6-8 wins, making a bowl game, and having a close game or two with the top teams....or does it mean we're fighting for a conference title spot each year? I agree with your first point..we still have something to prove in the rankings on a consistent basis. AAC doesn't want someone who they feel would join just to finish middle of the standings. 5-7 years of continued success in basketball as well as rankings for football...but who knows what the AAC looks like at that point.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:03 pmApp getting into the AAC requires 2 things (from an athletic perspective):/\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 1:22 pmThere has to be a realistic plan in place in order to set joining the AAC as a goal. Sure the television deal is lucrative, but how many of those schools post pandemic will now want to split that with another school? Isn't the television deal for more than just football? Would the AAC want App State, realistically? I'd think we're not even top 3 for their consideration. If you or anyone could set forth a proposal that would win the hearts of the AAC and have them calling D.G. today, then by all means. Some people such as myself, while having desires to be larger than the Sun Belt, are prepared to embrace the reality that has been created by the P5 conferences and committee.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
1. consistent top 25 rankings for the next 5-7 years. multiple NY6 invites, at least one win, and importantly "stealing" one from a deserving AAC team.
2. Continuous improvement in M/W basketball. We don't have to be world beaters, but they have to be respectable.
3. All other sports have zero bearing on conference affiliation
From an academic perspective, even though we are a very well respected institution, our lack of Phd programs might keep us out regardless of academic success.
from a football competitiveness standpoint, we're already there
You’re sure Gillin would accept? There are those out there who think it’s a no go due to budget concerns, which i don’t necessarily disagree with. I just think it’s something you do and figure it out as you go along. I’m in the camp of I think we could compete now in the AAC even at our current budget. I guess the concern is the other sports, which to be frank I’m not as concerned about. We know what drives the bus.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:40 amAll of their fans are right about what they have going for them but UAB is the best shot of that group. JMU won't get to skip everyone and go straight to AAC from the FCS and Ga State is not good enough at football. I'm sure the AAC saw what happened to C-USA for just going after TV markets and how that has set them back on the field.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
AAC definitely does not want anyone else at the moment but if they invite us we should jump for sure. The good news is that Gillin and those with a say would accept the invite so I'm glad they are in charge. Like you said, a regional conference would only set us back.
I wonder if the same people who don't think we should go to the AAC are the ones who warned that moving FBS would be a mistake?
Figure out a budget as you go along? App State printing money like the Federal Reserve?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:32 pmYou’re sure Gillin would accept? There are those out there who think it’s a no go due to budget concerns, which i don’t necessarily disagree with. I just think it’s something you do and figure it out as you go along. I’m in the camp of I think we could compete now in the AAC even at our current budget. I guess the concern is the other sports, which to be frank I’m not as concerned about. We know what drives the bus.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:40 amAll of their fans are right about what they have going for them but UAB is the best shot of that group. JMU won't get to skip everyone and go straight to AAC from the FCS and Ga State is not good enough at football. I'm sure the AAC saw what happened to C-USA for just going after TV markets and how that has set them back on the field.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
AAC definitely does not want anyone else at the moment but if they invite us we should jump for sure. The good news is that Gillin and those with a say would accept the invite so I'm glad they are in charge. Like you said, a regional conference would only set us back.
I wonder if the same people who don't think we should go to the AAC are the ones who warned that moving FBS would be a mistake?
You say yes and figure it out. How many extra donors do we get from upgrading conferences? Hell what does our Saturday basketball attendance look like when it’s Houston, Cincinnati, Memphis and Wichita State coming to town?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:32 pmYou’re sure Gillin would accept? There are those out there who think it’s a no go due to budget concerns, which i don’t necessarily disagree with. I just think it’s something you do and figure it out as you go along. I’m in the camp of I think we could compete now in the AAC even at our current budget. I guess the concern is the other sports, which to be frank I’m not as concerned about. We know what drives the bus.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:40 amAll of their fans are right about what they have going for them but UAB is the best shot of that group. JMU won't get to skip everyone and go straight to AAC from the FCS and Ga State is not good enough at football. I'm sure the AAC saw what happened to C-USA for just going after TV markets and how that has set them back on the field.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
AAC definitely does not want anyone else at the moment but if they invite us we should jump for sure. The good news is that Gillin and those with a say would accept the invite so I'm glad they are in charge. Like you said, a regional conference would only set us back.
I wonder if the same people who don't think we should go to the AAC are the ones who warned that moving FBS would be a mistake?
That was said somewhat flippantly, but it is a budget of about $25M - you’d have about $6M/year extra from TV revenue. I think there’s a way to make $30M work for you, call me crazy./\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 3:09 pmFigure out a budget as you go along? App State printing money like the Federal Reserve?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:32 pmYou’re sure Gillin would accept? There are those out there who think it’s a no go due to budget concerns, which i don’t necessarily disagree with. I just think it’s something you do and figure it out as you go along. I’m in the camp of I think we could compete now in the AAC even at our current budget. I guess the concern is the other sports, which to be frank I’m not as concerned about. We know what drives the bus.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:40 amAll of their fans are right about what they have going for them but UAB is the best shot of that group. JMU won't get to skip everyone and go straight to AAC from the FCS and Ga State is not good enough at football. I'm sure the AAC saw what happened to C-USA for just going after TV markets and how that has set them back on the field.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
AAC definitely does not want anyone else at the moment but if they invite us we should jump for sure. The good news is that Gillin and those with a say would accept the invite so I'm glad they are in charge. Like you said, a regional conference would only set us back.
I wonder if the same people who don't think we should go to the AAC are the ones who warned that moving FBS would be a mistake?
That’s the way I see it, but it seems most folks just don’t think App can figure out how to make it work. Sounds a lot like 2013.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 3:37 pmYou say yes and figure it out. How many extra donors do we get from upgrading conferences? Hell what does our Saturday basketball attendance look like when it’s Houston, Cincinnati, Memphis and Wichita State coming to town?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:32 pmYou’re sure Gillin would accept? There are those out there who think it’s a no go due to budget concerns, which i don’t necessarily disagree with. I just think it’s something you do and figure it out as you go along. I’m in the camp of I think we could compete now in the AAC even at our current budget. I guess the concern is the other sports, which to be frank I’m not as concerned about. We know what drives the bus.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:40 amAll of their fans are right about what they have going for them but UAB is the best shot of that group. JMU won't get to skip everyone and go straight to AAC from the FCS and Ga State is not good enough at football. I'm sure the AAC saw what happened to C-USA for just going after TV markets and how that has set them back on the field.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 amI see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.APPdiesel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 9:22 amIt’s funny…I read message boards (I like to see if our fans sound as crazy as others). Some of us think we’re shoe-ins for the AAC because we have good football. Georgia State and UAB think they’re shoe-ins because “marketz”. JMU thinks they’re shoe-ins because of their facilities.
AAC fans don’t want any of us. A stray fan may say “App State for football only” but that gets shot down quickly. They want Army, Air Force, Boise State, or BYU (who they obviously won’t get). AAC fans only want a program that will instantly vault them into P6 status and the only program that could already turned them down.
Now obviously fans don’t make big decisions (and that’s a good thing because we’re all unhinged) but most AAC fans right now are saying “stay put at 11 until we have no other choice than to extend an invitation”.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
AAC definitely does not want anyone else at the moment but if they invite us we should jump for sure. The good news is that Gillin and those with a say would accept the invite so I'm glad they are in charge. Like you said, a regional conference would only set us back.
I wonder if the same people who don't think we should go to the AAC are the ones who warned that moving FBS would be a mistake?
Where are you getting that $6 million figure from?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 4:01 pmThat was said somewhat flippantly, but it is a budget of about $25M - you’d have about $6M/year extra from TV revenue. I think there’s a way to make $30M work for you, call me crazy./\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 3:09 pmFigure out a budget as you go along? App State printing money like the Federal Reserve?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:32 pmYou’re sure Gillin would accept? There are those out there who think it’s a no go due to budget concerns, which i don’t necessarily disagree with. I just think it’s something you do and figure it out as you go along. I’m in the camp of I think we could compete now in the AAC even at our current budget. I guess the concern is the other sports, which to be frank I’m not as concerned about. We know what drives the bus.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:40 amAll of their fans are right about what they have going for them but UAB is the best shot of that group. JMU won't get to skip everyone and go straight to AAC from the FCS and Ga State is not good enough at football. I'm sure the AAC saw what happened to C-USA for just going after TV markets and how that has set them back on the field.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:21 am
I see no reason why the AAC would move off of 11, if we’re being honest App isn’t gonna add money to an AAC TV deal most likely and adding a team would just reduce money from the other 11.
That being said, I still find it wild that the AAC isn’t the goal for most App fans. The regional stuff is a pipe dream, ain’t happening. Now with the playoff expanding to 12 there’s a pretty decent to significant chance the AAC leaves the rest of the G5 behind, Mike Aresco said as much yesterday. I just don’t get why App fans want to get left behind, yet again, especially when we’ll have a brand new $50M facility sitting on the North side, pretty much going to waste. Money could have definitely been spent elsewhere. But hey, at least y’all will have driveable games to JMU again.
AAC definitely does not want anyone else at the moment but if they invite us we should jump for sure. The good news is that Gillin and those with a say would accept the invite so I'm glad they are in charge. Like you said, a regional conference would only set us back.
I wonder if the same people who don't think we should go to the AAC are the ones who warned that moving FBS would be a mistake?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatod ... p/39229011AppSt94 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 6:11 pmWhere are you getting that $6 million figure from?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 4:01 pmThat was said somewhat flippantly, but it is a budget of about $25M - you’d have about $6M/year extra from TV revenue. I think there’s a way to make $30M work for you, call me crazy./\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 3:09 pmFigure out a budget as you go along? App State printing money like the Federal Reserve?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:32 pmYou’re sure Gillin would accept? There are those out there who think it’s a no go due to budget concerns, which i don’t necessarily disagree with. I just think it’s something you do and figure it out as you go along. I’m in the camp of I think we could compete now in the AAC even at our current budget. I guess the concern is the other sports, which to be frank I’m not as concerned about. We know what drives the bus.AppStFan1 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 9:40 am
All of their fans are right about what they have going for them but UAB is the best shot of that group. JMU won't get to skip everyone and go straight to AAC from the FCS and Ga State is not good enough at football. I'm sure the AAC saw what happened to C-USA for just going after TV markets and how that has set them back on the field.
AAC definitely does not want anyone else at the moment but if they invite us we should jump for sure. The good news is that Gillin and those with a say would accept the invite so I'm glad they are in charge. Like you said, a regional conference would only set us back.
I wonder if the same people who don't think we should go to the AAC are the ones who warned that moving FBS would be a mistake?
So the $6 million is taking into account what we are getting from the Sun Belt? $7 million minus $1 million = $6? Is that correct?NavyApp wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 6:26 pmhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatod ... p/39229011AppSt94 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 6:11 pmWhere are you getting that $6 million figure from?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 4:01 pmThat was said somewhat flippantly, but it is a budget of about $25M - you’d have about $6M/year extra from TV revenue. I think there’s a way to make $30M work for you, call me crazy./\PP ST/\TE GRAD 09 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 3:09 pmFigure out a budget as you go along? App State printing money like the Federal Reserve?Yosef10 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 11, 2021 2:32 pm
You’re sure Gillin would accept? There are those out there who think it’s a no go due to budget concerns, which i don’t necessarily disagree with. I just think it’s something you do and figure it out as you go along. I’m in the camp of I think we could compete now in the AAC even at our current budget. I guess the concern is the other sports, which to be frank I’m not as concerned about. We know what drives the bus.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the contracts have not been signed, said the deal will provide the conference with about $83.3 million per year, with each member school receiving an average of just under $7 million a year.
Article was written in 2019