I saw it a diff way, he could have kept kicking field goals (scoring) but instead ran up the gut plays on 4th and med. can’t stop that, well then . . .App_in_Maiden wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 9:22 amThey could have. I shoulder have worded it differently. It was more in line with the ones made dabo went for it on 4th down.
Clemson game thread and discussion
-
- Posts: 1394
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 7:28 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Raleigh
- Has thanked: 1033 times
- Been thanked: 677 times
- Contact:
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
1996
-
- Posts: 10634
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7036 times
- Been thanked: 4478 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
The season was always going to start next week. ETSU was the weakest opponent on our schedule and Clemson was the strongest. Next week is where you see where things can go. I get the panic and despair, but how much of that is how we lost and not that we lost? I get it and I’m not going to put lipstick on a pig, but let’s look at some things that should be good signs. The Clemson defensive front four are all NFL caliber guys. 43 drop backs and only 1 sack. That is a good sign that the line is gelling. Joey had a bad day but I don’t think he sees that kind of pressure the rest of the year. The defense is a work in progress but they will get there. Injuries and issues aside, we should be fine.311neers wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:47 amThen we should win the next 10 games we are likely expected to win. Well, a few years ago, we would be expected to win every remaining game in the schedule. Not sure about that anymore though. That’s where we’ve gotten to. Every game is now a toss up.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:44 amWe are two games into a 12 game season. We lost a game that we were likely expected to lose. Let it play out and let’s see how it shakes out.appgrad95&97 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:03 amA playoff birth is out of the question. If we run the table, the CFP committee is going to remember last night. Boise St. was competitive against Oregon, they have the opportunity to have signature wins. A 12-1 Sun Belt champion won't get the credit a 10-3 MW or American champion gets. Not with the memory of what we looked like with a competitive (not elite) P4 program. Can we win the conference, sure, but we haven't under Clark. Yes he's played for two in four years, but we weren't particularly competitive. And let's not forget, we only technically won the East last year. A week ago we were given less than 3% chance of making the playoffs. The rest of the world sees us for what we are. We are an above average FBS football program. That's it.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 9:14 amI haven’t read this thread since yesterday and I don’t really see the point.
Is it justifiable to be disappointed in the results yesterday? Absolutely
Were we out-coached yesterday? No question. They knew our gameplan on defense and figured out how to exploit it. Kudos to them.
Were we outmanned yesterday? It certainly appears so. That is a good football team with superior talent.
Does anyone deserved to be fired for last night? No.
Will anyone be fired for last night? Again, NO!
I’m not going to pick on player performance but the passing game was off badly yesterday and that was on all parts.
The results of last night do not change anything about the team goals. The SBC East, the conference championship and a possible CFP berth are all still attainable.
Clemson was the best opponent that we will face this season unless we get into the CFP.
The games over, the season starts next week with 10 games about G5 peers.
If you want to sit and stew in your feeling, feel free. We have another game in 7 days.
GO APP!
Castle looks like the guy that can be a feature back.
- AppDub
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:52 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1335 times
- Been thanked: 594 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
I agree. Even if we could, this staff would not embarrass anyone with the score. It is more likely that they will lose a game we are winning by taking the foot off the gas out of fear of being disrespectful. You can still be respectful and put teams away. I'd rather have a dominate team and a few other coaches dislike our HC, than have everyone love him and not be a conference winner at least every couple of years. Style points matter these days unfortunately.appstatealum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:49 amWith the turnover in personnel, it wouldn't be out of left field if things gelled and we ran the table. BUT, we would need to do it in dramatic fashion like Clemson did to us and absolutely embarrass teams, which I don't see happening with this staff. Some of us need to stop looking at CFB the way we used to, it's a completely different game. I still like it, but I don't have the same passion I once did bc it's never going to be worthy of that again. That's just a fact. There is a reason why I promoted the idea of being a launchpad program for coaches instead of trying to duplicate traditions of old. This just isn't the same sport it once was.
-
- Posts: 4314
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2022 10:34 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1953 times
- Been thanked: 1377 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Yep, we were going to be 1-1 sitting here.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 11:03 amThe season was always going to start next week. ETSU was the weakest opponent on our schedule and Clemson was the strongest. Next week is where you see where things can go. I get the panic and despair, but how much of that is how we lost and not that we lost? I get it and I’m not going to put lipstick on a pig, but let’s look at some things that should be good signs. The Clemson defensive front four are all NFL caliber guys. 43 drop backs and only 1 sack. That is a good sign that the line is gelling. Joey had a bad day but I don’t think he sees that kind of pressure the rest of the year. The defense is a work in progress but they will get there. Injuries and issues aside, we should be fine.311neers wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:47 amThen we should win the next 10 games we are likely expected to win. Well, a few years ago, we would be expected to win every remaining game in the schedule. Not sure about that anymore though. That’s where we’ve gotten to. Every game is now a toss up.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:44 amWe are two games into a 12 game season. We lost a game that we were likely expected to lose. Let it play out and let’s see how it shakes out.appgrad95&97 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:03 amA playoff birth is out of the question. If we run the table, the CFP committee is going to remember last night. Boise St. was competitive against Oregon, they have the opportunity to have signature wins. A 12-1 Sun Belt champion won't get the credit a 10-3 MW or American champion gets. Not with the memory of what we looked like with a competitive (not elite) P4 program. Can we win the conference, sure, but we haven't under Clark. Yes he's played for two in four years, but we weren't particularly competitive. And let's not forget, we only technically won the East last year. A week ago we were given less than 3% chance of making the playoffs. The rest of the world sees us for what we are. We are an above average FBS football program. That's it.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 9:14 amI haven’t read this thread since yesterday and I don’t really see the point.
Is it justifiable to be disappointed in the results yesterday? Absolutely
Were we out-coached yesterday? No question. They knew our gameplan on defense and figured out how to exploit it. Kudos to them.
Were we outmanned yesterday? It certainly appears so. That is a good football team with superior talent.
Does anyone deserved to be fired for last night? No.
Will anyone be fired for last night? Again, NO!
I’m not going to pick on player performance but the passing game was off badly yesterday and that was on all parts.
The results of last night do not change anything about the team goals. The SBC East, the conference championship and a possible CFP berth are all still attainable.
Clemson was the best opponent that we will face this season unless we get into the CFP.
The games over, the season starts next week with 10 games about G5 peers.
If you want to sit and stew in your feeling, feel free. We have another game in 7 days.
GO APP!
Castle looks like the guy that can be a feature back.
Our offense will be fine, OL held their own in pass pro but we didn’t have much time to drive it downfield- All short routes. Going back to my point about the pass rush…where is it? Kade had more time than a 7 on 7 tourney where they aren’t allowed to rush the QB.
I’m just saying- 5 years ago, we would be favored and expected to win the next 10 games on our schedule. Fast forward to present day- we have 10 games left, all 10 feel like toss up games. I miss the days not too long ago where we could sit here and put a W next to a week 8 game and not even have to think twice about it. But, stuff changes, different NCAAF landscape now, different coaching staff, players, portal, etc. Have to find a way to mend the D and win some games.
-
- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1358 times
- Been thanked: 1500 times
- beav910
- Posts: 545
- Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 9:13 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
ECU is our first true test against peer competition. I’m really interested to see what happens there. After sleeping on it though, blowouts happen even if it’s rare for us. NCSU got demolished by Tennessee last night and that’s a supposed peer to peer matchup. As for the Clark discussion, from the outside looking in its an interesting dynamic for sure. Do you keep the guy who is pretty much close but no cigar partly because he won’t go looking for other jobs?
Appalachian State Alumnus :: Graphic Designer
-
- Posts: 1182
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 10:09 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 311 times
- Been thanked: 325 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
I’m going to throw in a positive from last night….this was the first time I’ve attended a game on the road vs a P4 opponent. Clemson fans that I encountered were all super cordial and respectful of our program/school. I didn’t stumble across a single a-hole. Tailgates were all very chill and folks were hospitable. CU is a very nice campus and they have an amazing gameday culture.
- hapapp
- Posts: 16767
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 12:48 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Rocky Mount, VA
- Has thanked: 2572 times
- Been thanked: 2923 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
I hesitate to state this because I don't want it to be seen as an over reaction, but two games into the season, Joey is not playing anywhere near what he displayed last year. It is early, and one game was against a vastly superior opponent. But, while the yards are coming, something seems out of sync.
-
- Posts: 13763
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2000 9:41 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3242 times
- Been thanked: 2992 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
He can’t set his feet.hapapp wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 12:07 pmI hesitate to state this because I don't want it to be seen as an over reaction, but two games into the season, Joey is not playing anywhere near what he displayed last year. It is early, and one game was against a vastly superior opponent. But, while the yards are coming, something seems out of sync.
"Some people call me hillbilly. Some people call me mountain man. You can call me Appalachian. Appalachian's what I am."-- Del McCoury Band
- McLeansvilleAppFan
- Posts: 9370
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Greensboro (McLeansville) NC
- Has thanked: 4304 times
- Been thanked: 2175 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Are there any ADs out there that are so flush with cash from other sources they can tell big donors to pound sand? I don't really like that system but unless we somehow require anonymous donations I doubt that ever gets to change. I only hope they folks with money make good decisions.appstatealum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:30 amAgree. It's simpler to just say Doug is manipulated by a few select individuals and as much as I've liked Doug, I wish we had an AD that wasn't a puppet for a few walletsDenverOfTheEast wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:14 amThanks for having me back!311neers wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:54 amTop 5 only because of their schedule. Good team, not great. Welcome back.DenverOfTheEast wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 5:28 amIt's a one off game, Clemson will be top 5 by seasons end....calm down - they had them on two 3rd downs and DB's had mental breakdowns, you can't win the game in the 1st quarter but you sure as hell can lose it.
The more alarming thing and Ive harped on it for a few years now,
The September schedule the AD has put before #TEAMCLARK the last 3 Septembers '22 - '23' '24 has been first class unjust and unfair. The man has zero feel at being able to piece a schedule together in order to help make his program look better..
Ya"ll will dispute me but I am 110% correct on this...cupcakes need to be in place between P5 and rivalry's
#TeamClark still lives here!
Clemson has a top 5 defense... there is no pre season in college so it takes til week 3 to really settle in as a team in college football.
and to reference your Clemson weak schedule comment - that's my point - App State can't continue to sneak up on these P5's each year and pull off an upset - Dabo had them boys ready, App made 2 3rd down mistakes in 1st quarter and the snowball rolled at that point.
Dummy down the schedule and the playoff is a possibility in the future!!! but not until then, can't ask a App State team to play perfect for 12 games. Doug gives in to the Sofields and Ricks crew on playing the big boys and other decisions -- he can't think for himself to help elevate the program, it's stuck in the purgatory of FBS.... Other schools stepped up there game and all he did was add seats to create more debt.
Now onto a rival game and a SBC game 4 days after that, tough sleding ahead.
Only 3 App State teams since 1990 has finished the season with only 1 loss -- #TeamClark was apart of 2 out of the 3.
This is my very generic signature added to each post.
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:48 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 639 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Problem is that doesn’t seem to be the mindset we have when it comes to games such as ETSU.appst89 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 8:04 amI agree with this. It’s our job to stop them. If we can’t then we get what we get.appstatealum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 8:02 amI'm OK with Dabo doing what he did. He has the right to put up 200 points on us if he wanted to. He has a job to do and new landscape required him to curb stomp our lifeless bodies.
- appstatealum
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:45 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Charlotte/Gastonia
- Has thanked: 3460 times
- Been thanked: 1877 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
You're not wrong. My issue is more about the wallets we have here at App.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 12:26 pmAre there any ADs out there that are so flush with cash from other sources they can tell big donors to pound sand? I don't really like that system but unless we somehow require anonymous donations I doubt that ever gets to change. I only hope they folks with money make good decisions.appstatealum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:30 amAgree. It's simpler to just say Doug is manipulated by a few select individuals and as much as I've liked Doug, I wish we had an AD that wasn't a puppet for a few walletsDenverOfTheEast wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:14 amThanks for having me back!311neers wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:54 amTop 5 only because of their schedule. Good team, not great. Welcome back.DenverOfTheEast wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 5:28 amIt's a one off game, Clemson will be top 5 by seasons end....calm down - they had them on two 3rd downs and DB's had mental breakdowns, you can't win the game in the 1st quarter but you sure as hell can lose it.
The more alarming thing and Ive harped on it for a few years now,
The September schedule the AD has put before #TEAMCLARK the last 3 Septembers '22 - '23' '24 has been first class unjust and unfair. The man has zero feel at being able to piece a schedule together in order to help make his program look better..
Ya"ll will dispute me but I am 110% correct on this...cupcakes need to be in place between P5 and rivalry's
#TeamClark still lives here!
Clemson has a top 5 defense... there is no pre season in college so it takes til week 3 to really settle in as a team in college football.
and to reference your Clemson weak schedule comment - that's my point - App State can't continue to sneak up on these P5's each year and pull off an upset - Dabo had them boys ready, App made 2 3rd down mistakes in 1st quarter and the snowball rolled at that point.
Dummy down the schedule and the playoff is a possibility in the future!!! but not until then, can't ask a App State team to play perfect for 12 games. Doug gives in to the Sofields and Ricks crew on playing the big boys and other decisions -- he can't think for himself to help elevate the program, it's stuck in the purgatory of FBS.... Other schools stepped up there game and all he did was add seats to create more debt.
Now onto a rival game and a SBC game 4 days after that, tough sleding ahead.
Only 3 App State teams since 1990 has finished the season with only 1 loss -- #TeamClark was apart of 2 out of the 3.
The Appalachian State
-
- Posts: 13763
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2000 9:41 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3242 times
- Been thanked: 2992 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
The Panthers: Hold my beer.
"Some people call me hillbilly. Some people call me mountain man. You can call me Appalachian. Appalachian's what I am."-- Del McCoury Band
-
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:33 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 74 times
- Been thanked: 714 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
I can promise you we aren’t the only program where the top donors have big egos.appstatealum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 12:31 pmYou're not wrong. My issue is more about the wallets we have here at App.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 12:26 pmAre there any ADs out there that are so flush with cash from other sources they can tell big donors to pound sand? I don't really like that system but unless we somehow require anonymous donations I doubt that ever gets to change. I only hope they folks with money make good decisions.appstatealum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:30 amAgree. It's simpler to just say Doug is manipulated by a few select individuals and as much as I've liked Doug, I wish we had an AD that wasn't a puppet for a few walletsDenverOfTheEast wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:14 amThanks for having me back!
Clemson has a top 5 defense... there is no pre season in college so it takes til week 3 to really settle in as a team in college football.
and to reference your Clemson weak schedule comment - that's my point - App State can't continue to sneak up on these P5's each year and pull off an upset - Dabo had them boys ready, App made 2 3rd down mistakes in 1st quarter and the snowball rolled at that point.
Dummy down the schedule and the playoff is a possibility in the future!!! but not until then, can't ask a App State team to play perfect for 12 games. Doug gives in to the Sofields and Ricks crew on playing the big boys and other decisions -- he can't think for himself to help elevate the program, it's stuck in the purgatory of FBS.... Other schools stepped up there game and all he did was add seats to create more debt.
Now onto a rival game and a SBC game 4 days after that, tough sleding ahead.
Only 3 App State teams since 1990 has finished the season with only 1 loss -- #TeamClark was apart of 2 out of the 3.
-
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 730 times
- Been thanked: 1599 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
It is but there is NFL talent developed that P4 schools miss every year. If we could find those guys back then we still can find it now. I'm not saying we can be that stacked every year but there is NFL talent that go to low level G5s, FCS, and D2 every year that I bet if we offer them they would have possibly come to App.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:42 amFair question and to be honest that defense was special, especially for a G5 team. That defense had Meech, Charles, Davis-Gaither. Thomas, Jolly, Jackson, Hampton, and Ross. All of them proved to be NFL caliber talent. That is an insane quantity of players for one defense at our level. That is hard to replicate.
Legit recruiting question/debate. There are 4 ways for a team like us to consider. 1. Look to sign 20-25 HS players every year or whatever it takes to fill out the roster with just a couple of transfers per year. 2. Go heavy into the portal by signing 15+ each year and never take double digit HS players. 3. Have a balance with roughly half and half. 4. Completely ignore one of them and go all in on either portal or HS recruiting. Of those 4 which is more likely for us to find diamonds in the rough that could be developed?
NIL question/debate for end of season. I don't know how much our players are getting paid or who all is but I would be curious to compare their seasons to those not getting paid to see if it is worth it. I would also be curious to search if we are better off financially to use NIL money to expand recruiting budget to find more diamonds in the rough or is the money better spend retaining and adding players rather than looking for those diamonds in the rough for free like Nick Hampton, Peoples, Hodges, Jackson, etc.
Last edited by AppStFan1 on Sun Sep 08, 2024 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 730 times
- Been thanked: 1599 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Indeed. The better question is to ask if there is any program where the big donors don't have a big ego? lolBallantyneApp wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 12:46 pmI can promise you we aren’t the only program where the top donors have big egos.appstatealum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 12:31 pmYou're not wrong. My issue is more about the wallets we have here at App.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 12:26 pmAre there any ADs out there that are so flush with cash from other sources they can tell big donors to pound sand? I don't really like that system but unless we somehow require anonymous donations I doubt that ever gets to change. I only hope they folks with money make good decisions.appstatealum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:30 amAgree. It's simpler to just say Doug is manipulated by a few select individuals and as much as I've liked Doug, I wish we had an AD that wasn't a puppet for a few walletsDenverOfTheEast wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:14 am
Thanks for having me back!
Clemson has a top 5 defense... there is no pre season in college so it takes til week 3 to really settle in as a team in college football.
and to reference your Clemson weak schedule comment - that's my point - App State can't continue to sneak up on these P5's each year and pull off an upset - Dabo had them boys ready, App made 2 3rd down mistakes in 1st quarter and the snowball rolled at that point.
Dummy down the schedule and the playoff is a possibility in the future!!! but not until then, can't ask a App State team to play perfect for 12 games. Doug gives in to the Sofields and Ricks crew on playing the big boys and other decisions -- he can't think for himself to help elevate the program, it's stuck in the purgatory of FBS.... Other schools stepped up there game and all he did was add seats to create more debt.
Now onto a rival game and a SBC game 4 days after that, tough sleding ahead.
Only 3 App State teams since 1990 has finished the season with only 1 loss -- #TeamClark was apart of 2 out of the 3.
-
- Posts: 4314
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2022 10:34 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1953 times
- Been thanked: 1377 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
9 quarters without scoring. Longest since the 2000 Bengals. I didn’t think it could get worse than last night.
-
- Posts: 13593
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 8:42 am
- Has thanked: 3436 times
- Been thanked: 5314 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Unfortunately that is correlated with a similar record and seasons at State.
-
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 730 times
- Been thanked: 1599 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
The internal expectation in Boone is 11+ wins and a SBC title but Vegas, ESPN, and most people who project wins had us as 8.5. I do consider this a game we are expected to lose since we are on the road. A lot of prognosticators had us losing to Clemson, East Carolina, Liberty, and 1-2 conference losses. I feel like we are either pretty solid and will come out mad and beat ECU by double digits or we are just not that good and ECU beats us. I am optimistic we come out mad and win but if we lose I won't expect to beat Liberty and will expect to lose at least 2 SBC games.appgrad95&97 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:54 amESPN gives ECU a 57.3% chance of winning. I'm guessing Vegas will have us as a road dog. Soooo, will that count as a game we are expected to lose? That's a legitimate question. I get that we are two games into the season. But in fairness, we have four seasons under Clark to look at.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:44 amWe are two games into a 12 game season. We lost a game that we were likely expected to lose. Let it play out and let’s see how it shakes out.appgrad95&97 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 10:03 amA playoff birth is out of the question. If we run the table, the CFP committee is going to remember last night. Boise St. was competitive against Oregon, they have the opportunity to have signature wins. A 12-1 Sun Belt champion won't get the credit a 10-3 MW or American champion gets. Not with the memory of what we looked like with a competitive (not elite) P4 program. Can we win the conference, sure, but we haven't under Clark. Yes he's played for two in four years, but we weren't particularly competitive. And let's not forget, we only technically won the East last year. A week ago we were given less than 3% chance of making the playoffs. The rest of the world sees us for what we are. We are an above average FBS football program. That's it.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 9:14 amI haven’t read this thread since yesterday and I don’t really see the point.
Is it justifiable to be disappointed in the results yesterday? Absolutely
Were we out-coached yesterday? No question. They knew our gameplan on defense and figured out how to exploit it. Kudos to them.
Were we outmanned yesterday? It certainly appears so. That is a good football team with superior talent.
Does anyone deserved to be fired for last night? No.
Will anyone be fired for last night? Again, NO!
I’m not going to pick on player performance but the passing game was off badly yesterday and that was on all parts.
The results of last night do not change anything about the team goals. The SBC East, the conference championship and a possible CFP berth are all still attainable.
Clemson was the best opponent that we will face this season unless we get into the CFP.
The games over, the season starts next week with 10 games about G5 peers.
If you want to sit and stew in your feeling, feel free. We have another game in 7 days.
GO APP!
-
- Posts: 10634
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7036 times
- Been thanked: 4478 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
We are 1-1, which is likely what most of all figured would be the situation after two games.