USA Today report on money in athletics
Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 11:54 am
I am putting in the AppState football category because there is information in the report regarding AppState, but the issue I found most interesting in this article concerns a new law in Virginia. I'll touch on that in a moment.
AppState, according to the data in the article, had athletic revenues of $19,414,754 and expenses of $19,320,283. Of the revenue, $10,283,987 came from subsidies from either the university or student fees or both. Subsidies thus represented 52.97% of revenue. (The table still lists both ASU and GaSouthern as in the Southern conference. Not sure why.)
The new Virginia law I mentioned above, goes into effect in June 2016, would put a limit on the amount of subsidy money that a school can get for athletics. The schools will have 5 years to meet the new requirements, and then can get an additional five years if needed.
The percentage depends on where they play athletics. For instance, if you play in a power 5 conference, no more than 20% of revenue can be from subsidies (UVA and VT already meet that threshold). If you are in the FBS but not power 5 (read ODU) the max subsidy is 55%. ODU is currently at 65% ($26M subsidy on revenue of $41M). If you play at FCS (JMU) the max subsidy amount is 70%. JMU is currently at a whopping 82% ($36M subsidy on revenue of $44M). In essence, what that means is that JMU would have to go from an 82% subsidy amount down to a 55% subsidy amount if they decide to move up to FBS. Keeping their revenue constant that means shifting $11M from subsidies to other revenue; or dropping expenses.
This will probably play into JMU's decision on whether to move up.
Link to article: http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/co ... /27971457/
Link to database: http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/
AppState, according to the data in the article, had athletic revenues of $19,414,754 and expenses of $19,320,283. Of the revenue, $10,283,987 came from subsidies from either the university or student fees or both. Subsidies thus represented 52.97% of revenue. (The table still lists both ASU and GaSouthern as in the Southern conference. Not sure why.)
The new Virginia law I mentioned above, goes into effect in June 2016, would put a limit on the amount of subsidy money that a school can get for athletics. The schools will have 5 years to meet the new requirements, and then can get an additional five years if needed.
The percentage depends on where they play athletics. For instance, if you play in a power 5 conference, no more than 20% of revenue can be from subsidies (UVA and VT already meet that threshold). If you are in the FBS but not power 5 (read ODU) the max subsidy is 55%. ODU is currently at 65% ($26M subsidy on revenue of $41M). If you play at FCS (JMU) the max subsidy amount is 70%. JMU is currently at a whopping 82% ($36M subsidy on revenue of $44M). In essence, what that means is that JMU would have to go from an 82% subsidy amount down to a 55% subsidy amount if they decide to move up to FBS. Keeping their revenue constant that means shifting $11M from subsidies to other revenue; or dropping expenses.
This will probably play into JMU's decision on whether to move up.
Link to article: http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/co ... /27971457/
Link to database: http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/