The SEC Gets It's Way-And it Stings
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 1:17 pm
I know this has been out there for more than 24 hours but I've waited to say anything until App released a statement plus we've (site guys) have asked some questions to see what, if anything, App can do.
http://saturdaytradition.com/big-ten-fo ... tte-camps/
For those who don't know the SEC and their water boy (the ACC) have been pushing for a ban on satellite camps for football recruiting. And in typical NCAA fashion they not only caved to the mighty SEC, but they took it to the complete limit by banning all off campus camps completely. There could have been some restrictions placed on them (only in state camps, limited off campus events, limited out of state events, limited joint events, etc) but no, as usual it's one extreme or the other. For those that have been following, this mainly has to do with other P5 conference schools setting up camps in SEC, and to a lesser extent ACC areas, to see and evaluate recruits. The SEC, lead by Sabin, has been wanting to stop this for a while. And B1G/Big 12 schools like Michigan (Harbaugh had 11 satellite camps set for this year alone, most in SEC/ACC territory) have been rubbing salt in the wound of the SEC, which just made them more determined. But taking a close look at this situation it's the G5's like App who will be hurt the most by this ruling.
Most B1G/Big12 schools, even without the camps, will still get the 4/5 star players to come to them, just because of who they are. And a lot of the G5's that are in good recruiting areas will get the borderline P5 and and expected G5 players from their footprints. It's worth noting that the Sun Belt agreed with the decision.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/sto ... mmediately
People are trying to get specifics from the Belt concerning who supported the ban (we know App would not have supported it) but it's not a leap to expect that schools like our biggest buddies to the southeast, their in state friends in ATL, and even schools like Texas St and the AL/LA schools would be very much in favor because it makes it that much harder for outlier schools like App to recruit our most productive areas (GA/FL, and this year the plan was for AL to become even more of a target as we have been getting much interest from recruits in that area and we are planning to hit it even harder for 2017). Also, for those who haven't figured it out yet, this ban is for ALL camps not on a schools campus. This means even our NC camps (this year they were Charlotte and Greenville) are gone as well. We can't even set up a off campus camp in our own state.
Simply put, this is a fight between P5's that will wind up hurting the G5's in the end, especially those like App that are not in traditionally good areas for recruiting and that are more rural, thus making it harder for recruits to try and come here for a camp. Does anyone really think the satellite camps we had last year in GA/FL with Valdosta St hurt the SEC or the ACC even a little? And just a note, we signed players for the just ended 2016 class from every one of the off campus camps we participated in. And a majority of most of our recent signees in the past several classes either were found at or got on our radar at, off campus camps.
What this boils down to is that our recruiting just got harder. Given our traditional areas of GA/FL, and the new areas we're trying to expand to, it's now going to be a lot harder to get recruits to Boone for camps. It was A LOT easier, and much less expensive, for recruits from pretty much our entire footprint to get themselves in front of, worked with, and evaluated by our coaches at camps in GA/FL and even Charlotte and eastern NC. Now anyone who wants to put themselves in front of our coaches, or that we really want see and evaluate in person, is going to have to make the trip to Boone. Some will be able to do it (mostly local NC recruits and those in the closer parts of surrounding states) but most will not, which means we will be recruiting more based on film and attending games of targets than actually being able to have hands on work with them, putting them through drills to find any issues, etc. Just think how many recruits from dozens of different high schools that a group of coaches could see in one place. Now we will have to travel to many of those schools to see them, and those visits don't include a full day of drills and evals. More HS visits means more travel and more money spent. And for the recruits themselves that means the kids the G5s and below are signing won't get as much visibility to multiple programs as they would before. App signed 10 Florida kids in 2016, many of which started that process by competing at one of the joint events with Valdosta St. The staff's evaluation process just got that much more difficult and, more significantly, the recruits opportunities will be diminished. We also have to think about on campus events with the more local recruits, with parents who work on weekends and aren't comfortable with their kids driving all the way to App, but would've been fine with them getting to sites in Charlotte, Greenville, or other NC locations?
Bottom line. This is going to sting us. It's going to make our recruiting a lot more difficult in the areas where we've had a lot of success. And we're going to be just a little more blind in our evals of targets. To finish I'm going to quote David from over on Scout on his post on the subject, which we have discussed at length. "Who's speaking for the student-athlete? I thought that was the NCAA's primary purpose - to protect the kids. The most important link in this entire chain - the players - just got trampled, and all because guys like Saban, who can't have enough advantages to suit himself, and Harbaugh, who can't keep his Grand Canyon-esque ego and mouth in check, can push a worthless figurehead like (Mark) Emmert into a corner." Sums it up pretty well for me.
http://saturdaytradition.com/big-ten-fo ... tte-camps/
For those who don't know the SEC and their water boy (the ACC) have been pushing for a ban on satellite camps for football recruiting. And in typical NCAA fashion they not only caved to the mighty SEC, but they took it to the complete limit by banning all off campus camps completely. There could have been some restrictions placed on them (only in state camps, limited off campus events, limited out of state events, limited joint events, etc) but no, as usual it's one extreme or the other. For those that have been following, this mainly has to do with other P5 conference schools setting up camps in SEC, and to a lesser extent ACC areas, to see and evaluate recruits. The SEC, lead by Sabin, has been wanting to stop this for a while. And B1G/Big 12 schools like Michigan (Harbaugh had 11 satellite camps set for this year alone, most in SEC/ACC territory) have been rubbing salt in the wound of the SEC, which just made them more determined. But taking a close look at this situation it's the G5's like App who will be hurt the most by this ruling.
Most B1G/Big12 schools, even without the camps, will still get the 4/5 star players to come to them, just because of who they are. And a lot of the G5's that are in good recruiting areas will get the borderline P5 and and expected G5 players from their footprints. It's worth noting that the Sun Belt agreed with the decision.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/sto ... mmediately
People are trying to get specifics from the Belt concerning who supported the ban (we know App would not have supported it) but it's not a leap to expect that schools like our biggest buddies to the southeast, their in state friends in ATL, and even schools like Texas St and the AL/LA schools would be very much in favor because it makes it that much harder for outlier schools like App to recruit our most productive areas (GA/FL, and this year the plan was for AL to become even more of a target as we have been getting much interest from recruits in that area and we are planning to hit it even harder for 2017). Also, for those who haven't figured it out yet, this ban is for ALL camps not on a schools campus. This means even our NC camps (this year they were Charlotte and Greenville) are gone as well. We can't even set up a off campus camp in our own state.
Simply put, this is a fight between P5's that will wind up hurting the G5's in the end, especially those like App that are not in traditionally good areas for recruiting and that are more rural, thus making it harder for recruits to try and come here for a camp. Does anyone really think the satellite camps we had last year in GA/FL with Valdosta St hurt the SEC or the ACC even a little? And just a note, we signed players for the just ended 2016 class from every one of the off campus camps we participated in. And a majority of most of our recent signees in the past several classes either were found at or got on our radar at, off campus camps.
What this boils down to is that our recruiting just got harder. Given our traditional areas of GA/FL, and the new areas we're trying to expand to, it's now going to be a lot harder to get recruits to Boone for camps. It was A LOT easier, and much less expensive, for recruits from pretty much our entire footprint to get themselves in front of, worked with, and evaluated by our coaches at camps in GA/FL and even Charlotte and eastern NC. Now anyone who wants to put themselves in front of our coaches, or that we really want see and evaluate in person, is going to have to make the trip to Boone. Some will be able to do it (mostly local NC recruits and those in the closer parts of surrounding states) but most will not, which means we will be recruiting more based on film and attending games of targets than actually being able to have hands on work with them, putting them through drills to find any issues, etc. Just think how many recruits from dozens of different high schools that a group of coaches could see in one place. Now we will have to travel to many of those schools to see them, and those visits don't include a full day of drills and evals. More HS visits means more travel and more money spent. And for the recruits themselves that means the kids the G5s and below are signing won't get as much visibility to multiple programs as they would before. App signed 10 Florida kids in 2016, many of which started that process by competing at one of the joint events with Valdosta St. The staff's evaluation process just got that much more difficult and, more significantly, the recruits opportunities will be diminished. We also have to think about on campus events with the more local recruits, with parents who work on weekends and aren't comfortable with their kids driving all the way to App, but would've been fine with them getting to sites in Charlotte, Greenville, or other NC locations?
Bottom line. This is going to sting us. It's going to make our recruiting a lot more difficult in the areas where we've had a lot of success. And we're going to be just a little more blind in our evals of targets. To finish I'm going to quote David from over on Scout on his post on the subject, which we have discussed at length. "Who's speaking for the student-athlete? I thought that was the NCAA's primary purpose - to protect the kids. The most important link in this entire chain - the players - just got trampled, and all because guys like Saban, who can't have enough advantages to suit himself, and Harbaugh, who can't keep his Grand Canyon-esque ego and mouth in check, can push a worthless figurehead like (Mark) Emmert into a corner." Sums it up pretty well for me.