appst89 wrote:I think he got what he deserved. I don't tolerate any sort of racism personally or professionally. But my lack of tolerance for it goes both ways, not just one direction.Maddog1956 wrote:My point exactly. To some people, being made to take responsibility for their comments is equal to "know your place, boy". In this case mostly white owners didn't say "know your place", they said "you don't deserve to own a team in our league".appst89 wrote: The problem, apparently, is that you haven't suffered enough for the sins of your forefathers. It makes no difference to some here that you've never treated anyone differently. Somebody did back when, so you have to suffer for it. What you're being told is, "Know your place, boy." Kind of ironic, really, since that sort of thought is supposedly what they are railing against.
It's really not suffering for the sins of your forefathers as much as understanding that others did suffer from the sins of your forefathers and they certain don't want it to happen again.
People trying to defend this owners actions (punishment) are really laying down their own sins without any help from their forefathers.
For some reason I usually hear "I never treated anyone differently" and "I'm not a racist" before some form of racist comment.
I agree 100% racism is racism, hate is hate. If I have any exception it may be for it's use in an artist sense, only due to the fact that art should get people to think. It's a fine line. Kind of line porn.