Page 1 of 2

To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:57 pm
by GreatAppSt
To AMC or not to AMC

That is the question.

I have some AMC Ent. stock. I got in about a month ago. Do y'all think the short squeeze phenomena is real? or a bubble that has already reached its peak?

discuss

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2021 9:06 pm
by appdaze





Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2021 10:02 pm
by TheAppalachianState
Take your profits man!!! There is bound to be a fat daddy rug pull

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2021 10:03 pm
by TheAppalachianState
I say that, but I bought AMC at $11 and bitched out early... didn’t think it was real

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2021 8:03 am
by Saint3333
Diamond hands will be disappointed.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2021 10:31 am
by beenthere25
$CLOV...better fundamentals, high squeeze potential, great price, and even if it doesn't squeeze it's a better long term investment than AMC.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2021 6:47 pm
by TheAppalachianState
beenthere25 wrote:
Sun Jun 20, 2021 10:31 am
$CLOV...better fundamentals, high squeeze potential, great price, and even if it doesn't squeeze it's a better long term investment than AMC.
With Chelsea Clinton on the BOD, I highly advise selling your position prior to $30. They can sell stakes when it reaches $30

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2021 8:25 pm
by Bootsy
Reddit got nothing on the YC investor's threads, yo!

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:25 am
by TheMoody1
GreatAppSt wrote:
Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:57 pm
To AMC or not to AMC

That is the question.

I have some AMC Ent. stock. I got in about a month ago. Do y'all think the short squeeze phenomena is real? or a bubble that has already reached its peak?

discuss
Depends on what price you got in at. I am up over 600%, so I have plenty of room to bail if the bottom falls out. My son tells me this will eventually squeeze and shoot up like Gamestop. :D

https://stocktwits.com/symbol/AMC

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2021 1:03 pm
by Black Saturday
TheMoody1 wrote:
Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:25 am
GreatAppSt wrote:
Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:57 pm
To AMC or not to AMC

That is the question.

I have some AMC Ent. stock. I got in about a month ago. Do y'all think the short squeeze phenomena is real? or a bubble that has already reached its peak?

discuss
Depends on what price you got in at. I am up over 600%, so I have plenty of room to bail if the bottom falls out. My son tells me this will eventually squeeze and shoot up like Gamestop. :D

https://stocktwits.com/symbol/AMC
AMC has 500 Million shares and supposedly 4 million shareholders, GME had a squeeze with 55 million share structure, there are a lot of guessing going on as to what Citadel is up to with shorting with naked short shares...at this point you cant go wrong by taking the profit being up that much, imo. Missed the gamma squeeze this past Friday finishing under $60 calls, hedges would have been forced to buy shares to cover. No guarantees that it'll squeeze, could still go to $100-125, got to get by the mid $70s first. I got out Friday, playing it safe.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2021 1:33 pm
by TheMoody1
Black Saturday wrote:
Mon Jun 21, 2021 1:03 pm
TheMoody1 wrote:
Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:25 am
GreatAppSt wrote:
Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:57 pm
To AMC or not to AMC

That is the question.

I have some AMC Ent. stock. I got in about a month ago. Do y'all think the short squeeze phenomena is real? or a bubble that has already reached its peak?

discuss
Depends on what price you got in at. I am up over 600%, so I have plenty of room to bail if the bottom falls out. My son tells me this will eventually squeeze and shoot up like Gamestop. :D

https://stocktwits.com/symbol/AMC
AMC has 500 Million shares and supposedly 4 million shareholders, GME had a squeeze with 55 million share structure, there are a lot of guessing going on as to what Citadel is up to with shorting with naked short shares...at this point you cant go wrong by taking the profit being up that much, imo. Missed the gamma squeeze this past Friday finishing under $60 calls, hedges would have been forced to buy shares to cover. No guarantees that it'll squeeze, could still go to $100-125, got to get by the mid $70s first. I got out Friday, playing it safe.
The only thing I know is that if I sell now in the 50's, it will surely go to $120. :lol:

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2021 3:11 pm
by Black Saturday
TheMoody1 wrote:
Mon Jun 21, 2021 1:33 pm
Black Saturday wrote:
Mon Jun 21, 2021 1:03 pm
TheMoody1 wrote:
Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:25 am
GreatAppSt wrote:
Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:57 pm
To AMC or not to AMC

That is the question.

I have some AMC Ent. stock. I got in about a month ago. Do y'all think the short squeeze phenomena is real? or a bubble that has already reached its peak?

discuss
Depends on what price you got in at. I am up over 600%, so I have plenty of room to bail if the bottom falls out. My son tells me this will eventually squeeze and shoot up like Gamestop. :D

https://stocktwits.com/symbol/AMC
AMC has 500 Million shares and supposedly 4 million shareholders, GME had a squeeze with 55 million share structure, there are a lot of guessing going on as to what Citadel is up to with shorting with naked short shares...at this point you cant go wrong by taking the profit being up that much, imo. Missed the gamma squeeze this past Friday finishing under $60 calls, hedges would have been forced to buy shares to cover. No guarantees that it'll squeeze, could still go to $100-125, got to get by the mid $70s first. I got out Friday, playing it safe.
The only thing I know is that if I sell now in the 50's, it will surely go to $120. :lol:
I see we have similar luck... usually if I buy, once "they" find out it goes down, and if I sell or don't buy and they find out, it goes up.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:45 am
by Deano
I heard some one say that Nancy Pelosi bought 28 million dollars worth of AMC a week or two ago, she's statistically the best investor in the world, just saying, maybe the politicians know something.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:08 am
by Saint3333
I seldom agree with AOC, but she's spot on that US elected officials and their families should be treated similar to investment professionals and insiders on individual stocks, i.e. restricted from trading.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:14 am
by mike87
Saint3333 wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:08 am
I seldom agree with AOC, but she's spot on that US elected officials and their families should be treated similar to investment professionals and insiders on individual stocks, i.e. restricted from trading.
Or make them fund managers that we could invest with. I'd pay Nancy P to invest my money.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:46 am
by Saint3333
mike87 wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:14 am
Saint3333 wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:08 am
I seldom agree with AOC, but she's spot on that US elected officials and their families should be treated similar to investment professionals and insiders on individual stocks, i.e. restricted from trading.
Or make them fund managers that we could invest with. I'd pay Nancy P to invest my money.
I'd pay anyone that has the power to make the rules that create winners or losers by industry. To be clear she isn't a smart investor, she is cheating the system buying stock (options actually) and then driving legislation to hit on those options. And this is pervasive by both parties, sickening manipulation of power and greed.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:16 am
by mike87
Saint3333 wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:46 am
mike87 wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:14 am
Saint3333 wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:08 am
I seldom agree with AOC, but she's spot on that US elected officials and their families should be treated similar to investment professionals and insiders on individual stocks, i.e. restricted from trading.
Or make them fund managers that we could invest with. I'd pay Nancy P to invest my money.
I'd pay anyone that has the power to make the rules that create winners or losers by industry. To be clear she isn't a smart investor, she is cheating the system buying stock (options actually) and then driving legislation to hit on those options. And this is pervasive by both parties, sickening manipulation of power and greed.
100% agree. But just like term limits getting the violators to enact legislation to prevent ain't happening. Can't beat them, join them.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:24 am
by t4pizza
Deano wrote:
Fri Jan 07, 2022 9:45 am
I heard some one say that Nancy Pelosi bought 28 million dollars worth of AMC a week or two ago, she's statistically the best investor in the world, just saying, maybe the politicians know something.
It is not her, it is her husband (same effect) who does the investing as he is a venture capitalist and consulting guy.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:40 am
by Saint3333
He was in real estate... What a farce, fox in the hen house.

Re: To AMC or not to AMC

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 11:41 am
by TheMoody1
The Golden Rule. Those with the gold, make the rules.