

Guy is a BEAST
GO APPS!!
So much data out there to refute these excuses too. Bottom line, on a down to down basis App was a top 30 offense in the country. It was those 3rd and 4th and short failures that really hamstrung the offense, and the season . Sorry to break it to some folks, but injuries don’t just magically show up in those short yardage situations, while the offense operates smoothly otherwise. The offense dared the defenses to line up and beat them time and time again, and the offense ended up losing those battles. I don’t hate playing that style of football. I do hate not making adjustments when it’s clear the team you have at the moment obviously can’t play that style of football successfully.
Pot meet kettle. You don’t like the reasons for results so you call them excuses. There are people on this board that have tried to explain why things happened. They aren’t excuses. It’s called cause and effect. You just don’t care to be challenged and are dismissive of anyone’s thoughts that don’t line up with yours because you seem to need the validation. The simple fact that you can’t speak directly to me by quoting my comment tells me everything that I need to know about you. Winning happens for reasons. Losing happens for reasons. It’s pretty simple to understand. Even for someone like you.
That won't happen. The whiners will just find something else to complain about.
Liar! You can't want him to succeed because you said mean things. You just don't understand. You're a bad fan.
Wanting to succeed and still putting him down when he succeeds is different.
Stop trying to make sense will youAppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:03 amThat won't happen. The whiners will just find something else to complain about.
Whiner: "Clark has to go!!!!"
Common sense haver: "Uh, we just beat Carolina by 28 points"
W: "yeah, but it would have been by at least 50 and we really would have made a statement if Clark was any good"
I know, I’m the worst!
I don’t think it’s talking out of both ends. Like Saint said, we all want Shawn to succeed. But there have been a few obvious flaws during his tenure so far at App. Some take it personal when those flaws have been discussed, and then make it out like we’re advocating for something much more extreme. Honestly, the division it causes amongst some corners of the fan base is why I wonder if having an alum as head coach is productiveAppmountaineers19 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:24 amStop trying to make sense will youAppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:03 amThat won't happen. The whiners will just find something else to complain about.
Whiner: "Clark has to go!!!!"
Common sense haver: "Uh, we just beat Carolina by 28 points"
W: "yeah, but it would have been by at least 50 and we really would have made a statement if Clark was any good"Some of these poster talk out both ends about SC.
Thing is nobody is denying those flaw either. No, he hasn't been perfect. Nobody denies that. Likewise, when people come on here and state factually why things are certain ways, it's making excuses. There's a difference between making excuses and explaining reasons when people ask.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:33 amI don’t think it’s talking out of both ends. Like Saint said, we all want Shawn to succeed. But there have been a few obvious flaws during his tenure so far at App. Some take it personal when those flaws have been discussed, and then make it out like we’re advocating for something much more extreme. Honestly, the division it causes amongst some corners of the fan base is why I wonder if having an alum as head coach is productiveAppmountaineers19 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:24 amStop trying to make sense will youAppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:03 amThat won't happen. The whiners will just find something else to complain about.
Whiner: "Clark has to go!!!!"
Common sense haver: "Uh, we just beat Carolina by 28 points"
W: "yeah, but it would have been by at least 50 and we really would have made a statement if Clark was any good"Some of these poster talk out both ends about SC.
Au contraire, the folks I’m talking about do not acknowledge such flaws. *Everything* is someone else’s fault, always.AppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:39 amThing is nobody is denying those flaw either. No, he hasn't been perfect. Nobody denies that. Likewise, when people come on here and state factually why things are certain ways, it's making excuses. There's a difference between making excuses and explaining reasons when people ask.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:33 amI don’t think it’s talking out of both ends. Like Saint said, we all want Shawn to succeed. But there have been a few obvious flaws during his tenure so far at App. Some take it personal when those flaws have been discussed, and then make it out like we’re advocating for something much more extreme. Honestly, the division it causes amongst some corners of the fan base is why I wonder if having an alum as head coach is productiveAppmountaineers19 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:24 amStop trying to make sense will youAppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:03 amThat won't happen. The whiners will just find something else to complain about.
Whiner: "Clark has to go!!!!"
Common sense haver: "Uh, we just beat Carolina by 28 points"
W: "yeah, but it would have been by at least 50 and we really would have made a statement if Clark was any good"Some of these poster talk out both ends about SC.
Excuse: "We would have won, but the refs called kick catch interference on a punt and that changed the entire outcome of the game!"
Reason: "We are limited depth at LB ad DB right now and with a couple in games injuries, JMU realized it and exploited it by chipping our pass rushers with the RB and putting our CBs in one on one situations and capitalized."
I am not stating you or Saint advocated for more extreme, but there are plenty on here that did (and still do).
Wait, so because someone says something in a different way, that makes them not acknowledging faults? The lack of depth last season was due to the lack of recruiting in the 2019 season. There's no other way to put it. Could it have been fixed before last season? Yes. Were attempts made but failed for various reasons? Yes. It would have been shown in 2021 season instead but the super seniors fixed it for that year (and caused an imbalance but that's a different discussion).Yosef10 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:57 amAu contraire, the folks I’m talking about do not acknowledge such flaws. *Everything* is someone else’s fault, always.AppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:39 amThing is nobody is denying those flaw either. No, he hasn't been perfect. Nobody denies that. Likewise, when people come on here and state factually why things are certain ways, it's making excuses. There's a difference between making excuses and explaining reasons when people ask.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:33 amI don’t think it’s talking out of both ends. Like Saint said, we all want Shawn to succeed. But there have been a few obvious flaws during his tenure so far at App. Some take it personal when those flaws have been discussed, and then make it out like we’re advocating for something much more extreme. Honestly, the division it causes amongst some corners of the fan base is why I wonder if having an alum as head coach is productiveAppmountaineers19 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:24 amStop trying to make sense will youAppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:03 am
That won't happen. The whiners will just find something else to complain about.
Whiner: "Clark has to go!!!!"
Common sense haver: "Uh, we just beat Carolina by 28 points"
W: "yeah, but it would have been by at least 50 and we really would have made a statement if Clark was any good"Some of these poster talk out both ends about SC.
Excuse: "We would have won, but the refs called kick catch interference on a punt and that changed the entire outcome of the game!"
Reason: "We are limited depth at LB ad DB right now and with a couple in games injuries, JMU realized it and exploited it by chipping our pass rushers with the RB and putting our CBs in one on one situations and capitalized."
I am not stating you or Saint advocated for more extreme, but there are plenty on here that did (and still do).
Piggybacking off your depth example. Shawn had 2020, 2021, and 2022 offseason to build depth for the 2022 season. But the most common refrain I hear is that it’s the 2019 coach’s fault for said lack of depth. Can say it til blue in the face, but repeating something as many times as it can be does not make it the truth.
If you wanna tell me that Clark should be cut some slack in regard to lack of depth in ‘22 due to him being a first time HC, first year being COVID, Transfer Portal, NIL etc., then yeah I’m all ears, but that’s not how it’s ever presented. It’s presented as “oh look at this mess Shawn is having to clean up”. If 2022 showed us anything, it’s that if Shawn was actually stepping into a messy situation, he likely wouldn’t have won 19 games his first two years.
All that said, I’ve been happy to see some of the big picture changes he’s made in this offseason, especially in regards to recruiting timelines. Glad to see him able to adapt.
AppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 10:22 amWait, so because someone says something in a different way, that makes them not acknowledging faults? The lack of depth last season was due to the lack of recruiting in the 2019 season. There's no other way to put it. Could it have been fixed before last season? Yes. Were attempts made but failed for various reasons? Yes. It would have been shown in 2021 season instead but the super seniors fixed it for that year (and caused an imbalance but that's a different discussion).Yosef10 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:57 amAu contraire, the folks I’m talking about do not acknowledge such flaws. *Everything* is someone else’s fault, always.AppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:39 amThing is nobody is denying those flaw either. No, he hasn't been perfect. Nobody denies that. Likewise, when people come on here and state factually why things are certain ways, it's making excuses. There's a difference between making excuses and explaining reasons when people ask.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:33 amI don’t think it’s talking out of both ends. Like Saint said, we all want Shawn to succeed. But there have been a few obvious flaws during his tenure so far at App. Some take it personal when those flaws have been discussed, and then make it out like we’re advocating for something much more extreme. Honestly, the division it causes amongst some corners of the fan base is why I wonder if having an alum as head coach is productiveAppmountaineers19 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:24 am
Stop trying to make sense will youSome of these poster talk out both ends about SC.
Excuse: "We would have won, but the refs called kick catch interference on a punt and that changed the entire outcome of the game!"
Reason: "We are limited depth at LB ad DB right now and with a couple in games injuries, JMU realized it and exploited it by chipping our pass rushers with the RB and putting our CBs in one on one situations and capitalized."
I am not stating you or Saint advocated for more extreme, but there are plenty on here that did (and still do).
Piggybacking off your depth example. Shawn had 2020, 2021, and 2022 offseason to build depth for the 2022 season. But the most common refrain I hear is that it’s the 2019 coach’s fault for said lack of depth. Can say it til blue in the face, but repeating something as many times as it can be does not make it the truth.
If you wanna tell me that Clark should be cut some slack in regard to lack of depth in ‘22 due to him being a first time HC, first year being COVID, Transfer Portal, NIL etc., then yeah I’m all ears, but that’s not how it’s ever presented. It’s presented as “oh look at this mess Shawn is having to clean up”. If 2022 showed us anything, it’s that if Shawn was actually stepping into a messy situation, he likely wouldn’t have won 19 games his first two years.
All that said, I’ve been happy to see some of the big picture changes he’s made in this offseason, especially in regards to recruiting timelines. Glad to see him able to adapt.
But, what you're saying is if someone says "Wow, Clark really had an uphill battle being a first time coach through Covid, NIL, and transfer portal and is still learning" is ok. But someone that says "Wow, Clark did what he could being a first time head coach during a pandemic so he couldn't recruit as well as he needed to fix some known soft spots and didn't have any NIL money to compete for transfers" is not ok? It's literally the same thing -- just said different.
Should he have gone to the portal sooner? Yeah, probably.
Did he go to the portal before this season and struck out a lot because of zero NIL dollars? Yes.
Did we see an influx of NIL dollars and thus won battles for transfers we would have lost the previous years? Yes.
All of those are not excuses. Those are reasons.
The excuse would be "Clark did absolutely everything he could to land a 5 star recruit, but alas, we he committed to Kirby Smart because Kirby guaranteed him playing time as a freshman and we just do it differently on the mountain so we couldn't do that. And that really messed up our recruiting class because so much time was focused on that one program changing player." (obviously extreme, but you get the point).
You choosing to dismiss the notion doesn’t make it less factual. It just means that you have made up your mind and aren’t open for discussion.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:57 amAu contraire, the folks I’m talking about do not acknowledge such flaws. *Everything* is someone else’s fault, always.AppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:39 amThing is nobody is denying those flaw either. No, he hasn't been perfect. Nobody denies that. Likewise, when people come on here and state factually why things are certain ways, it's making excuses. There's a difference between making excuses and explaining reasons when people ask.Yosef10 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:33 amI don’t think it’s talking out of both ends. Like Saint said, we all want Shawn to succeed. But there have been a few obvious flaws during his tenure so far at App. Some take it personal when those flaws have been discussed, and then make it out like we’re advocating for something much more extreme. Honestly, the division it causes amongst some corners of the fan base is why I wonder if having an alum as head coach is productiveAppmountaineers19 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:24 amStop trying to make sense will youAppStateNews wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 9:03 am
That won't happen. The whiners will just find something else to complain about.
Whiner: "Clark has to go!!!!"
Common sense haver: "Uh, we just beat Carolina by 28 points"
W: "yeah, but it would have been by at least 50 and we really would have made a statement if Clark was any good"Some of these poster talk out both ends about SC.
Excuse: "We would have won, but the refs called kick catch interference on a punt and that changed the entire outcome of the game!"
Reason: "We are limited depth at LB ad DB right now and with a couple in games injuries, JMU realized it and exploited it by chipping our pass rushers with the RB and putting our CBs in one on one situations and capitalized."
I am not stating you or Saint advocated for more extreme, but there are plenty on here that did (and still do).
Piggybacking off your depth example. Shawn had 2020, 2021, and 2022 offseason to build depth for the 2022 season. But the most common refrain I hear is that it’s the 2019 coach’s fault for said lack of depth. Can say it til blue in the face, but repeating something as many times as it can be does not make it the truth.
If you wanna tell me that Clark should be cut some slack in regard to lack of depth in ‘22 due to him being a first time HC, first year being COVID, Transfer Portal, NIL etc., then yeah I’m all ears, but that’s not how it’s ever presented. It’s presented as “oh look at this mess Shawn is having to clean up”. If 2022 showed us anything, it’s that if Shawn was actually stepping into a messy situation, he likely wouldn’t have won 19 games his first two years.
All that said, I’ve been happy to see some of the big picture changes he’s made in this offseason, especially in regards to recruiting timelines. Glad to see him able to adapt.
Defense - Fletcher & Shawn Collins and the improved Markell Clarkappstate24 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2023 10:46 amSoooooo, who is everyone excited about this year?![]()
I’ll start…
On Defense-
I already mentioned seeing Michael Fletcher at Fan Fest. He’s a monster, I’ve heard great things, and I’m looking forward to watching him.
I also look for a great season from Andrew Parker and Tyreek Funderburk.
On Offense-
I believe Nate is going to have a killer season. Feels like he’s being slept on a little bit. I think he will have a chip on his shoulder. I also look forward to watching Kaedin Robinson at WR, and obviously whoever takes them helm at QB.
Coaches-
Very excited to see what Coach Matt has done with our guys. Also, excited to see Coach Cabral and his boys on the DLine.
Just doing my part to get this bad boy back on track.![]()
![]()
GO APPS!!