Position coaches work for menial wages relative to an hourly rate and are almost always on a one year contract. They are also employees of the school and not participating in extra-curricular acitivities as a part of their education. Their education is typically completed by that point.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Thu Dec 25, 2025 11:06 amKirby had 5 jobs in 5 years “climbing the ladder”Yosef84 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 25, 2025 10:02 amSorry, but I can't really agree with your perspective on this one. There's nothing "disgusting" about a coach who has paid his dues and climbed the ladder successfully advising players to do what he did. Work hard and get better. He's absolutely right. Many of the players on his roster have the opportunity to make more than he does. He's telling him what he believes to be the best path, and I agree with him 100%. Finish what you start. He's not telling them never to transfer. He's saying that December is the opportunity to get better. I really do understand your point. I personally think the money being thrown around in college sports (including coaching salaries) is obscene, but I can't blame them for taking advantage of the situation as it exists. That applies to both the coaches and the players.BallantyneApp wrote: ↑Wed Dec 24, 2025 3:16 pmI don’t like where cfb is as much as anyone, but there’s something disgusting about the guy making $12MM a year telling the guys (mostly) making a small fraction of that to be happy with their place and not try to make more money? Would anyone agree if the CEO of wal mart said the same thing to the front line workers that make 1/10000 of what he does? I wouldn’t.
We had a chance to fix college football but when you have coaches making many times more than the university CEOs this was only ever going to lead to this.
Merry Christmas!
The players only get 5 years total. Most of them are not going to the nfl.
Kirby himself is tampering with anybody he thinks can help him next year
Had the NCAA argued their case correctly, that they are comprised of non-profit membership which does not seek to profit off of players but rather acts in the public interest as educational, research, and providing athletics opportunities that individuals would otherwise not receive, they may have had a different outcome. There is a lot of legalese to this that I don’t necessarily understand but they could have taken a different defense, focusing on being non-profit and constantly reinvesting every cent back into the school, but they didn’t. It’s an educational mission, not athletic.
Furthermore, I’m not sure how you can 1099 an athlete and require that they be a student or have any eligibility criteria enforced, at all. They are employees. The fact this hasn’t been ruled on is because no one wants to rock the boat that hard yet.
Personally, if I were a lawyer, I’d fish to find someone willing to do it because then the entire system burns to the ground. Kill it off.