



And the top 5 posters per month here get free access.
Going to make a huge difference in the visual of the field.
I usually try to avoid complaining on this board because I think we do too much of it. But in this case, if enough people voice their opinions, we have a chance of getting a better finished product. We know Doug Gillin is at least willing to consider the fans’ perspective.
Let me just take away that trackSayYesToTheRock wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:33 amI would like to see the hill brought closer to the field than Gillin said.
As a builder, my guess would be that they are going to grade the hill in a way that leaves space in front of it to build stands in a few years. It would be stupid not to plan ahead and I'm sure they are doing so.SayYesToTheRock wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:33 amI would like to see the hill brought closer to the field than Gillin said.
The red line shows where Gillin (on Twitter) said they're discussing the end of the hill. That is still over 20 yards behind the end zone.
Improvement? Definitely. But still leaves much to be desired.
The only reason I can think they'd leave this much space is if they need it for practice.
Lowering the field is a great idea which has been discussed on this board before but there are those, who seem to be in the know with inside info, that the rock underneath would be too much of an obstacle along with a creek that runs beneath the field. Since you're a builder, do you have a perspective on that?General Moore wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:13 pmAs a builder, my guess would be that they are going to grade the hill in a way that leaves space in front of it to build stands in a few years. It would be stupid not to plan ahead and I'm sure they are doing so.SayYesToTheRock wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:33 amI would like to see the hill brought closer to the field than Gillin said.
The red line shows where Gillin (on Twitter) said they're discussing the end of the hill. That is still over 20 yards behind the end zone.
Improvement? Definitely. But still leaves much to be desired.
The only reason I can think they'd leave this much space is if they need it for practice.
I also think it would be baddass if in a few years they would consider digging the main field down about 25 ft deeper which would make room to extend the stands all the way around and bring the fans closer!
Hopefully they are considering all of these things as they expand! Surely they are...
My understanding is, there is a creek running beneath KBS which prevents us from lowering the field.General Moore wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 12:13 pmI also think it would be baddass if in a few years they would consider digging the main field down about 25 ft deeper which would make room to extend the stands all the way around and bring the fans closer!
I just wonder if that would put the lower level at such a shallow angle that sight lines would stink. I also wish we'd go to individual chair backs. Even as a student I hated bleacher surfing on those aluminum seats. One drunk guy (sometimes me) lost balance and a whole row got taken out. It was dangerous then and it's dangerous now.SayYesToTheRock wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 1:02 pmAnother way to bring the stands closer to the field could be by replacing the existing lower stands with re-graded ones.
When I was on the video staff back in '11 that area was used by the Oline for their drills.SayYesToTheRock wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:33 amI would like to see the hill brought closer to the field than Gillin said.
The red line shows where Gillin (on Twitter) said they're discussing the end of the hill. That is still over 20 yards behind the end zone.
Improvement? Definitely. But still leaves much to be desired.
The only reason I can think they'd leave this much space is if they need it for practice.