Drink Interviews Update
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2019 11:46 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
Drink Interviews Update
So earlier today Wash. St. extended Leach which effectively takes him out of the running for Ark. Kiffin has made it known that Ole Miss is his preferred destination, Norvell allegedly has a handshake agreement with FSU. With all that being said the only person left out of the initial four interviews that we know about is Drink.
I said earlier that I thought Drink was option C, my gut tells me at the moment he is probably currently 1B behind Kiffin. Either that or Arkansas admin drops back and punts to a guy like Dave Clawson. Have sources inside the building at App but at the moment it is all business for ULL as it should be. Just wanted to share my thoughts on where this was headed.
I said earlier that I thought Drink was option C, my gut tells me at the moment he is probably currently 1B behind Kiffin. Either that or Arkansas admin drops back and punts to a guy like Dave Clawson. Have sources inside the building at App but at the moment it is all business for ULL as it should be. Just wanted to share my thoughts on where this was headed.
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2018 7:05 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 87 times
- Been thanked: 77 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Maybe it’s time to focus in on this weekends game and let the discussion die down until someone says something official. We have a championship game to play in two days. If Coach Drink is interested, then so be it it. I’d like to keep him, but this team has earned our support and that’s where our focus should be for the next couple of days. If there is anything to talk about we’ll know Sunday or Monday. Give ‘Em Hell Apps!
-
- Posts: 2066
- Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2015 11:50 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 787 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
I do like the fact that it appears he made them come see him in Boone rather than leave town and extended loss of focus for the championship game in his absence.
- hapapp
- Posts: 16932
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 12:48 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Rocky Mount, VA
- Has thanked: 2670 times
- Been thanked: 3068 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
The only thing I will say without any insight to the actual goings on, Arkansas better get it right. The once proud Razorbacks have fallen on hard times recently and one witnessed what little patience they displayed with Morris. Whomever takes the job better see some early signs of success or their time in Fayetteville will be short-lived. Coaches have egos and they all think they can come in and turn things around and while the money will likely be good, one has to think whether this is a job that is save-able in the short run.
As a young man, Drink can look at it two ways. If he fails, he's young enough to rebound and restore his future. On the other hand, at his age and with his connections, a better job will come if he is patient. I have no idea what he would/will do. But, I won't lose any sleep over it. He either is here in 2020 or he's not. I'm 68 and my perspective is a lot different than his.
As a young man, Drink can look at it two ways. If he fails, he's young enough to rebound and restore his future. On the other hand, at his age and with his connections, a better job will come if he is patient. I have no idea what he would/will do. But, I won't lose any sleep over it. He either is here in 2020 or he's not. I'm 68 and my perspective is a lot different than his.
-
- Posts: 6888
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3379 times
- Been thanked: 4082 times
- NavyApp
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:00 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: ENC
- Has thanked: 2710 times
- Been thanked: 1156 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Man if you look at Arkansas' depth chart their QB situation is scary bad. Hard to win many games with zero direction under center. To me that is the hardest job to sell right now. Your division is the toughest in all of football with LSU, Bama, and Auburn. It's a hard place to recruit to. On top of all that you have a fan base that demands to win. Whoever takes that job better be ready.
FREQS AND GEEKS!
- appstatealum
- Posts: 3499
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 1:45 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Charlotte/Gastonia
- Has thanked: 3525 times
- Been thanked: 1931 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Drinks Agent- “Hey Eli, congratulations on a good season so far. So, as we predicted, I am starting to field calls about your interest in some coaching vacancies.”
Drink - “Ok, who all is calling?”
Agent- “BC, Mizzou, .... Arkansas. Arkansas would really like to meet ASAP.”
Drink- “well, obviously I have some ties there and being able to coach in the SEC West would be the pinnacle, but I’ve got to focus on the 1-0 and get these boys ready for our SB Championship game. Tell them if they want to talk, they can come on up here and I’ll work out some time to sit with them. It won’t hurt to hear what they have to say and the PR could be good for me for the future even if I’m just a third or fourth option, I definitely don’t want the opportunity to pass, you never know how many opportunities will be available like this.”
If this is how it goes down (in so many words), I would do the same, maybe he is like us and figures he is just one name on a long list. He talked to Missouri in the past about an OC job and that’s how DG heard about him. Missouri thought highly of him, but didn’t hire him for probably multiple reasons that any current Power school would be considering as well and Drink wanted to be a HC, not just an OC. One of DGs contacts let him know about Drink and his intentions to be a HC, so Drink brought him in. The rest is history.
Drink - “Ok, who all is calling?”
Agent- “BC, Mizzou, .... Arkansas. Arkansas would really like to meet ASAP.”
Drink- “well, obviously I have some ties there and being able to coach in the SEC West would be the pinnacle, but I’ve got to focus on the 1-0 and get these boys ready for our SB Championship game. Tell them if they want to talk, they can come on up here and I’ll work out some time to sit with them. It won’t hurt to hear what they have to say and the PR could be good for me for the future even if I’m just a third or fourth option, I definitely don’t want the opportunity to pass, you never know how many opportunities will be available like this.”
If this is how it goes down (in so many words), I would do the same, maybe he is like us and figures he is just one name on a long list. He talked to Missouri in the past about an OC job and that’s how DG heard about him. Missouri thought highly of him, but didn’t hire him for probably multiple reasons that any current Power school would be considering as well and Drink wanted to be a HC, not just an OC. One of DGs contacts let him know about Drink and his intentions to be a HC, so Drink brought him in. The rest is history.
The Appalachian State
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:15 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Shanghai
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
If the outcome is unfavorable on Saturday, can’t help but think there will be MUCH speculation on distractions as a result of the head coach’s decision to take an interview the week of a conference championship game. Regardless of “business as usual appearance”, it’s basic human nature to think about the head coach bailing-out on game prep for interview prep + the interview itself and then bouncing the day after this week’s game. So it undoubtedly IS on the minds of many in that building. Whether it makes any difference or not remains to be seen, but fortunately (or unfortunately) the players have some prior experience with the issue.beachneer40 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:08 pmSo earlier today Wash. St. extended Leach which effectively takes him out of the running for Ark. Kiffin has made it known that Ole Miss is his preferred destination, Norvell allegedly has a handshake agreement with FSU. With all that being said the only person left out of the initial four interviews that we know about is Drink.
I said earlier that I thought Drink was option C, my gut tells me at the moment he is probably currently 1B behind Kiffin. Either that or Arkansas admin drops back and punts to a guy like Dave Clawson. Have sources inside the building at App but at the moment it is all business for ULL as it should be. Just wanted to share my thoughts on where this was headed.
You can say “it’s business, this is how it works”, but it isn’t the best “team first” move. I get ambition and moving up the ladder and am all for it, but it’s something that should have taken place Saturday night or Sunday AM if there is genuine interest from the school + confidence in being the right person for that job.
-
- Posts: 11269
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7560 times
- Been thanked: 4830 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Distractions are on both sides. Louisiana’s AD has stated that he expects to lose Napier this year.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2019 11:46 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Really like this take. Also think that saturday could definitely effect the coaching carousel in general. A lot of dominos could fall, but at the moment my bet is Drink has his guys locked in, really think our guys are mentally tough enough to understand whats going on and still be able to lock in and focus on the task at hand saturday.MountainMan2020 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:37 pmIf the outcome is unfavorable on Saturday, can’t help but think there will be MUCH speculation on distractions as a result of the head coach’s decision to take an interview the week of a conference championship game. Regardless of “business as usual appearance”, it’s basic human nature to think about the head coach bailing-out on game prep for interview prep + the interview itself and then bouncing the day after this week’s game. So it undoubtedly IS on the minds of many in that building. Whether it makes any difference or not remains to be seen, but fortunately (or unfortunately) the players have some prior experience with the issue.beachneer40 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:08 pmSo earlier today Wash. St. extended Leach which effectively takes him out of the running for Ark. Kiffin has made it known that Ole Miss is his preferred destination, Norvell allegedly has a handshake agreement with FSU. With all that being said the only person left out of the initial four interviews that we know about is Drink.
I said earlier that I thought Drink was option C, my gut tells me at the moment he is probably currently 1B behind Kiffin. Either that or Arkansas admin drops back and punts to a guy like Dave Clawson. Have sources inside the building at App but at the moment it is all business for ULL as it should be. Just wanted to share my thoughts on where this was headed.
You can say “it’s business, this is how it works”, but it isn’t the best “team first” move. I get ambition and moving up the ladder and am all for it, but it’s something that should have taken place Saturday night or Sunday AM if there is genuine interest from the school + confidence in being the right person for that job.
-
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 10:10 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 1755 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Said it before and I’ll say it again. If Drink was going to take this interview this week he needed to find a way to keep it off anybody’s radar.
-
- Posts: 3805
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:27 am
- Has thanked: 1360 times
- Been thanked: 2143 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
All that is great in theory and I doubt that anyone would disagree conceptually, but Drink isn't the one driving the timeline here. Opportunities present themselves and sometimes you just have to do what you have to do. A first year head coach who is being considered for a huge step up (even if he's not a front runner) isn't exactly in a position to dictate terms.MountainMan2020 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:37 pmIf the outcome is unfavorable on Saturday, can’t help but think there will be MUCH speculation on distractions as a result of the head coach’s decision to take an interview the week of a conference championship game. Regardless of “business as usual appearance”, it’s basic human nature to think about the head coach bailing-out on game prep for interview prep + the interview itself and then bouncing the day after this week’s game. So it undoubtedly IS on the minds of many in that building. Whether it makes any difference or not remains to be seen, but fortunately (or unfortunately) the players have some prior experience with the issue.beachneer40 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:08 pmSo earlier today Wash. St. extended Leach which effectively takes him out of the running for Ark. Kiffin has made it known that Ole Miss is his preferred destination, Norvell allegedly has a handshake agreement with FSU. With all that being said the only person left out of the initial four interviews that we know about is Drink.
I said earlier that I thought Drink was option C, my gut tells me at the moment he is probably currently 1B behind Kiffin. Either that or Arkansas admin drops back and punts to a guy like Dave Clawson. Have sources inside the building at App but at the moment it is all business for ULL as it should be. Just wanted to share my thoughts on where this was headed.
You can say “it’s business, this is how it works”, but it isn’t the best “team first” move. I get ambition and moving up the ladder and am all for it, but it’s something that should have taken place Saturday night or Sunday AM if there is genuine interest from the school + confidence in being the right person for that job.
I see some folks on here who get very righteous about what a coach SHOULD do and when he makes "enough." All I can say is that these people have obviously never been offered a job that would multiply their salary. I think Drink will most likely be coaching App next year but if that doesn't turn out to be the case, I'm not going to begrudge him the pursuit of an opportunity like this (home state, SEC team, HUGE salary!).
Trust the Visor! Beat Louisiana!
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:15 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Shanghai
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Hope you’re right and they are locked in, but as it relates to the guy doing the game plan (and directly calling the plays) - I’m just considering if it’s reasonably possible to be focused 100% on the immediate task. Granted, most of us aren’t football coaches - but if you’ve ever taken a new job, you know the feeling during your last 1-2 weeks at the old one. Not suggesting you bail on your former employer and mail it in, but you’re excited for the new opportunity, you inevitably think ahead, you’re excited and a bit anxious. At best, it’s a distraction, and in my view one that should have been managed better (i.e., wait FOUR or FIVE days).
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:15 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Shanghai
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
It’s really two separate things. If we lose, naturally people will question whether this impacted the game in some way. Impossible to say to what extent it has on the outcome - maybe none - but I think it’s fair to say people are thinking about it.Yosef84 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:57 pmAll that is great in theory and I doubt that anyone would disagree conceptually, but Drink isn't the one driving the timeline here. Opportunities present themselves and sometimes you just have to do what you have to do. A first year head coach who is being considered for a huge step up (even if he's not a front runner) isn't exactly in a position to dictate terms.MountainMan2020 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:37 pmIf the outcome is unfavorable on Saturday, can’t help but think there will be MUCH speculation on distractions as a result of the head coach’s decision to take an interview the week of a conference championship game. Regardless of “business as usual appearance”, it’s basic human nature to think about the head coach bailing-out on game prep for interview prep + the interview itself and then bouncing the day after this week’s game. So it undoubtedly IS on the minds of many in that building. Whether it makes any difference or not remains to be seen, but fortunately (or unfortunately) the players have some prior experience with the issue.beachneer40 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:08 pmSo earlier today Wash. St. extended Leach which effectively takes him out of the running for Ark. Kiffin has made it known that Ole Miss is his preferred destination, Norvell allegedly has a handshake agreement with FSU. With all that being said the only person left out of the initial four interviews that we know about is Drink.
I said earlier that I thought Drink was option C, my gut tells me at the moment he is probably currently 1B behind Kiffin. Either that or Arkansas admin drops back and punts to a guy like Dave Clawson. Have sources inside the building at App but at the moment it is all business for ULL as it should be. Just wanted to share my thoughts on where this was headed.
You can say “it’s business, this is how it works”, but it isn’t the best “team first” move. I get ambition and moving up the ladder and am all for it, but it’s something that should have taken place Saturday night or Sunday AM if there is genuine interest from the school + confidence in being the right person for that job.
I see some folks on here who get very righteous about what a coach SHOULD do and when he makes "enough." All I can say is that these people have obviously never been offered a job that would multiply their salary. I think Drink will most likely be coaching App next year but if that doesn't turn out to be the case, I'm not going to begrudge him the pursuit of an opportunity like this (home state, SEC team, HUGE salary!).
Trust the Visor! Beat Louisiana!
As to the decision to interview, my self-righteous view is it could have been managed better. I’d like to think I’d tell myself if they really want me for the job, it will be there Saturday night or Sunday. Would express my high level of interest and then respectfully ask for a meeting right after the game if possible. I’d try not to miss my weekly radio show - which inevitably stirs the pot. If I need to meet this week, then can we do it in a way where it’s not all over the message boards within the hour? Maybe this is how it went down and everyone did their best. Oh well, let’s just win the game, and like others have said I won’t lose any sleep over it! (Or maybe I will... I live in Asia and it’s 3:15AM!)
-
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:38 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 87 times
- Been thanked: 456 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Arkansas interviewed Fuente yesterday.beachneer40 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:08 pmSo earlier today Wash. St. extended Leach which effectively takes him out of the running for Ark. Kiffin has made it known that Ole Miss is his preferred destination, Norvell allegedly has a handshake agreement with FSU. With all that being said the only person left out of the initial four interviews that we know about is Drink.
I said earlier that I thought Drink was option C, my gut tells me at the moment he is probably currently 1B behind Kiffin. Either that or Arkansas admin drops back and punts to a guy like Dave Clawson. Have sources inside the building at App but at the moment it is all business for ULL as it should be. Just wanted to share my thoughts on where this was headed.
Kiffin is believed to have a written agreement with Arkansas. The timing of the Ole Miss interest from Kiffin, a job he said he wasn't interested in initially, tells me that it's a ploy to get something in contract negotiations that Arkansas isn't wanting to give.
Kiffin is going to Arkansas unless whatever he's asking for is that important to him that he backs out, point blank. Norvel is going to FSU, almost for sure. Apparently Blake Anderson is one of the leaders for Mizzou. Ole Miss hasn't interviewed Drink that anyone knows of so he isn't likely to be going that.
-
- Posts: 2240
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2019 10:10 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 1755 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Just me but if I was doing the interview for AK and Drink ask me to wait a few days so he could focus on the task at hand it would have been a plus for Drink in my book. I would have respected his commitment to his current players and employer. But I don’t interview coaches for million dollar jobs and I imagine most folks who do would want to see him willing to do anything for the chance to talk to them.MountainMan2020 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:02 pmHope you’re right and they are locked in, but as it relates to the guy doing the game plan (and directly calling the plays) - I’m just considering if it’s reasonably possible to be focused 100% on the immediate task. Granted, most of us aren’t football coaches - but if you’ve ever taken a new job, you know the feeling during your last 1-2 weeks at the old one. Not suggesting you bail on your former employer and mail it in, but you’re excited for the new opportunity, you inevitably think ahead, you’re excited and a bit anxious. At best, it’s a distraction, and in my view one that should have been managed better (i.e., wait FOUR or FIVE days).
-
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:38 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 87 times
- Been thanked: 456 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
If Arkansas asked Drink if he wanted an interview and agreed to fly to North Wilkesboro, which they did, it wouldn't take ANY time out of Game Prep for Drink. They were wheels on the ground to wheels up in Wilksboro for 3 1/2 hours. They spent an entire day in Washington and have been back and forth to Boca for all of this week.Yosef84 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:57 pmAll that is great in theory and I doubt that anyone would disagree conceptually, but Drink isn't the one driving the timeline here. Opportunities present themselves and sometimes you just have to do what you have to do. A first year head coach who is being considered for a huge step up (even if he's not a front runner) isn't exactly in a position to dictate terms.MountainMan2020 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:37 pmIf the outcome is unfavorable on Saturday, can’t help but think there will be MUCH speculation on distractions as a result of the head coach’s decision to take an interview the week of a conference championship game. Regardless of “business as usual appearance”, it’s basic human nature to think about the head coach bailing-out on game prep for interview prep + the interview itself and then bouncing the day after this week’s game. So it undoubtedly IS on the minds of many in that building. Whether it makes any difference or not remains to be seen, but fortunately (or unfortunately) the players have some prior experience with the issue.beachneer40 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:08 pmSo earlier today Wash. St. extended Leach which effectively takes him out of the running for Ark. Kiffin has made it known that Ole Miss is his preferred destination, Norvell allegedly has a handshake agreement with FSU. With all that being said the only person left out of the initial four interviews that we know about is Drink.
I said earlier that I thought Drink was option C, my gut tells me at the moment he is probably currently 1B behind Kiffin. Either that or Arkansas admin drops back and punts to a guy like Dave Clawson. Have sources inside the building at App but at the moment it is all business for ULL as it should be. Just wanted to share my thoughts on where this was headed.
You can say “it’s business, this is how it works”, but it isn’t the best “team first” move. I get ambition and moving up the ladder and am all for it, but it’s something that should have taken place Saturday night or Sunday AM if there is genuine interest from the school + confidence in being the right person for that job.
I see some folks on here who get very righteous about what a coach SHOULD do and when he makes "enough." All I can say is that these people have obviously never been offered a job that would multiply their salary. I think Drink will most likely be coaching App next year but if that doesn't turn out to be the case, I'm not going to begrudge him the pursuit of an opportunity like this (home state, SEC team, HUGE salary!).
Trust the Visor! Beat Louisiana!
The amount of time spent with Drink tells me he was a part of their due diligence. It also helps in contract negotiations to have other interested parties so your target doesn't hold all the cards.
-
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:38 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 87 times
- Been thanked: 456 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Drink would be probably 4th or 5th in their group of targets considering the Chad Morris fiasco.Mjohn1988 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:20 pmJust me but if I was doing the interview for AK and Drink ask me to wait a few days so he could focus on the task at hand it would have been a plus for Drink in my book. I would have respected his commitment to his current players and employer. But I don’t interview coaches for million dollar jobs and I imagine most folks who do would want to see him willing to do anything for the chance to talk to them.MountainMan2020 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:02 pmHope you’re right and they are locked in, but as it relates to the guy doing the game plan (and directly calling the plays) - I’m just considering if it’s reasonably possible to be focused 100% on the immediate task. Granted, most of us aren’t football coaches - but if you’ve ever taken a new job, you know the feeling during your last 1-2 weeks at the old one. Not suggesting you bail on your former employer and mail it in, but you’re excited for the new opportunity, you inevitably think ahead, you’re excited and a bit anxious. At best, it’s a distraction, and in my view one that should have been managed better (i.e., wait FOUR or FIVE days).
They weren't going to wait and they likely already had a scheduled meeting with Kiffin. They likely had someone tell the AD to take time to talk to Drinkwitz considering his ties to Arkansas and success to this point in his career out of an abundance of caution. Assuming Drinkwitz was at the airport when they landed and left before wheels up, he probably took 3 hours out of a Saturday to meet with them.
Saturday was when the Arkansas plane flew from Arkansas to North Wilkesboro to Boca. They landed in Boca that night and spent close to the entire next day there.
-
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:38 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 87 times
- Been thanked: 456 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
I thought they were just preparing for his departure. There was no time table listed.
The only thing that could really happen is that Kiffin falls through at Arkansas, Fuente goes to Arkansas leaving Virginia Tech open. That's a job I could see Drinkwitz being on a short list for, unfortunately.
-
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:38 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 87 times
- Been thanked: 456 times
Re: Drink Interviews Update
Arkansas isn't exactly going around in stealth mode with this. Even if NO ONE knew in the Athletic Department, it would've come out the next day because of the sleuths and amateur pilots on Arkansas message board's.