3 More Bowls
-
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:53 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 462 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
Re: 3 More Bowls
Reality of being in the Sun Belt is that 6-6 doesn't necessarily earn you a spot in a bowl game. I remember a few years back that Western Kentucky went 7-5 and did not receive a bowl bid. Our expectations need to be higher than .500 to earn a bowl berth based on our conference affliation. It may take at least 8 wins to guarantee a bowl berth coming out of the Sun Belt.
- MtnDevil95
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:50 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Out there somewhere
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 190 times
Re: 3 More Bowls
I agree with this. Even ACC teams are only deemed "bowl eligible" at 6 wins, but not guaranteed an invitation. Attendance plays are role in bowl invitations as well. If App holds home attendance north of 20k or 25k, and has good showing on road games, then we'll be more likely to get a berth than a team of equal record with lower attendance. For the bowl organizers it’s about TV ratings, and inviting teams that will put butts in the seats and heads in the beds of local hotels.ASUGoose wrote:Reality of being in the Sun Belt is that 6-6 doesn't necessarily earn you a spot in a bowl game. I remember a few years back that Western Kentucky went 7-5 and did not receive a bowl bid. Our expectations need to be higher than .500 to earn a bowl berth based on our conference affliation. It may take at least 8 wins to guarantee a bowl berth coming out of the Sun Belt.
“When you take that field today, you've got to lay that heart on the line, men. From the souls of your feet, with every ounce of blood you've got in your body, lay it on the line until the final whistle blows.”
-
- Posts: 4818
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1545 times
- Been thanked: 1740 times
Re: 3 More Bowls
MtnDevil95 got us to the truth of the matter. The reason for bowls is to make money for bowl organizers. They are looking for fans to buy tickets and fill rooms and restaurants. Tickets and rooms have become a problem over the years so now in most cases schools have to guarantee rooms and tickets. The bowl organizers are guaranteed their profit and the schools take the gamble. The more bowls the bigger the gamble. Again in the vast majority of the time it is not a reward for a good season but is still a win, win. The schools buy more practice time and a game, and the organizers make money. There are lots of reasons for bowls but in most bowls prestige or reward just is not one of them.MtnDevil95 wrote:I agree with this. Even ACC teams are only deemed "bowl eligible" at 6 wins, but not guaranteed an invitation. Attendance plays are role in bowl invitations as well. If App holds home attendance north of 20k or 25k, and has good showing on road games, then we'll be more likely to get a berth than a team of equal record with lower attendance. For the bowl organizers it’s about TV ratings, and inviting teams that will put butts in the seats and heads in the beds of local hotels.ASUGoose wrote:Reality of being in the Sun Belt is that 6-6 doesn't necessarily earn you a spot in a bowl game. I remember a few years back that Western Kentucky went 7-5 and did not receive a bowl bid. Our expectations need to be higher than .500 to earn a bowl berth based on our conference affliation. It may take at least 8 wins to guarantee a bowl berth coming out of the Sun Belt.
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:53 am
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: 3 More Bowls
Yes. This.ASUGoose wrote:Reality of being in the Sun Belt is that 6-6 doesn't necessarily earn you a spot in a bowl game. I remember a few years back that Western Kentucky went 7-5 and did not receive a bowl bid. Our expectations need to be higher than .500 to earn a bowl berth based on our conference affliation. It may take at least 8 wins to guarantee a bowl berth coming out of the Sun Belt.
Given that the SBC appears to be a more challenging league than CUSA or MAC, and given the fact that at least 1-2 games per year will be against P5 schools, I'd say that 6-6 in FBS is harder to do than in FCS or D2. I think we will see for ourselves how hard it will be in time. And, as you stated, that record does not get us a guaranteed bowl birth in one of the 4 bowls that will take teams from the SBC.
I would take a bowl bid for a chance at a 7-6 season and some program exposure any day. Honestly, 4 tie-ins for the SBC is better than it was, but not as good as it should be. A number of bowl contracts are set to expire for CUSA in particular, and if the SBC can continue its OOC win history against the MAC and CUSA, and even get a team in the top 25, those contracts will have to include our new league.
- hapapp
- Posts: 16980
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 12:48 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Rocky Mount, VA
- Has thanked: 2691 times
- Been thanked: 3114 times
Re: 3 More Bowls
bcoach wrote:hapapp wrote:ASUMountaineer wrote:bcoach wrote:But a team who finishes at .500 won /lost is not.GoAppsGo92 wrote:[quote="bcoach
Someone who bats .500 in baseball is setting the world on fire.
Exactly, it is all relative to the situation at hand. Obviously, if our FH team had a .500 season that would be a great accomplishment. So, it is often apples to oranges.