Back to the second tier

JCline0429
Posts: 2180
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 8:17 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Back to the second tier

Unread post by JCline0429 » Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:57 pm

DoubleA wrote:I don't know. I am just one that thinks this whole academic association thing is not really that big a concern to the schools. If it was a real factor for duke they would be in conference with the ivy league schools. I truly think that the driving force is money. If academic standing were the driving force we would not have gone to the sun belt we would have stayed where we were.

Bingo, you hit the nail on the head.
+1000 to you and bcoach.
a.k.a JC0429

AppSt94
Posts: 11566
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
School: Appalachian State
Location: Huntersville, NC
Has thanked: 7856 times
Been thanked: 4976 times

Re: Back to the second tier

Unread post by AppSt94 » Sun Jan 19, 2014 7:15 pm

I don't know. I am just one that thinks this whole academic association thing is not really that big a concern to the schools. If it was a real factor for duke they would be in conference with the ivy league schools. I truly think that the driving force is money. If academic standing were the driving force we would not have gone to the sun belt we would have stayed where we were.


I don't disagree with you that money is driving "this" bus. But to compare the future to our move to the Sun Belt is not an apples-to-apples comparison. We are talking about universities aligning with members of their ilk with student-athletes. If you remove the student portion from the equation some schools may not want to participate in that venture. Schools like Duke, Vandy and Stanford don't need television money and conference affiliation to survive.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Appalachian Football”