Saint3333 wrote:That is true, but I challenge anyone to find a post in which I have spoken ill of Moore.
Your memory is short.
Saint3333 wrote:That is true, but I challenge anyone to find a post in which I have spoken ill of Moore.
T-Dog wrote:App State will honor Jerry when Jerry wants to be honored. Ball's entirely in his court.
Saint3333 wrote:Prove it.
Always liked Moore. You can support and appreciate what someone has accomplished and still know when it is time to move in a different direction.
Maddog1956 wrote:He was also standing outside suite 205-206, he still seems to have several friends there.
So you can't. I have a game worn helmet signed by the man that says just that in my office. Move along.JCline0429 wrote:Saint3333 wrote:Prove it.
Always liked Moore. You can support and appreciate what someone has accomplished and still know when it is time to move in a different direction.
I sure didn't see you taking up for him when he was called senile and brought up negatively when someone mocked his motto of "always do more than is expected."
For sake of tying up board space, I'll leave it at that.
I didn't catch it right away, but knew something was up when I saw Margaret talking to people in the West stands before the game.PBR1893-BEER-HAT-GUY wrote:In case y'all missed it Coach puttin family ahead of pride! This man needs to be in Boone at Kbs every Saturday. No better rep who still bleeds black and gold! Disagree ? Don't respond .....
No, I can't do a search of all your posts since the inception of the Rivals, Delphi, and Yosef's Cabin boards abd wouldn't bother if I could. Besides, it would be a matter of your interpretation of semantics anyway vs mine. I'll put it this way, I sure don't remember many positive posts directly concerning Coach Moore and as I said, I've never seen you defend him when others cut him down so blatantly and very derisively.Saint3333 wrote:So you can't. I have a game worn helmet signed by the man that says just that in my office. Move along.JCline0429 wrote:Saint3333 wrote:Prove it.
Always liked Moore. You can support and appreciate what someone has accomplished and still know when it is time to move in a different direction.
I sure didn't see you taking up for him when he was called senile and brought up negatively when someone mocked his motto of "always do more than is expected."
For sake of tying up board space, I'll leave it at that.
That's interesting, that's exactly what I was going to post to you. I'll throw it right back at you..cut and paste any two comments where you defended JM whan others were throwing vitriolic comments at him especially around the time he was canned. Otherwise, this conversation with you has ended.Saint3333 wrote:You have a terrible memory and are lazy to boot.
I was going to say the same. You make a charge, you provide the evidence.appst89 wrote:I always thought the one who made the claim had the burden of proof.
That doesn't apply when stirring a pot.hapapp wrote:I was going to say the same. You make a charge, you provide the evidence.appst89 wrote:I always thought the one who made the claim had the burden of proof.
appst89 wrote:I always thought the one who made the claim had the burden of proof. ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
I've read every post that's ever been put on this board.JCline0429 wrote:appst89 wrote:I always thought the one who made the claim had the burden of proof. ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
Did I say anything about protocol? Evidently, you and Happ haven't read Saint's posts over the last couple of years or more. Besides, if I was able to search his hundreds of posts, he would just say they were open to interpretation. I would like him to just cut and paste just ONE of his posts when he defended JM when he was bombarded with vitrole. Specific of course. You, too.
He sounds similar to one former poster, whose name I won't mention, who sponsored a golf tournament in Jerry's honor annually,yet bombarded JM with attacks..and still does on the AGS board.
Or when you can't.proasu89 wrote:That doesn't apply when stirring a pot.hapapp wrote:I was going to say the same. You make a charge, you provide the evidence.appst89 wrote:I always thought the one who made the claim had the burden of proof.