one reason we needed to move up
-
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 10:24 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Been thanked: 38 times
one reason we needed to move up
http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/med ... s-feedback
The board will seek feedback on some questions raised by members of governance bodies in recent days, including: the process by which items decided by the full division could become part of the list of autonomous areas; the voting, interpretation and enforcement processes within the five highest-profile conferences; and the core structure that separates not only the five highest-profile conferences into their own group but also continues a separation of the next five conferences (the American Athletic Conference, Conference-USA, Mid-American Conference, Mountain West Conference and Sun Belt Conference) from the remaining 22.
The board will seek feedback on some questions raised by members of governance bodies in recent days, including: the process by which items decided by the full division could become part of the list of autonomous areas; the voting, interpretation and enforcement processes within the five highest-profile conferences; and the core structure that separates not only the five highest-profile conferences into their own group but also continues a separation of the next five conferences (the American Athletic Conference, Conference-USA, Mid-American Conference, Mountain West Conference and Sun Belt Conference) from the remaining 22.
-
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:17 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1408 times
- Been thanked: 1083 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
In a "nut shell and in laymen terms": I do believe we made the move just in time. It is possible that when the dust settles we will probably be in a similiar situation we had in "The Old FCS." That is, the power conferences will still continue their bowl games, and the G5 will have a Div I Playoff. The current FCS members will become "The New Div II", so on and so forth. Not saying this will happen, however, it would not surprise me.
- appst89
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 395 times
- Been thanked: 2531 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM yesterday, and this potential split was a hot topic of discussion. Neuheisel had an idea that I hadn't considered, but it was interesting. He said that if the P5 wants to split then the G5 should move to playing spring football a la the old USFL. He believed the TV networks would be interested in that package and that the revenue could exceed what was lost if there was a true split since the only competition would be early season baseball. I'm not sure I would be in favor of that, but his point was that if the P5 really wants a split then give it to them completely with no option of playing a G5 opponent.
-
- Posts: 6781
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Raleigh
- Has thanked: 3366 times
- Been thanked: 2936 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
Any time you can emulate the business model of a league that folded after three seasons, you pretty much have to do it.appst89 wrote:I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM yesterday, and this potential split was a hot topic of discussion. Neuheisel had an idea that I hadn't considered, but it was interesting. He said that if the P5 wants to split then the G5 should move to playing spring football a la the old USFL. He believed the TV networks would be interested in that package and that the revenue could exceed what was lost if there was a true split since the only competition would be early season baseball. I'm not sure I would be in favor of that, but his point was that if the P5 really wants a split then give it to them completely with no option of playing a G5 opponent.
- appst89
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 395 times
- Been thanked: 2531 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
Didn't say it was a good idea, just interesting.EastHallApp wrote:Any time you can emulate the business model of a league that folded after three seasons, you pretty much have to do it.appst89 wrote:I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM yesterday, and this potential split was a hot topic of discussion. Neuheisel had an idea that I hadn't considered, but it was interesting. He said that if the P5 wants to split then the G5 should move to playing spring football a la the old USFL. He believed the TV networks would be interested in that package and that the revenue could exceed what was lost if there was a true split since the only competition would be early season baseball. I'm not sure I would be in favor of that, but his point was that if the P5 really wants a split then give it to them completely with no option of playing a G5 opponent.
- appgrouch
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:36 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: In my seat, waiting for people to shut up and play.
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 119 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
So is an outlet to a child with a bent paperclip in it's hand.appst89 wrote:Didn't say it was a good idea, just interesting.EastHallApp wrote:Any time you can emulate the business model of a league that folded after three seasons, you pretty much have to do it.appst89 wrote:I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM yesterday, and this potential split was a hot topic of discussion. Neuheisel had an idea that I hadn't considered, but it was interesting. He said that if the P5 wants to split then the G5 should move to playing spring football a la the old USFL. He believed the TV networks would be interested in that package and that the revenue could exceed what was lost if there was a true split since the only competition would be early season baseball. I'm not sure I would be in favor of that, but his point was that if the P5 really wants a split then give it to them completely with no option of playing a G5 opponent.
That's what I do. I gripe and I know things.
- appst89
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10091
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2000 3:26 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 395 times
- Been thanked: 2531 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
appgrouch wrote:So is an outlet to a child with a bent paperclip in it's hand.appst89 wrote:Didn't say it was a good idea, just interesting.EastHallApp wrote:Any time you can emulate the business model of a league that folded after three seasons, you pretty much have to do it.appst89 wrote:I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM yesterday, and this potential split was a hot topic of discussion. Neuheisel had an idea that I hadn't considered, but it was interesting. He said that if the P5 wants to split then the G5 should move to playing spring football a la the old USFL. He believed the TV networks would be interested in that package and that the revenue could exceed what was lost if there was a true split since the only competition would be early season baseball. I'm not sure I would be in favor of that, but his point was that if the P5 really wants a split then give it to them completely with no option of playing a G5 opponent.
Okay, sorry I even mentioned it.
Re: one reason we needed to move up
Good Gracious!!! Such meaness for a person just making a point...Grow-up guys....89 just making a point. There is always discussion about high school sports moving seasons in NC to get a bigger piece of the pie....I like it in the fall, it ain't gonna move....but wow....appst89 wrote:appgrouch wrote:So is an outlet to a child with a bent paperclip in it's hand.appst89 wrote:Didn't say it was a good idea, just interesting.EastHallApp wrote:Any time you can emulate the business model of a league that folded after three seasons, you pretty much have to do it.appst89 wrote:I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM yesterday, and this potential split was a hot topic of discussion. Neuheisel had an idea that I hadn't considered, but it was interesting. He said that if the P5 wants to split then the G5 should move to playing spring football a la the old USFL. He believed the TV networks would be interested in that package and that the revenue could exceed what was lost if there was a true split since the only competition would be early season baseball. I'm not sure I would be in favor of that, but his point was that if the P5 really wants a split then give it to them completely with no option of playing a G5 opponent.
Okay, sorry I even mentioned it.
Plus I had wondered where Packer had ended up!
Go APPS!
-
- Posts: 6781
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Raleigh
- Has thanked: 3366 times
- Been thanked: 2936 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
FWIW, I wasn't trying to pick on you. I got that you were just passing along Neuheisel's comment.appst89 wrote:appgrouch wrote:So is an outlet to a child with a bent paperclip in it's hand.appst89 wrote:Didn't say it was a good idea, just interesting.EastHallApp wrote:Any time you can emulate the business model of a league that folded after three seasons, you pretty much have to do it.appst89 wrote:I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM yesterday, and this potential split was a hot topic of discussion. Neuheisel had an idea that I hadn't considered, but it was interesting. He said that if the P5 wants to split then the G5 should move to playing spring football a la the old USFL. He believed the TV networks would be interested in that package and that the revenue could exceed what was lost if there was a true split since the only competition would be early season baseball. I'm not sure I would be in favor of that, but his point was that if the P5 really wants a split then give it to them completely with no option of playing a G5 opponent.
Okay, sorry I even mentioned it.
- BeauFoster
- Posts: 6870
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:42 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: In a cubicle
- Has thanked: 1741 times
- Been thanked: 2163 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
The NFL draft would be a big obstacle to contend with if they tried spring football. I'm sure they could work around it, but there's no way you could allow players to be drafted and still finish the season.appst89 wrote:I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM yesterday, and this potential split was a hot topic of discussion. Neuheisel had an idea that I hadn't considered, but it was interesting. He said that if the P5 wants to split then the G5 should move to playing spring football a la the old USFL. He believed the TV networks would be interested in that package and that the revenue could exceed what was lost if there was a true split since the only competition would be early season baseball. I'm not sure I would be in favor of that, but his point was that if the P5 really wants a split then give it to them completely with no option of playing a G5 opponent.
Give 'em hell!
- appgrouch
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:36 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: In my seat, waiting for people to shut up and play.
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 119 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
Wasn't meant as a shot at you. It is more the issue with the NFL-DL and the destruction of football sanity.appst89 wrote:appgrouch wrote:So is an outlet to a child with a bent paperclip in it's hand.appst89 wrote:
Didn't say it was a good idea, just interesting.
Okay, sorry I even mentioned it.
That's what I do. I gripe and I know things.
Re: one reason we needed to move up
His screen name is fitting. Grouch.appst89 wrote:appgrouch wrote:So is an outlet to a child with a bent paperclip in it's hand.appst89 wrote:Didn't say it was a good idea, just interesting.EastHallApp wrote:Any time you can emulate the business model of a league that folded after three seasons, you pretty much have to do it.appst89 wrote:I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM yesterday, and this potential split was a hot topic of discussion. Neuheisel had an idea that I hadn't considered, but it was interesting. He said that if the P5 wants to split then the G5 should move to playing spring football a la the old USFL. He believed the TV networks would be interested in that package and that the revenue could exceed what was lost if there was a true split since the only competition would be early season baseball. I'm not sure I would be in favor of that, but his point was that if the P5 really wants a split then give it to them completely with no option of playing a G5 opponent.
Okay, sorry I even mentioned it.
- appgrouch
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:36 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: In my seat, waiting for people to shut up and play.
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 119 times
one reason we needed to move up
At least I'm honest about it.AppAttack wrote:
His screen name is fitting. Grouch.
That's what I do. I gripe and I know things.
- luvyosef
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 2:33 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
Wouldn't work. Believe it or not, there are people out there who couldn't care less about the P5 conferences and teams.
Appalachian State University (Excellence since 1899)
- appdaze
- Posts: 4756
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:08 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 1725 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
appst89 wrote:I was listening to Mark Packer and Rick Neuheisel on XM yesterday, and this potential split was a hot topic of discussion. Neuheisel had an idea that I hadn't considered, but it was interesting. He said that if the P5 wants to split then the G5 should move to playing spring football a la the old USFL. He believed the TV networks would be interested in that package and that the revenue could exceed what was lost if there was a true split since the only competition would be early season baseball. I'm not sure I would be in favor of that, but his point was that if the P5 really wants a split then give it to them completely with no option of playing a G5 opponent.
The biggest problem for spring football would be the weather. Pre season training camps would either have to be all indoors or in freezing temps for about half of america. Lots of early games would get snowed/freezing rained out. More flights would be delayed for snow/spring rain/ice. I just don't see them being able to get around the weather unless they didn't start until April.
Another issue with starting in the spring is that the playoffs/postseason would more than likely drag on in to the summer after many kids have graduated who are on the team and the NFL draft happening.
- Rekdiver
- Posts: 7736
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:14 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1506 times
- Been thanked: 3910 times
-
- Posts: 4769
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1520 times
- Been thanked: 1713 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
Would it be ok if we female it like AppFan?Rekdiver wrote:Don't male this board like AppFan....Please!
Sorry, I am board today

-
- Posts: 14301
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2000 9:41 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3587 times
- Been thanked: 3372 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
bcoach wrote:Would it be ok if we female it like AppFan?Rekdiver wrote:Don't male this board like AppFan....Please!
Sorry, I am board today

"Some people call me hillbilly. Some people call me mountain man. You can call me Appalachian. Appalachian's what I am."-- Del McCoury Band
-
- Posts: 4769
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1520 times
- Been thanked: 1713 times
Re: one reason we needed to move up
You got me.AppinVA wrote:bcoach wrote:Would it be ok if we female it like AppFan?Rekdiver wrote:Don't male this board like AppFan....Please!
Sorry, I am board today
BORED