If that's the case wide recievers have been too strong all year. Playing 10 yards off is not a one game issue. It's an entire season issue. Some QB's aren't good enough to hurt you.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:54 pmMaybe their WR were too strong to handle in press coverage. Playing off reduces the risk of getting beat over the top by funneling the routes inside to allow for help. Sometimes you have to pick your poison when it comes to game planning.sometimes it works, other times it doesn't.Goapps15 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:39 pmYou have to modify some of it. Simplify it. We play 10 yards off and we get beat over the top. Both of those things can't happen.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:35 pmI get where your coming from, but if we don't continue to play our style with the young kids, how will they learn to play our style?
Defense
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:24 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Defense
-
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:00 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 238 times
- Been thanked: 468 times
Re: Defense
I agree, never showed a good angle but it looked like the face mask hit the QB in the chest. Maybe they thought it was under the chin. When a guy that size is coming full on he can't stop on a dime which is what he would have to do. I get the late hit call.
- YesAppCan
- Posts: 5879
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:52 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Greensboro
- Has thanked: 1602 times
- Been thanked: 568 times
Re: Defense
Maybe it’s as simple as we had the #6 recruiting class and ULM had #1.WVAPPeer wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:40 pmJust how should they adjust their game plan? - they have recruited players to fit their systems - are you talking a play here or there or big adjustments? - I do agree with you that the mental focus hasn't always been there and I am not sure why ---
Last edited by YesAppCan on Sun Nov 05, 2017 8:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:00 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 238 times
- Been thanked: 468 times
Re: Defense
That strategy cost us the game last week. We bent and broke on last drive. This week we just got beat all over on D. They especially took advantage of the weakness in the middle. Also that QB was good.pbscotts wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 7:35 amIf that's the case wide recievers have been too strong all year. Playing 10 yards off is not a one game issue. It's an entire season issue. Some QB's aren't good enough to hurt you.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:54 pmMaybe their WR were too strong to handle in press coverage. Playing off reduces the risk of getting beat over the top by funneling the routes inside to allow for help. Sometimes you have to pick your poison when it comes to game planning.sometimes it works, other times it doesn't.Goapps15 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:39 pmYou have to modify some of it. Simplify it. We play 10 yards off and we get beat over the top. Both of those things can't happen.
I agree with the fact that our coverage has been weak all year. We have a lot of ints against bad QBs. We have not been playing lock down coverage by any means.
Bright spot- how about our punt and KO returns this year! We have to be on pace for stellar numbers there.
Re: Defense
I also question the corners playing so far off of the receivers. We supposedly have two of the best in the conference. The whole idea of other receivers being stronger is complete bs outside of Georgia. I have yet to see a corner jam a receiver at the line. They just turn and run with them. Playing 10 yards off the receiver seems to allow the receiver to make his move and go. Even if he doesn’t, two 5 yard routes under our coverage equals a first down and the chains keep moving down the field.
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7570 times
- Been thanked: 4834 times
Re: Defense
Exactly as I saw it as well. You put your face mask in the chest then the crown of the helmet is naturally going to make contact with the chin area. Not forcible contact, but contact nonetheless. I won't argue the late hit.appbio91 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 7:57 amI agree, never showed a good angle but it looked like the face mask hit the QB in the chest. Maybe they thought it was under the chin. When a guy that size is coming full on he can't stop on a dime which is what he would have to do. I get the late hit call.
-
- Posts: 3808
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 11:27 am
- Has thanked: 1362 times
- Been thanked: 2145 times
Re: Defense
OK...I'm just a disappointed as everyone else and there is absolutely no doubt that this year's team should be performing better. At least in my opinion, even with the injuries, they should be playing better than we've seen the past couple of weeks and at times before (first half of Idaho, etc.). It happens. When injuries keep happening and we keep losing the on field leadership and fielding new lineups week after week (progressively younger and younger), the team doesn't seem to gel. I don't think lack of talent is our issue. I honestly don't know what the issue is but I serious doubt there is just one. Obviously injuries are a big factor.
We knew going into the game yesterday that ULM had a very dangerous offense. They have put up tons of points all season. That being said, they aren't better than Wake or certainly not better than Georgia. They are a pretty balanced team, and in that situation the D usually has to make a choice...defend the run / bring pressure and make them beat you throwing being the most common. Maybe the absence of Stringer (and the Fuller) kept that from happening. I really hope we can see something resembling the early season version of App D because yesterday was really frustrating.
I'm not giving up either. I'll be there Thursday in m Black & Gold. Three games left and GS is up next. I really don't feel like over analyzing last night because the coaching are far more equipped to do that than I am.
We knew going into the game yesterday that ULM had a very dangerous offense. They have put up tons of points all season. That being said, they aren't better than Wake or certainly not better than Georgia. They are a pretty balanced team, and in that situation the D usually has to make a choice...defend the run / bring pressure and make them beat you throwing being the most common. Maybe the absence of Stringer (and the Fuller) kept that from happening. I really hope we can see something resembling the early season version of App D because yesterday was really frustrating.
I'm not giving up either. I'll be there Thursday in m Black & Gold. Three games left and GS is up next. I really don't feel like over analyzing last night because the coaching are far more equipped to do that than I am.
-
- Posts: 4753
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1506 times
- Been thanked: 1694 times
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7570 times
- Been thanked: 4834 times
-
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2016 10:40 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 241 times
Re: Defense
Are there any former athletes other than myself who laugh at the posters who say that injuries cant cause a season like ours to take a turn for the worse? We are banged up more than I have ever seen. We have key players on both sides of the ball who have missed a lot of time and guys that are playing hurt...every team goes through injuries but we are dealing with is beyond your normal amt of injuries any given team has to deal with....where i am concerned tthe most with is our O-Line going into next season...we need to get a couple of good jucos or transfers who have the size and are ready to play. Our center needs to put on about 20 more lbs of mass
-
- Posts: 7799
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1018 times
- Been thanked: 949 times
- Contact:
Re: Defense
Yosef84 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 8:27 amOK...I'm just a disappointed as everyone else and there is absolutely no doubt that this year's team should be performing better. At least in my opinion, even with the injuries, they should be playing better than we've seen the past couple of weeks and at times before (first half of Idaho, etc.). It happens. When injuries keep happening and we keep losing the on field leadership and fielding new lineups week after week (progressively younger and younger), the team doesn't seem to gel. I don't think lack of talent is our issue. I honestly don't know what the issue is but I serious doubt there is just one. Obviously injuries are a big factor.
We knew going into the game yesterday that ULM had a very dangerous offense. They have put up tons of points all season. That being said, they aren't better than Wake or certainly not better than Georgia. They are a pretty balanced team, and in that situation the D usually has to make a choice...defend the run / bring pressure and make them beat you throwing being the most common. Maybe the absence of Stringer (and the Fuller) kept that from happening. I really hope we can see something resembling the early season version of App D because yesterday was really frustrating.
I'm not giving up either. I'll be there Thursday in m Black & Gold. Three games left and GS is up next. I really don't feel like over analyzing last night because the coaching are far more equipped to do that than I am.
Totally agree with your last paragraph.
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
-
- Posts: 7799
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1018 times
- Been thanked: 949 times
- Contact:
Re: Defense
Good post, nc.. However jucos are hard to find. There just aren't many junior colleges left.ncman071 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 9:38 amAre there any former athletes other than myself who laugh at the posters who say that injuries cant cause a season like ours to take a turn for the worse? We are banged up more than I have ever seen. We have key players on both sides of the ball who have missed a lot of time and guys that are playing hurt...every team goes through injuries but we are dealing with is beyond your normal amt of injuries any given team has to deal with....where i am concerned tthe most with is our O-Line going into next season...we need to get a couple of good jucos or transfers who have the size and are ready to play. Our center needs to put on about 20 more lbs of mass
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
-
- Posts: 4753
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1506 times
- Been thanked: 1694 times
-
- Posts: 4753
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:49 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1506 times
- Been thanked: 1694 times
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7570 times
- Been thanked: 4834 times
Re: Defense
As I have stated before. The late hit is what it is. The targeting call is total BS. You has a coach, I am assuming from the screen name that you were/are, should know that you are taught to play to the whistle. Looking at the play, Fuller was already in the act of tackling and had lost the ability to slow himself up. Just my opinion. It’s easy to say that he could have held up, but as I saw it his body angle didn’t have his feet under him and wasn’t able to stop the progress.
- WVAPPeer
- Posts: 12424
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:14 am
- School: Other
- Location: Born: Almost Heaven
- Has thanked: 4903 times
- Been thanked: 2627 times
Re: Defense
I would have to say Yes - not an intentional hit to the head but it doesn't have to be intentional - he had time to raise his arms or hands and not make contact like he did and yes, under the rule he deserved to be ejected ---
"Montani Semper Liberi"
The Dude Abides!!!
The Dude Abides!!!
-
- Posts: 11275
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7570 times
- Been thanked: 4834 times
Re: Defense
The rule over reaches. There was no "forcible" contact to the head or neck area. Fuller did what you are supposed to do which is put you face mask in the chest of the opposing player. The unfortunate side effect of a proper form tackle is that the crown of the helmet will come into contact with the opposing player. He didn't lead with his helmet. Once again, not arguing the timing of the hit. I am arguing the rule as it is written. In my opinion, they need to flag the play as under review, which will take place after the game by a panel of reviewers. If targeting is upheld, then the player misses the next game.
- AtlAppMan
- Posts: 2192
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:23 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: ATL
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 1433 times
Re: Defense
What are the odds you will lose a game when you give up 52 points?
What are the odds that you will lose games when you average giving up 30+ points per game?
Both very high.
I know we have injuries but where are the 2’s and 3’s that are Soph’s and Juniors across the D? Did we only recruit good players last year and all our future are freshman this year? Why the gap in recruiting talent?
What are the odds that you will lose games when you average giving up 30+ points per game?
Both very high.
I know we have injuries but where are the 2’s and 3’s that are Soph’s and Juniors across the D? Did we only recruit good players last year and all our future are freshman this year? Why the gap in recruiting talent?