Had his 19th nervous breakdown over losing.
We are in need of someone to take over the maintenance of the MMB. Yosef has done it for a long time, and we are grateful for all he has done, but life happens and he no longer has the time to devote to its upkeep. If anyone here is interested in helping to keep the board running, please let me know via DM.
Clemson game thread and discussion
-
- Posts: 7799
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:59 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1018 times
- Been thanked: 949 times
- Contact:
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
NewApp formerly known as JCline
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Google SUX
- T-Dog
- Posts: 6963
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:35 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 284 times
- Been thanked: 2961 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
It doesn't matter if App was playing the Chiefs. Giving up 500 yards in the first half and 700 yards total is inexcusable.
Aguilar was rattled and off. The WRs had trouble with separation.
The secondary should be embarrassed. Bad lines, slow and letting WRs run past them. The effort by Farmer on the fourth Clemson TD was pitiful. Only DB who played decently was Favors.
We have 4 RBs and they're all limited. Kanye does kick returns and had two howlers, Castle does pass pro and is more of a FB, Marshall is also a bull rusher and Haywood can be shifty but the coaches don't see him as a feature back.
OL did OK. Joey had enough time to make throws. He just missed many of them.
Lake had a couple bad punts and one outside of the coverage zone.
Clemson played a masterful game and deserves A+ grades across the board. That doesn't excuse being down 42-0 just 18 minutes in.
Aguilar was rattled and off. The WRs had trouble with separation.
The secondary should be embarrassed. Bad lines, slow and letting WRs run past them. The effort by Farmer on the fourth Clemson TD was pitiful. Only DB who played decently was Favors.
We have 4 RBs and they're all limited. Kanye does kick returns and had two howlers, Castle does pass pro and is more of a FB, Marshall is also a bull rusher and Haywood can be shifty but the coaches don't see him as a feature back.
OL did OK. Joey had enough time to make throws. He just missed many of them.
Lake had a couple bad punts and one outside of the coverage zone.
Clemson played a masterful game and deserves A+ grades across the board. That doesn't excuse being down 42-0 just 18 minutes in.
-
- Posts: 7087
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 3441 times
- Been thanked: 4251 times
- Rekdiver
- Posts: 7736
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:14 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1506 times
- Been thanked: 3910 times
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:05 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 397 times
- Been thanked: 699 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
You know Rek I want this to be so wrong you’re embarrassed …but you’re exactly right. Next week will tell us so much about where App football is. We’re trending in the wrong direction I’m afraid.
- Rekdiver
- Posts: 7736
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:14 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1506 times
- Been thanked: 3910 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
lol…I meant the comments not team play!mountaineerman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:58 pmYou know Rek I want this to be so wrong you’re embarrassed …but you’re exactly right. Next week will tell us so much about where App football is. We’re trending in the wrong direction I’m afraid.
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:05 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 397 times
- Been thanked: 699 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Nice! Keeping the faith love it.Rekdiver wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:12 pmlol…I meant the comments not team play!mountaineerman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:58 pmYou know Rek I want this to be so wrong you’re embarrassed …but you’re exactly right. Next week will tell us so much about where App football is. We’re trending in the wrong direction I’m afraid.
-
- Posts: 2188
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 6:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 321 times
- Been thanked: 1270 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
For how many seasons can you sunshine pumpers say the same shit? Honestly. Give me a number.
- McLeansvilleAppFan
- Posts: 9524
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Greensboro (McLeansville) NC
- Has thanked: 4473 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
And I am not saying I don't support your position. This was a topic on the previous Delphi Board with previous men's basketball coaches and who (or is it whom) was hired.appstatealum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 12:31 pmYou're not wrong. My issue is more about the wallets we have here at App.McLeansvilleAppFan wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 12:26 pmAre there any ADs out there that are so flush with cash from other sources they can tell big donors to pound sand? I don't really like that system but unless we somehow require anonymous donations I doubt that ever gets to change. I only hope they folks with money make good decisions.appstatealum wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:30 amAgree. It's simpler to just say Doug is manipulated by a few select individuals and as much as I've liked Doug, I wish we had an AD that wasn't a puppet for a few walletsDenverOfTheEast wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:14 amThanks for having me back!
Clemson has a top 5 defense... there is no pre season in college so it takes til week 3 to really settle in as a team in college football.
and to reference your Clemson weak schedule comment - that's my point - App State can't continue to sneak up on these P5's each year and pull off an upset - Dabo had them boys ready, App made 2 3rd down mistakes in 1st quarter and the snowball rolled at that point.
Dummy down the schedule and the playoff is a possibility in the future!!! but not until then, can't ask a App State team to play perfect for 12 games. Doug gives in to the Sofields and Ricks crew on playing the big boys and other decisions -- he can't think for himself to help elevate the program, it's stuck in the purgatory of FBS.... Other schools stepped up there game and all he did was add seats to create more debt.
Now onto a rival game and a SBC game 4 days after that, tough sleding ahead.
Only 3 App State teams since 1990 has finished the season with only 1 loss -- #TeamClark was apart of 2 out of the 3.
This is my very generic signature added to each post.
- McLeansvilleAppFan
- Posts: 9524
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:37 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Greensboro (McLeansville) NC
- Has thanked: 4473 times
- Been thanked: 2234 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
You do know that Google owns YouTube?
Good musically choice also.
This is my very generic signature added to each post.
-
- Posts: 11421
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7721 times
- Been thanked: 4899 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Because it isn’t as bad as you want to believe that it is. Clark and his staff took a big chance on revamping the defensive scheme in the middle of the season that was going bad and he asked his players to believe in them. They went 6-1 to finish the season. We are where we thought we would be after two games record wise. But all of you that can’t stand the positivity want to focus on are the losses. Clark’s win % is comparable to Satt’s but hey you know, he isn’t the guy.
- AppDub
- Posts: 1481
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:52 am
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 1489 times
- Been thanked: 706 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Ironically, the post fit for both the comments and team play. Lots of similarities.Rekdiver wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:12 pmlol…I meant the comments not team play!mountaineerman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 6:58 pmYou know Rek I want this to be so wrong you’re embarrassed …but you’re exactly right. Next week will tell us so much about where App football is. We’re trending in the wrong direction I’m afraid.
-
- Posts: 2188
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 6:26 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 321 times
- Been thanked: 1270 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Satt built an FBS program from the ground floor. You know that is false equivalence.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:58 pmBecause it isn’t as bad as you want to believe that it is. Clark and his staff took a big chance on revamping the defensive scheme in the middle of the season that was going bad and he asked his players to believe in them. They went 6-1 to finish the season. We are where we thought we would be after two games record wise. But all of you that can’t stand the positivity want to focus on are the losses. Clark’s win % is comparable to Satt’s but hey you know, he isn’t the guy.
We haven’t won the conference in 5 years. Do you propose that the standard shouldn’t be winning the conference?
-
- Posts: 14426
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2000 8:42 am
- Has thanked: 4018 times
- Been thanked: 6209 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Satterfield inherited a mediocre FCS team.
Clark inherited a top 25 FBS team.
Let’s see what happens the next three weeks before the knives come out.
Clark inherited a top 25 FBS team.
Let’s see what happens the next three weeks before the knives come out.
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:05 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 397 times
- Been thanked: 699 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Last night was personally the worst thing I’ve experienced as an App fan. I’m 46. I’m not sure what you mean by revamping defensive scheme but you can’t watch last night and say there’s not some sort of issue in coaching. Our Defense has not been right for some time .AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:58 pmBecause it isn’t as bad as you want to believe that it is. Clark and his staff took a big chance on revamping the defensive scheme in the middle of the season that was going bad and he asked his players to believe in them. They went 6-1 to finish the season. We are where we thought we would be after two games record wise. But all of you that can’t stand the positivity want to focus on are the losses. Clark’s win % is comparable to Satt’s but hey you know, he isn’t the guy.
-
- Posts: 11421
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7721 times
- Been thanked: 4899 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Satt also did it in a much different era. App entered a much weaker league without having to deal with NIL and free agency (transfer portal). Those conference titles that you are holding onto by the short hairs are akin to the present day CUSA. I’m not suggesting that there shouldn’t be some frustration that we haven’t won a championship in a few years but firing someone who has shown that he can field a team that can compete with the heavyweights and compete and remain relevant in a much stronger conference is weird.yosef69 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 8:03 pmSatt built an FBS program from the ground floor. You know that is false equivalence.AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:58 pmBecause it isn’t as bad as you want to believe that it is. Clark and his staff took a big chance on revamping the defensive scheme in the middle of the season that was going bad and he asked his players to believe in them. They went 6-1 to finish the season. We are where we thought we would be after two games record wise. But all of you that can’t stand the positivity want to focus on are the losses. Clark’s win % is comparable to Satt’s but hey you know, he isn’t the guy.
We haven’t won the conference in 5 years. Do you propose that the standard shouldn’t be winning the conference?
Prior to last night, he took UNC to OT twice, had Miami on the ropes and took down A&M. Is that not at least comparable if not a better resume than anything that Satt did against P5s? Yes, last night was bad but it shouldn’t cause an over reaction. We’ve been to the Championship 2 of the last 3 years. How did Louisiana do the next year with a new coach? How is Troy starting out this year?
How many programs fire a coach because he didn’t win championship and actually win a championship within 3-4 years? The standard should be to compete for titles. Winning them is incredibly hard.
-
- Posts: 11421
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7721 times
- Been thanked: 4899 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Last night was bad. No one is arguing that. We switched to the Star package as our base last year mid season. We finished the season 6-1 against peer programs and started this year with a win. We are 7-2 since that switch but all anyone wants to judge the program on is last night. OK.mountaineerman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 8:18 pmLast night was personally the worst thing I’ve experienced as an App fan. I’m 46. I’m not sure what you mean by revamping defensive scheme but you can’t watch last night and say there’s not some sort of issue in coaching. Our Defense has not been right for some time .AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:58 pmBecause it isn’t as bad as you want to believe that it is. Clark and his staff took a big chance on revamping the defensive scheme in the middle of the season that was going bad and he asked his players to believe in them. They went 6-1 to finish the season. We are where we thought we would be after two games record wise. But all of you that can’t stand the positivity want to focus on are the losses. Clark’s win % is comparable to Satt’s but hey you know, he isn’t the guy.
-
- Posts: 11421
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:39 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Location: Huntersville, NC
- Has thanked: 7721 times
- Been thanked: 4899 times
-
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:05 pm
- School: Appalachian State
- Has thanked: 397 times
- Been thanked: 699 times
Re: Clemson game thread and discussion
Ok. You agree last night was the worst? That’s a start. And I’m not talking about last yearAppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 8:32 pmLast night was bad. No one is arguing that. We switched to the Star package as our base last year mid season. We finished the season 6-1 against peer programs and started this year with a win. We are 7-2 since that switch but all anyone wants to judge the program on is last night. OK.mountaineerman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 8:18 pmLast night was personally the worst thing I’ve experienced as an App fan. I’m 46. I’m not sure what you mean by revamping defensive scheme but you can’t watch last night and say there’s not some sort of issue in coaching. Our Defense has not been right for some time .AppSt94 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:58 pmBecause it isn’t as bad as you want to believe that it is. Clark and his staff took a big chance on revamping the defensive scheme in the middle of the season that was going bad and he asked his players to believe in them. They went 6-1 to finish the season. We are where we thought we would be after two games record wise. But all of you that can’t stand the positivity want to focus on are the losses. Clark’s win % is comparable to Satt’s but hey you know, he isn’t the guy.
Last edited by mountaineerman on Sun Sep 08, 2024 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.