Let’s agree to disagree on this. Strelow and Wilkerson-New excelled at providing fans with the information they needed without pandering to the administration. They were so effective, in fact, that Strelow was even offered a job! Administrations and coaches understand and respect the role of journalists who approach their work professionally. However, they lose respect for journalists who inject personal bias into their reporting or go behind their backs to gather information—those actions inevitably burn bridges.Pikapp79 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 11:14 amIf you are a journalist covering a program you better kiss administration butt. The same with radio broadcast. If you become anything but a yes man you are history. Just take it for what it’s worth.704App wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 11:10 amThis situation underscores exactly why having a dedicated journalist and beat writer is so important, in my opinion. I’m sorry you had to deal with being called a liar and similar accusations—it’s an unfortunate part of journalism today, and it’s a tough job to say the least.AppStateTailgate wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 10:52 amLet me give you a specific example of how hard it is to do real journalism and maintain access. Keep in mind this story takes place with a different administration at App State so no reflection on the current people there. When I ran AppStateNation (pre 247) I was frustrated that all of these "journalists" weren't getting any info about conference realignment (we were trying to get in Sun Belt/CUSA at the time). You could ask all the questions you wanted but they of course weren't going to answer openly about confidential discussions. Looking back I don't blame them, but at the time I didn't get it.704App wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:34 amThe problem with the current 247 sports setup is he won't ask the hard questions. Heck, the school newspaper journalists ask better questions and Clark would even say something like "this is what we need in this room!" when he asked the hard questions.
It isn't a matter of getting interviews at 247. It's a matter of getting answers to the people that pay for the site. You can get those answers elsewhere for free -- because the employees elsewhere ask the hard questions. It's not our job to do the research. That is the job of the journalist. 247 doesn't have a journalist.
WIthout Firemoose, 247 would essentially be a fan blog with zero information.
Finally I just researched how to do a FOIA request and submitted one. App State STILL refused to answer. They sent me a polite letter saying more or less to pound sand. I would have basically had to get a lawyer and I was 19 years old so that wasn't an option. So I got creative and I sent a FOIA request to Georgia Southern since I knew they were in a similar situation. They asked me for $20 to cover printing costs, which I provided. In return I immediately got a giant stack of emails and charts between the Sun Belt/Georgia Southern which included information about App State. I posted it on my blog and actually NBC Sports cited my blog as a source. Here's one example of a site citing me: https://www.aseaofred.com/new-informati ... alignment/. At the time I was really proud of myself.
What did I get in return for that "journalism"? About half of the people who read the articles called me a liar said I made the whole thing up for clicks. The school didn't trust me for years and it was hard for me to get interviews even when I worked at 247. And in the end we all found out we were going to the Sun Belt soon enough when the news was official anyway. So I burned bridges basically for nothing.
When we had coverage from writers like Strelow and Wilkerson-New, we had access to insights we don’t have now. They excelled at asking the right questions and providing the context needed for readers to draw their own conclusions—without burning bridges. They didn’t even have to spell out the answers; the context clues they provided allowed readers to piece things together themselves.
Additionally, having beat writers like them meant more information for everyone, including the "little guys." Press conferences played a significant role, and the administration often chose to share information directly because they knew it was going to come out anyway—it was better to frame it in their own words.
What earns respect (and sometimes even job offers) is handling sensitive information with integrity. For example, if someone in the department says, "We have a 5-star recruit visiting today, but we need to keep it under wraps," you might report something like, "Top prospects are visiting campus this weekend, and here’s a breakdown of potential offers and priority recruits." This approach respects the source’s request while still providing valuable information to the audience. It lets readers draw their own conclusions.
To be clear, this example is just that—an example. It’s meant to illustrate the balance journalists must strike between respecting sources and providing value to readers. On the other hand, what burns bridges is taking that same information and deducing, "Based on the offers out there, it must be this recruit," and publishing that. It’s a fine line to walk, but it’s essential in this industry.
And until we get a true beat writer, a fan-run site like 24/7 is unlikely to gather more information than what’s already available in public forums—unless higher-ups at 24/7 with established connections get involved. In many ways, it’s no different from platforms like this one when it comes to access to information. In fact, I’ve personally found that I often get better information faster here than I ever did on 24/7, which is why I ultimately canceled my subscription and joined this community. And yes, I was warned about the toxic nature, but the ignore button works wonders for filtering that out!
This is one of the reasons my aspirations to be a journalist faded when I became a student manager and saw how things really worked behind the scenes. It was challenging then, and it’s even tougher now. I’m still in the sports reporting industry (well, until my recent retirement), though not as a journalist.
Navigating this dynamic isn’t easy, but I appreciate the effort it takes to strike that balance. It’s a critical skill for any journalist in the field. I can't speak on radio as that is a completely different animal that I know nothing about -- except it's completely different than what I deal with.