dobis79 wrote:I wouldn't call their recruiting class terrible. I don't know how 247sports.com compares to Rivals, but it looks pretty respectable. They had six 3-star guys, and their class was ranked 108th out of 127 FBS programs. Of course that's not great, but its pretty good for a team that has never played a game.
http://charlotte.247sports.com/Season/2 ... ll/Commits
I wouldn't say horrible either. The quotes that were posted from the Charlotte board are priceless though.
"LOL! Compare our 2013 classes side by side. It's not close. We killed them. We had ELEVEN players with a Rivals Rating of 5.3 or higher. They had six."
What an idiot. There is such a huge difference between those 5.3 and 5.2 players, they KILLED us in recruiting. Compare the offers our guys had to the offers their guys had and I beg to differ, but lets say you take that out of the equation and just compare the Rivals and 247 rankings average. We are about as dead even as you can get, they might be ahead by a razor thin margin. They will probably say "Oh we are at a big disadvantage because we have never played". They were also recruiting with the promise of 100% guaranteed playing time in a FBS conference, while we were recruiting as an FCS team with whispers that we might be FBS. They were recruiting as a CUSA team, we were recruiting as a Southern conference team that hoped to move up, and the classes were dead even. Our classes are only going to get better when we are recruiting as an FBS team; I don't think they are going to see a big jump the next few years when they are 6-6 against a bunch of DII schools.